Skip to content

ASPB-PIPB Combination in Cardiac Surgery

Effects of Combined Anterior Serratus Plane and Pectoral-Intercostal Plane Blocks on Perioperative Analgesia and Enhanced Recovery After Surgery in Cardiopulmonary Bypass Surgery

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07716943
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-06-30
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cardiac Surgery, Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Median Sternotomy, Postoperative Pain

Keywords

Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Postoperative Pain, Regional Anesthesia, Enhanced Recovery After Surgery

Brief summary

Cardiopulmonary bypass surgery is associated with significant postoperative pain, which may adversely affect respiratory function, delay mobilization, prolong hospital stay, and increase postoperative complications. Within Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols, multimodal analgesia and opioid-sparing strategies have become essential components of perioperative care. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks, including the anterior serratus plane block (ASPB) and pectoral-intercostal plane block (PIPB), have emerged as effective and safe regional anesthesia techniques for cardiac surgery, targeting different sensory innervation of the thoracic wall. However, evidence regarding the combined use of these two blocks remains limited. This study aimed to evaluate whether the combination of ASPB and PIPB improves intraoperative and postoperative analgesia, reduces opioid consumption, and enhances postoperative recovery and ERAS outcomes compared with standard analgesic management in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Detailed description

Cardiac surgery performed with cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is associated with substantial perioperative nociceptive stimulation originating from median sternotomy, chest tube placement, internal mammary artery harvesting, and extensive mediastinal tissue manipulation. Despite advances in surgical techniques and perioperative care, postoperative pain remains a major challenge following cardiac surgery. Inadequately controlled pain contributes to impaired respiratory mechanics, ineffective coughing, reduced pulmonary function, delayed mobilization, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) and hospital stay, and an increased incidence of postoperative pulmonary complications. Furthermore, excessive perioperative opioid administration may lead to respiratory depression, postoperative nausea and vomiting, ileus, delirium, and delayed recovery, highlighting the need for effective opioid-sparing analgesic strategies. Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) protocols have increasingly been adopted in cardiac surgery with the aim of reducing perioperative stress, minimizing complications, and accelerating functional recovery. Contemporary ERAS guidelines emphasize multimodal analgesia as a cornerstone of perioperative management, integrating regional anesthesia techniques with non-opioid systemic analgesics to reduce opioid consumption while improving pain control. Ultrasound-guided fascial plane blocks have gained considerable popularity because they are technically straightforward, provide effective thoracic analgesia, and have a favorable safety profile compared with neuraxial techniques in anticoagulated cardiac surgical patients. Among these techniques, the anterior serratus plane block (ASPB) effectively anesthetizes the lateral thoracic wall by blocking the lateral cutaneous branches of the intercostal nerves, whereas the pectoral-intercostal plane block (PIPB) primarily targets the anterior cutaneous branches responsible for pain arising from median sternotomy. Given their complementary anatomical distributions, combining ASPB and PIPB may provide more comprehensive analgesic coverage of both the anterior and lateral thoracic walls. Although both ASPB and PIPB have individually demonstrated promising analgesic efficacy in cardiac surgery, evidence regarding the combined use of these two fascial plane blocks remains limited. Whether the addition of ASPB to PIPB results in superior perioperative analgesia, reduced opioid requirements, improved postoperative recovery, and enhanced compliance with ERAS pathways has not yet been clearly established. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare the effects of combined anterior serratus plane block and pectoral-intercostal plane block with standard analgesic management on intraoperative opioid consumption, postoperative pain scores, postoperative analgesic requirements, recovery parameters, and ERAS-related outcomes in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Interventions

PROCEDURECombined ASPB and PIPB

Ultrasound-guided bilateral anterior serratus plane block combined with bilateral pectoral-intercostal plane block performed after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision to provide perioperative multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

PROCEDUREAnterior Serratus Plane Block

Ultrasound-guided bilateral anterior serratus plane block performed after induction of general anesthesia and before surgical incision to provide perioperative analgesia in patients undergoing cardiopulmonary bypass surgery.

Sponsors

Sisli Hamidiye Etfal Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients undergoing open heart surgery via median sternotomy by the Cardiovascular Surgery Clinic * Patients over 18 years of age * ASA II-III patients

Exclusion criteria

* \- Patients undergoing emergency or recurrent surgery * Patients with left ventricular ejection fraction \< 30 * Patients who died per-operatively * Patients who do not provide informed consent * Presence of chronic pain * Presence of allergy to local anesthetics * Presence of infection in the area where the block will be performed * Coagulopathy * Pre-existing neurological deficit * Mental retardation * Anatomical deformity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative pain intensityAt extubation (0 hour) and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery.Postoperative pain intensity will be assessed at rest and during coughing using the Visual Analog Scale at extubation (0 hour) and at 4, 8, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The Visual Analog Scale ranges from 0 to 10 cm, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity and therefore a worse outcome.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intraoperative fentanyl consumptionFrom induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery.Total dose of fentanyl administered from the induction of anesthesia until the end of surgery. Fentanyl consumption will be recorded in micrograms.
Postoperative tramadol consumptionDuring the first 24 hours after surgery.Cumulative dose of tramadol administered for rescue analgesia during the first 24 hours after surgery. Tramadol consumption will be recorded in milligrams.
Time to extubationFrom the end of surgery until extubation, assessed up to 7 days after surgery.Time elapsed from the end of surgery until successful removal of the endotracheal tube. Time to extubation will be recorded in hours.
Intensive care unit length of stayFrom postoperative intensive care unit admission until intensive care unit discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Time elapsed from postoperative admission to the intensive care unit until discharge from the intensive care unit. Length of stay will be recorded in days.
Hospital length of stayFrom the date of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Time elapsed from the date of surgery until discharge from the hospital. Hospital length of stay will be recorded in days.
Incidence of postoperative cardiac arrhythmiasFrom the end of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Number of participants who develop a new postoperative cardiac arrhythmia documented by electrocardiography or continuous cardiac monitoring during the index hospitalization. Results will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one cardiac arrhythmia.
Incidence of block-related complicationsFrom block administration until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Number of participants who develop at least one complication related to the regional anesthesia procedure, including local anesthetic systemic toxicity, vascular puncture, hematoma, infection, pneumothorax, or nerve injury. Results will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one block-related complication.
Incidence of postoperative surgical complicationsFrom the end of surgery until hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Number of participants who develop at least one postoperative surgical complication during the index hospitalization. Results will be reported as the number and percentage of participants with at least one surgical complication.
Time to thoracic drain removalFrom the end of surgery until removal of all thoracic drains, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Time elapsed from the end of surgery until removal of all thoracic drains. Time to thoracic drain removal will be recorded in hours.
Time to urinary catheter removalFrom the end of surgery until urinary catheter removal, assessed up to 30 days after surgery.Time elapsed from the end of surgery until removal of the urinary catheter. Time to urinary catheter removal will be recorded in hours.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

CONTACTMUSTAFA ALTINAY
m_altinay@yahoo.com05333914422
STUDY_CHAIRLEYLA KILINC

şişli etfal eğitim araştırma hastanesi

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026