Skip to content

VIPPSTAR-G1 Digital Early Intervention for Visual Impairment

VIPPSTAR-G1: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Evaluating a Caregiver-mediated Digital Intervention to Promote Visual Function and Neurodevelopment in Infants at Risk of/With Visual Impairment

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07717671
Acronym
VIPPSTAR-G1
Enrollment
150
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Visual Impairment, Cerebral Visual Impairment, Neurodevelopmental Disorders, Prematurity

Keywords

visual impairment, early intervention, digital health, prematurity

Brief summary

Visual impairment in infancy is associated with significant risks for neurodevelopmental impairment. Early intervention based on enriched visual and multisensory experiences may promote neuroplasticity and improve developmental outcomes, but implementation of intensive interventions in routine clinical practice remains challenging. The VIPPSTAR-G1 study evaluates a caregiver-mediated digital intervention delivered through a dedicated platform designed to support visual and neurodevelopmental functions in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. This multicenter, multinational, single-blind randomized controlled trial will enroll 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment and an additional exploratory pilot subgroup of 48 infants and toddlers with established visual impairment. Participants will be randomized to receive either the VIPPSTAR digital intervention plus standard care or standard care alone. Outcomes include visual acuity, smooth pursuit, additional neuro-ophthalmological functions, neurodevelopmental measures, adaptive functioning, language development, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention.

Detailed description

The VIPPSTAR-G1 study is a multicenter, multinational clinical trial evaluating a caregiver-mediated digital early intervention designed to promote visual function and neurodevelopment in infants at risk of or with visual impairment (VI), within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The study is conducted within the framework of the VIPPSTAR Horizon Europe project and integrates telemedicine, digital health technologies, and individualized developmental support into routine clinical care. Visual function plays a fundamental role in early neurodevelopment. Vision represents the primary means through which infants explore and interact with the environment, while environmental experiences simultaneously shape the maturation and plasticity of visual pathways and broader neurodevelopmental networks. Visual impairment in infancy is therefore associated not only with altered visual functioning but also with increased risk for motor, cognitive, communicative, adaptive, and socio-emotional developmental difficulties. Visual impairment includes peripheral visual impairment (PVI), caused by ocular or anterior visual pathway disorders, and cerebral visual impairment (CVI), resulting from damage or dysfunction affecting post-geniculate visual pathways and visual cortical networks. These disorders often co-occur. CVI has become one of the leading causes of childhood visual disability in industrialized countries, particularly among infants born preterm or with neonatal neurological complications. Although early individualized intervention and visually enriched experiences are considered essential to support neuroplasticity and developmental outcomes, implementation of intensive family-centered intervention programs in real-world healthcare systems remains challenging because of limited accessibility, geographic barriers, shortage of specialized services, and socioeconomic constraints affecting families. Digital and telemedicine-based interventions may help overcome these limitations by enabling remote delivery of evidence-based developmental support integrated into everyday family routines. The VIPPSTAR-G1 protocol evaluates a caregiver-mediated home-based intervention delivered through a dedicated digital platform. The platform provides individualized developmental activities, audiovisual guidance materials, e-learning resources, remote supervision, and continuous communication with clinicians. The intervention is designed to promote naturalistic developmental learning and parent-child interaction within the child's daily environment. The protocol includes two distinct study populations conducted under a shared methodological framework: Study Sample 1 - Randomized Controlled Trial Cohort It constitutes the definitive randomized controlled trial (RCT) component of the protocol. This cohort includes 102 newborns at risk of visual impairment recruited from Neonatal Intensive Care Units (NICUs), nurseries, and neuropsychiatry outpatient clinics across participating sites in Italy, Belgium, and Moldova. Eligible infants are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to: the VIPPSTAR caregiver-mediated digital intervention plus standard care, or standard clinical care alone. Randomization is stratified by recruitment site and biological sex using computer-generated permuted blocks implemented through the REDCap randomization module. The primary objective of the RCT cohort is to evaluate the efficacy of the intervention in improving: 1)visual acuity, and 2)smooth pursuit eye movements. Secondary objectives include assessment of: visual processing speed and ocular motor functioning through gaze metrics and qualitative assessments, developmental quotient, adaptive behavior, language development, everyday visual-related behavior, parental stress, quality of life, feasibility, acceptability and usability of the intervention. Primary confirmatory efficacy analyses will be conducted exclusively in Study Sample 1. Study Sample 2 - Exploratory Pilot Cohort It is an additional exploratory pilot subgroup including 48 infants and toddlers up to 42 months of age with established peripheral or cerebral visual impairment or both. The objective of this cohort is to evaluate: feasibility, acceptability, usability, adherence, implementation procedures, and preliminary clinical effects of the intervention in a broader clinical population beyond neonates at risk of visual impairment. Participants in the pilot subgroup follow the same assessment and intervention framework and assessment schedule used in the main RCT cohort. However, this exploratory cohort is not powered for confirmatory efficacy analyses. Data derived from this subgroup will primarily be analyzed descriptively and used to inform future refinement and scalability of the intervention model. Intervention Description The intervention is a non-pharmacological, non-invasive, caregiver-mediated developmental program delivered remotely through the VIPPSTAR digital platform over a 6-months period. The platform includes: individualized developmental activities, video demonstrations, audio instructions, e-learning educational materials, secure communication systems, weekly online supervision sessions with clinicians, monitoring tools for adherence and feasibility. Activities are personalized according to each child's developmental profile, visual functioning, and clinical needs, and are integrated into everyday family routines such as play, caregiving interactions, and home activities. Clinicians monitor intervention delivery through the digital platform and adapt activities over time according to child responses and caregiver feedback. Participants allocated to the control group receive standard clinical care according to local institutional practice, including routine follow-up visits and access to clinical communication channels when needed. Study Timeline and Assessments Participants undergo evaluations at: baseline before randomization (T0), post-intervention after 24 weeks (T1), 6-month follow-up after intervention completion (T2). Assessments include: neuro-ophthalmological evaluation including ophthalmological assessment and basic visual functions/ocular motor function evaluation; visual processing speed/ eye-tracking based ocularmotor parameters, developmental testing including the assessment of developmental quotient, adaptive behavior assessment, language assessment, parental stress questionnaires, quality-of-life measures, feasibility, acceptability and usability measures. Outcome assessors and statisticians remain blinded to treatment allocation whenever feasible. Outcomes The co-primary outcomes for the RCT cohort are: Change improvement of visual acuity Change in smooth pursuit function Secondary outcomes evaluate broader neurodevelopmental, neuro-ophthalmological parameters, adaptive behavior, parental stress, quality of life, and feasibility of the digital intervention. Data Management and Data Sharing Study data are collected and managed through a centralized REDCap platform hosted at the University of Brescia. All data are pseudo-anonymized and handled in compliance with GDPR and applicable national regulations. De-identified individual participant data (IPD) underlying published study results may be shared upon reasonable request after publication of the primary analyses. Statistical code, metadata, and data dictionaries may also be shared for academic, non-commercial research purposes. In preparation for multicenter data exchange and digital platform implementation, the consortium is establishing the necessary Data Sharing Agreements, Data Processing Agreements, and software governance procedures among participating institutions and technology providers to ensure secure, compliant, and ethically governed handling of study data. Ethical Considerations The study has received ethics approval from Comitato Etico Territoriale Lombardia 6 (Approval No. VIPPSTAR G1 - NP 6758; approved 4th June 2026). Written informed consent is obtained from parents or legal guardians before participation. Given the non-invasive and caregiver-mediated nature of the intervention, the study is considered minimal risk. Safety monitoring procedures are implemented throughout the study period, including systematic monitoring of adverse events, participant burden, and intervention tolerability.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALVIPPSTAR Digital Early Intervention

A caregiver-mediated digital intervention aimed at promoting visual and neurodevelopmental outcomes in infants at risk of or with visual impairment, within a framework that promotes and strengthens the parent-child/caregiver-child relationship. The intervention includes individualized activities integrated into daily family routines and supported through remote supervision and e-learning content.

Routine clinical care provided according to local healthcare protocols, including follow-up visits and additional evaluations if clinically indicated.Standard intervention protocols according to local healthcare services are allowed.

Sponsors

Università degli Studi di Brescia
Lead SponsorOTHER
ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Brescia, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Centrul Republican de Reabilitare pentru Copii, Moldova
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Vestibular and oculomotor laboratory, Department of Neuroscience, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
National Center for Rare Diseases, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
LIGHT Center, Brescia, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
EODYNE SYSTEMS SL, Barcelona, Spain
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Psychology and Cognitive Science, University of Trento, Rovereto, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Child Neurology and Psychiatry Unit IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
VIPPSTAR Consortium
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors and statisticians will remain blinded to treatment allocation. Caregivers and intervention providers cannot be blinded due to the nature of the intervention.

Intervention model description

This protocol includes: * one randomized controlled trial (Study Sample 1) * one exploratory pilot study (Study Sample 2)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Days to 42 Months
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Study Sample 1 - Infants at Risk of Visual Impairment * Gestational age ≤32 weeks OR full-term/newborns\>32 weeks of age with neonatal distress (Apgar ≤5 at 10 minutes) * NAVEG score ≥3 * At least one neurological or neuroimaging abnormality: * 3 abnormal signs at ATNAT neurological examination OR Abnormal cranial ultrasound findings OR Abnormal MRI findings

Exclusion criteria

Study Sample 1 - Infants at Risk of Visual Impairment * Epileptic encephalopathy * Parents unable to understand local language Inclusion Criteria: Study Sample 2 - Infants/Toddlers With Visual Impairment * Age ≤42 months * Diagnosis of peripheral or cerebral visual impairment * Moderate or severe visual impairment documented by standardized visual acuity testing

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual acuity measured in cycles per degree or decimes, using Teller Acuity Cards or Lea SymbolsBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Assessment of improvement in visual acuity from baseline following the intervention. Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only. Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.
Smooth pursuit assessed on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit)Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Assessment of changes in smooth pursuit eye movements assessed using a clinical evaluation on an ordinal scale (continuous, discontinuous, difficult to elicit). Primary efficacy analyses will be conducted in Study Sample 1 only. Data from Study Sample 2 will be analyzed descriptively and exploratorily.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fixation Stability assessed on an ordinal scale (stable for more than 3s, unstable for less than 3 s, difficult to evoke, not elicited)Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Evaluation of changes in fixation stability using clinical examination (stable for more than 3s, unstable for less than 3 s, difficult to evoke, not elicited)
Fixation Accuracy - eye tracker-based measureTime Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in fixation accuracy using eye tracker
Smooth pursuit velocity - eye tracker-based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in smooth pursuit velocity
Smooth pursuit accuracy - eye tracker-based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in smooth pursuit accuracy
Smooth pursuit number of anticipatory movements - eye tracker based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in smooth pursuit number of anticipatory movements
Saccadic eye movementsBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in saccadic eye movements using a categorial classification: present, normometric with increased latency, dysmetric but with normal latency, dysmetric with increased latency, absent
Contrast sensitivityTime Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in the ability to identify targets, expressed as percentage of contrast level
Binocular visual fieldTime Frame: Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Change in the ability to locate targets presented in different areas of the binocular visual field using clinical examination
Visual Response Latencies - eye-tracker based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in visual response latency
Visual Response Speed - eye-tracker based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes on visual response speed
Visual Response Accuracy - eye-tracker based measureBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes on visual response accuracy
Developmental Quotient at Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development - IV editionBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in cognitive, motor and language quotients at Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development-IV
Developmental Quotient at Reynell Zinkin Scales of visual deficitsBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in Developmental Quotient and subquotients at Reynell Zinkin Scales for infants with visual impairment aged 12 months and older (corrected age)
Adaptive FunctioningBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in raw scores, total quotient and subquotients at Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales-III (VABS-III)
Language DevelopmentBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in the number of understood/spoken words and sentences, changes in the number of gestures as reported at MacArthur-Bates Communicative Development Inventories (MB-CDI) by parents
Everyday visual-related behaviour questionnaire (Preverbal Visual Assessment - PreViAs)Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in the total score and subscores at Preverbal Visual Assessment (PreViAs) questionnaire for infants aged 23 months and younger (corrected age)
Every day visual-related behaviour (CVI Parental Questionnaire)Baseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in the total score and subscores at CVI Parental Questionnaire for infants aged 24 months and older
Parental StressBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in total score and subscores at Parenting Stress Index-4 (PSI-4)
Quality of Life scoresBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1), and 6-month follow-up (T2)Changes in total score and subscores at Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL)
Digital platform usabilityBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)Evaluation of intervention usability through System Usability Scale (SUS)
Intervention acceptabilityBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)Evaluation of intervention acceptability through Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM)
Intervention AppropriatenessBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)Evaluation of intervention appropriateness through Interventio Appropriateness Measure (IAM)
Intervention feasibilityBaseline (T0), post-intervention at 24 weeks (T1)Evaluation of intervention feasibility through Feasibility of Intervention Measures (FIM)

Countries

Belgium, Italy, Moldova

Contacts

CONTACTJessica Galli, Professor
jessica.galli@unibs.it00390303995724
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJessica Galli, Prof

Unit of Child Neurology and Psychiatry, ASST Spedali Civili of Brescia, Italy - Department of clinical and experimental sciences, University of Brescia, Brescia, Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026