Skip to content

Comparing Two Weight Loss Programs for the Prevention of Kidney Cancer Progression Among Patients With Small Renal Masses on Active Surveillance

Development and Analysis of Weight Loss Programs for Renal Cell Carcinoma Patients on Active Surveillance

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07714018
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-07-20
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2028-09-01
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Renal Cell Carcinoma (RCC)

Brief summary

This clinical trial compares two different weight-loss programs, daily continuous calorie energy reduction (CER) versus (vs.) 5:2 intermittent fasting (IF), in preventing progression of kidney (renal) cancer among patients with one or more small renal masses (SRM) undergoing active surveillance (AS). Kidney cancer patients tend to have changes in metabolism that may increase body weight, but weight-loss strategies that work for best for these patients are unknown. The CER program requires a set daily limit for calories. The IF program requires fasting for 2 days a week and normal eating for the remaining 5 days. Both will include self-monitoring with interventionist feedback. This trial may help researchers determine whether the IF program works better than the CER program in improving weight loss, physical health, and/or reducing the risk of kidney cancer progression among patients with small renal masses undergoing AS

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. Adapt two evidence-based behavioral weight loss intervention programs (IF and CER) with a goal to cause weight loss in SRM patients on AS. II. Determine the feasibility of the two intervention programs (IF and CER). SECONDARY OBJECTIVE: I. Measure and explore preliminary effect sizes of IF vs. CER on body weight, diet, body composition, tumor growth, and rates of clinical progression and invasive treatment conversion

Interventions

OTHERIntermittent Fasting

The IF intervention will instruct participants how to fast safely, how to conduct a 5:2 fast, and encourage moderate physical activity. Self-monitoring with interventionist feedback will also be included

Lessons about lowering caloric intake each day and moderate physical activity with self-monitoring and interventionist feedback

Sponsors

Roswell Park Cancer Institute
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* English speaking * SRM patient with biopsy-confirmed RCC who are initiating or already on AS for less than 5 years * Age 18 years or older * Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 25 kg/m\^2 * No medical problems that might contraindicate participation in a behavioral weight reduction program containing an exercise component * No current medication that might affect weight loss * Not pregnant or lactating * No more than 5% body weight loss in the past 3 months * No bariatric surgery in the last 10 years

Exclusion criteria

* Non-English speaking * Less than 18 years old * BMI \< 25 kg/m\^2 * Medical problems that might contraindicate participation in a behavioral weight reduction program containing an exercise component * Current medication that might affect weight loss * Pregnant or lactating * More than 105% body weight loss in the past 6 months * Bariatric surgery in the last 10 years * Medical conditions that might contraindicate short-term fasting periods * Unwilling or unable to follow protocol requirements * Received an investigational agent within 30 days prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Participation RateAt 6 monthsThis will assess the rate of eligible persons who enroll after invitation and the mean proportion of intervention components completed by arm and participant

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in tumor sizeAt baseline and at 6 monthsWill be assessed based on radiologic imaging. Within-group differences between baseline and 6 months will be examined using paired t-tests or Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous variables, and McNemar's test for categorical variables.
Rate of clinical progressionUp to 6 monthsdefined based on radiologic tumor size (\> 4 cm), stage (\> cT1a) and growth rate (\> 5 mm/year for \< 3 cm size; \> 3 mm/year for tumor size \> 3 cm), in addition to biopsy histology (high grade or unclassified renal cell carcinoma histologic subtype) and patient symptomology (bleeding or paraneoplastic symptoms/signs attributable to the tumor), as per the International Consultation for Urologic Disease guidelines
Recall of Dietary IntakeBaseline and 6 monthsParticipants will complete 3 recalls over the phone regarding dietary intake over a prior 24-hour period.
Change in Body compositionBaseline and at 6 monthsWill be measured using a body composition monitor, which uses bioelectrical impedance analysis to measure whole body and segmental body composition, including trunk fat..

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026