Skip to content

PRAISE-IR Versus CIBMTR Controls

Comparison of the PRAISE -IR ("Phase 2 Study of Personalized r-ATG (Rabbit Anti-thymocyte Globulin) Dosing to Improve Survival Through Enhanced Immune Reconstitution in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Ex-vivo CD34-Selected Allogeneic-HCT (Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation) ", NCT04872595) Study Population With CIBMTR Controls

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07717164
Enrollment
51
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2026-07-31
Completion date
2026-09-30
Last updated
2026-07-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

ALL (Acute B-Lymphoblastic Leukemia), AML (Acute Myeloid Leukemia), MDS (Myelodysplastic Syndrome)

Brief summary

The rationale to conduct this RWE study is to provide data to support the safety of CD34 selected grafts versus T replete PBSC transplants to address concerns about increased TRM in CD34 selected graft recipients.

Detailed description

Comparison of the PRAISE -IR ("Phase 2 Study of Personalized r-ATG Dosing to Improve Survival Through Enhanced Immune Reconstitution in Pediatric and Adult Patients Undergoing Ex-vivo CD34-Selected Allogeneic-HCT", NCT04872595) study population with CIBMTR controls

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Miltenyi Biomedicine GmbH
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 66 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Arm A: Model-based ATG dosing CD34-selection (PRAISE-IR population) * Patients who participated in the PRAISE-IR single center phase II study * Patient age at transplant: ≥ 1 year and \< 66 years * HLA 8/8 MRD or MUD * Conditioning intensity: myeloablative * Conditioning regimens: Model-based ATG with TBI/Thiotepa/Cyclophospamide (TBI/Thio/Cy) or Busulfan/Melphalan/Fludarabine (Bu/Mel/Flu). * Morphologic complete remission at the time of alloHCT Arm B: Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (CIBMTR population) * First AlloHCT in the US between 2021-2023 * Patient age at transplant: ≥ 1 year and \< 66 years * Disease: Patients with AML, MDS, and ALL * HLA 8/8 MRD or MUD * Peripheral blood stem cell allograft * Conditioning intensity: myeloablative conditioning * Conditioning regimens: standard dose ATG (2.5 mg/kg/day given on Day -4 and Day -3) * GVHD prophylaxis: ex vivo CD34 selection * Morphologic complete remission at the time of alloHCT Arm B\*:Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (BMT CTN 1301 population) * Patients in BMT CTN 1301, who received the CD34-selected graft * Patient age at transplant: ≥ 1 year and \< 66 years * Disease:Patients with AML, MDS, and ALL * HLA 8/8 MRD or MUD * Peripheral blood stem cell allograft * Conditioning intensity: myeloablative conditioning * Conditoning regmens: TBI/Thiotepa/Cyclophospamide (TBI/Thio/Cy) or Busulfan/Melphalan/Fludarabine (Bu/Mel/Flu) and standard dose ATG (2.5 mg/kg/day given on Day -4 and Day -3) * GVHD prophylaxis: ex vivo CD34 selection * Morphologic complete remission at the time of alloHCT Arm C: Control CIBMTR population * First AlloHCT in the US between 2021-2023 * Patient age at transplant: ≥ 1 year and \< 66 years * Disease:Patients with AML, MDS, and ALL * HLA 8/8 MRD or MUD * Peripheral blood stem cell * Conditioning intensity: myeloablative conditioning * Conditioning regimens: Busulfan/Cyclophosphamide (Bu/Cy), Busulfan/Fludaranbine (Bu/Flu), Cyclophosphamide/TBI (Cy/TBI), TBI/Etopsoside * GVHD prophyalxis: / CNI or PTCy-based * CNI-based: CNI (tacrolimus or ciclosporin) plus MTX * PTCy-based: Cyclophosphamide on day +3 and +4 (50 mg/kg/d) combined with CNI and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)

Exclusion criteria

Patients will be entered into this trial only if they meet none of the following criteria: Arm A: Model-based ATG dosing CD34-selection (PRAISE-IR population) * HLA \<8/8 MRD or MUD Arm B: Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (CIBMTR population) * Patients who participated in the PRAISE-IR study * Patients who did not sign consent for research * Patient transplanted at a center that does not meet CIBMTR data quality standards * Use of CNI-(Tac/MTX) or PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis Arm B\*:Standard ATG dosing CD34-selection (BMT CTN 1301 population) * Patients who did not sign consent for research * Patient transplanted at a center that does not meet CIBMTR data quality standards * Use of CNI- or PTCy-based GVHD prophylaxis Arm C: Control CIBMTR population * Patients who did not sign consent for research * Patient transplanted at a center that does not meet CIBMTR data quality standards * Use of ATG and/or alemtuzumab * Patients who received PTCy with sirolimus (and not a CNI) * Use of ex vivo CD34 selection

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of OS between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control participants who have received a CD34 selected graft and standard dose ATG (Arm B) with the goal of demonstrating superiority of Arm A.two yearsComparison of overall survival (OS) between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control participants who have received a CD34 selected graft and standard dose ATG (Arm B). Note: If the number of participants meeting the criteria for Arm B is insufficient for 1:1 matching, Arm A could be compared with the CD34 selection group from the BMT CTN1301 study (Arm B\*). Comparison of OS between PRAISE-IR study participants (Arm A) with CIBMTR control patients who have received standard of care (SoC) allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) without CD34 selection with post transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) and Calcineurin inhibitor (CNI)/Methotrexate (MTX) for GVHD prophylaxis (Arm C).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Acute GVHD, grades II-IVtwo yearsAcute Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD), grades II-IV
Chronic GVHDtwo yearsChronic Graft-versus-Host Disease (GVHD)
Hematologic recovery (time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment)two yearsHematologic recovery (time to neutrophil engraftment and time to platelet engraftment)
Rate of primary graft failuretwo yearsRate of primary graft failure
Non-relapse mortalitytwo yearsNon-relapse mortality
Relapsetwo yearsRelapse
Relapse-free survivaltwo yearsRelapse-free survival

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTMichaela Malchow
Michaela.Malchow@miltenyi.com+49 15117151746

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 29, 2026