Skip to content

Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Versus Standard Care in Patients With Pericarditis

Comparative Effects of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Versus Standard Care on Pain, Dyspnea, Cough Severity, Fatigue, and Anxiety in Patients With Pericarditis: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07716696
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-07-21
Start date
2025-12-11
Completion date
2026-10-16
Last updated
2026-07-21

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Pericarditis

Keywords

Pulmonary Rehabilitation, Pericarditis, Dyspnea, Chest Pain, Fatigue, Cough, Anxiety

Brief summary

Pericarditis is associated with symptoms such as chest pain, dyspnea, fatigue, cough, and anxiety, which can significantly impair functional capacity and quality of life. Pulmonary rehabilitation is a structured intervention designed to improve respiratory function and overall physical performance. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation versus standard care in improving clinical symptoms and functional outcomes in patients with pericarditis.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled trial evaluates the comparative effectiveness of pulmonary rehabilitation and standard care in patients diagnosed with pericarditis. Participants are allocated into two groups: an intervention group receiving pulmonary rehabilitation and a control group receiving standard medical care. Pulmonary rehabilitation includes breathing exercises, aerobic training, and patient education aimed at improving respiratory efficiency and reducing symptom burden. Such programs are widely used to improve functional capacity and quality of life in clinical populations \[1\]. Outcome measures include pain intensity, dyspnea, cough severity, fatigue, and anxiety, assessed using validated tools such as the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire. Assessments will be conducted at baseline and after completion of the intervention period.

Interventions

OTHERPulmonary Rehabilitation

A structured program including breathing exercises, aerobic conditioning, and patient education administered over multiple weeks.

OTHERStandard Care

Routine clinical management as prescribed by the treating physician without additional rehabilitation protocol.

Sponsors

University of Lahore
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Outcome assessors are blinded to group allocation to reduce bias.

Intervention model description

Participants are randomly assigned to either pulmonary rehabilitation or standard care groups and followed over the intervention period.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Diagnosed with pericarditis Age between 18-65 years Both male and female participants Medically stable Able to participate in rehabilitation Willing to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Severe cardiovascular or respiratory instability Other major pulmonary diseases Recent surgery or trauma Neurological disorders affecting participation Unwillingness to participate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dyspnea SeverityBaseline and 8 weeksMeasured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain IntensityBaseline and 8 weeksMeasured using VAS
Cough SeverityBaseline and 8 weeksMeasured using McMaster Cough Severity Questionnaire
FatigueTime Frame: Baseline and 8 weeksMeasured using VAS or standardized fatigue scale
AnxietyTime Frame: Baseline and 8 weeksMeasured using a validated anxiety scale

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 22, 2026