Skip to content

Accuracy of Physical Examination for Assessing Inspiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation

Accuracy of Physical Examination for Assessing Inspiratory Effort During Assisted Ventilation

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07717125
Enrollment
80
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2019-03-11
Completion date
2023-01-21
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Patients Invasively Ventilated Under Pressure Support Ventilation

Brief summary

The aim of this study is to assess whether clinical evaluation can accurately estimate the level of respiratory effort in intubated ICU patients receiving pressure support ventilation.

Detailed description

Insufficient or excessive respiratory effort during assisted ventilation contributes to diaphragm injury and patient self-inflicted lung injury (P-SILI), both of which worsen outcomes. Patients in the transition phase from controlled ventilation to assisted modes are particularly vulnerable because persistent lung injury may drive elevated respiratory effort, pendelluft, and large swings in alveolar pressure. One of the main goals of assisted ventilation is therefore to maintain effort within a physiological range that avoids both over- and under-assistance. During pressure support ventilation (PSV), direct measurement of respiratory effort requires esophageal pressure monitoring, which is rarely feasible in routine care. Other noninvasive approaches, such as diaphragm ultrasound, lack reproducibility and cannot provide continuous monitoring. Airway occlusion pressure has shown promise for identifying both insufficient and excessive effort, but its performance varies across ventilator models. Additional indices, such as the maximal negative swing of airway pressure during end-expiratory occlusion (∆Pocc), or the pressure-muscle index (PMI), are limited by ventilator constraints. In clinical practice, respiratory effort is usually judged clinically at the bedside. However, the accuracy of clinical examination for detecting abnormal effort has never been validated. The investigators hypothesize that bedside clinical assessment is unreliable and may expose patients to inappropriate levels of assistance. The primary aim of this investigation was to determine the accuracy of clinical examination in diagnosing abnormal respiratory effort during PSV.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TESTClinical evaluation of the respiratory effort by the physician and nurse in charge of the patient

The clinician and the nurse in charge of the patient evaluate the respiratory effort

Sponsors

Centre Hospitalier Saint Joseph Saint Luc de Lyon
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients mechanically ventilated for at least 48 hours * switched to pressure support ventilation within the previous 48 hours

Exclusion criteria

* pregnancy * legal protection status * refusal by the patient or relatives to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Diagnostic performance (sensitivity, specificity) of the clinical evaluation in diagnosing excessive respiratory effort and insufficient respiratory effortBaselineThe physician in charge of the patient will be asked to categorize the patient respiratory effort as normal, insufficient or excessive, based on his/her clinical evaluation. Esophageal pressure will be recorded at the same time, using an esophageal catheter. Esophageal pressure time product will then be computed and considered the reference standard for respiratory effort quantification. Sensitivity and Specificity of the clinical evaluation to diagnose excessive or insufficcient effort will be computed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
MortalityDay 28Mortality

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026