Skip to content

Blood Clotting Markers and Heart Ultrasound in People With Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation

Device-Detected Atrial Fibrillation - Haemostatic Profile and Echocardiographic Variables

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07713615
Acronym
DDAF-HEV
Enrollment
222
Registered
2026-07-20
Start date
2026-02-27
Completion date
2037-09-01
Last updated
2026-07-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial High Rate Episodes, Device-detected Atrial Fibrillation, Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Stroke risk, Thromboembolism, ABC-stroke score, Haemostasis, Thrombin generation, von Willebrand factor, Echocardiography, Left atrial function, Cardiac implantable electronic devices, Oral anticoagulation, Biomarkers, Atrial fibrillation burden, CHA₂DS₂-VASc, CHA₂DS₂-VA

Brief summary

The purpose of this observational study is to investigate whether blood tests related to blood clotting are associated with established clinical stroke risk scores, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation recorded by an implanted cardiac device, and ultrasound measurements of the heart in people with device-detected atrial fibrillation. The study will also evaluate whether these baseline measurements are associated with future clinical outcomes and may improve future stroke risk assessment. Device-detected atrial fibrillation is an irregular heart rhythm detected by implanted cardiac devices such as pacemakers, implantable cardiac monitors, and implantable defibrillators. It is often brief and does not cause symptoms. Although it increases the risk of stroke and systemic embolism, the risk is lower than in people with clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation. As a result, it remains difficult to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from blood-thinning medication, which reduces the risk of stroke but also increases the risk of bleeding. The study will include 222 participants with implanted cardiac devices, including 111 participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and 111 age-, sex-, and cardiac device indication-matched control participants without device-detected atrial fibrillation. At baseline, participants will undergo blood sampling, ultrasound examination of the heart, and routine device interrogation. Information on medical history and established clinical stroke risk factors will also be collected. The implanted cardiac device will be used to determine the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation recorded during the year before study inclusion. The baseline analyses will investigate whether established clinical stroke risk scores, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and heart ultrasound findings are associated with changes in blood clotting that may indicate an increased tendency to form blood clots. The study will evaluate both primary and additional blood clotting markers to improve the understanding of the biological mechanisms underlying thromboembolic risk in device-detected atrial fibrillation. Participants will subsequently be followed for 10 years to determine whether baseline blood clotting markers, the total amount of device-detected atrial fibrillation, heart ultrasound findings, and clinical stroke risk scores are associated with future clinical outcomes, including stroke, systemic embolism, hospitalization, death, progression to clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy. The findings may improve the understanding of thromboembolic risk in people with device-detected atrial fibrillation and support the development of more individualized approaches to future stroke risk assessment and treatment.

Detailed description

Scientific Rationale Device-detected atrial fibrillation (DDAF) is associated with an increased risk of stroke and systemic embolism, although the risk is lower than in patients with clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation. Consequently, it remains challenging to identify which patients are most likely to benefit from oral anticoagulant therapy while minimizing the risk of bleeding. Current stroke risk assessment in patients with device-detected atrial fibrillation relies primarily on clinical risk scores and does not incorporate haemostatic biomarkers, the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, or echocardiographic markers of atrial remodeling that may contribute to thromboembolic risk. This study aims to improve the understanding of thromboembolic risk in patients with DDAF and to evaluate whether integrating clinical stroke risk scores, DDAF burden, advanced echocardiographic variables, and haemostatic biomarkers may improve future stroke risk assessment. Study Design This is a prospective, single-center observational cohort study conducted at the Department of Cardiology, Esbjerg and Grindsted Hospital, University Hospital of Southern Denmark, in collaboration with the Unit for Thrombosis Research, Department of Clinical Diagnostics. The study consists of a single prospective observational cohort with three prespecified baseline analyses followed by a prospective 10-year longitudinal follow-up. A total of 222 participants will be enrolled, including 111 participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and 111 control participants matched for age, sex, and indication for cardiac device implantation. Baseline Assessments At baseline, all participants will undergo standardized blood sampling, comprehensive transthoracic echocardiography, and collection of demographic and clinical information. Device interrogation will be performed to quantify the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation. Clinical thromboembolic risk will be assessed using the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score. In addition, the ABC-stroke score will be calculated to evaluate its associations with haemostatic biomarkers and subsequent clinical outcomes in participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation. Independent variables in the prespecified baseline analyses include the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score, the ABC-stroke score, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and advanced echocardiographic variables. The baseline analyses are designed to address three prespecified objectives. Together, these analyses are intended to determine whether established clinical stroke risk scores, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, and cardiac structural and functional abnormalities are associated with a more prothrombotic haemostatic profile. 1. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers, endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and von Willebrand factor antigen, differ between participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and matched controls and whether they are associated with the CHA₂DS₂-VASc and ABC-stroke risk scores. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between additional haemostatic biomarkers and the clinical stroke risk scores. 2. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers are associated with the burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between DDAF burden and additional haemostatic biomarkers. 3. To investigate whether the primary haemostatic biomarkers are associated with advanced echocardiographic variables, including left atrial size and function. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations between echocardiographic variables and additional haemostatic biomarkers. The primary cross-sectional outcome measures are endogenous thrombin potential (ETP) and von Willebrand factor antigen. Secondary cross-sectional outcome measures comprise additional biomarkers of coagulation and fibrinolysis. Longitudinal Follow-up Participants will subsequently be followed for 10 years through electronic health records, routine device interrogation reports, and Danish national health registries. Follow-up data will be collected every second year to evaluate whether baseline primary and secondary haemostatic biomarkers, DDAF burden, clinical stroke risk scores, and echocardiographic findings are associated with subsequent stroke, systemic embolism, hospitalization, death, progression to clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation, and initiation of oral anticoagulant therapy. Statistical Analysis The sample size was calculated to provide 80% statistical power at a two-sided significance level of 5% to detect the expected differences in endogenous thrombin potential and von Willebrand factor antigen between predefined CHA₂DS₂-VASc stroke risk groups, based on previously published effect sizes. Continuous variables will be assessed for normality using histograms and Q-Q plots. Variables with skewed distributions will be logarithmically transformed where appropriate. Homogeneity of variances will be assessed before parametric analyses. Continuous variables will be summarized as mean ± standard deviation or median with interquartile range according to data distribution, whereas categorical variables will be summarized as frequencies and percentages. Baseline comparisons between participants with device-detected atrial fibrillation and matched controls will be performed using appropriate parametric or non-parametric statistical methods according to data distribution. Multivariable regression models will be adjusted for predefined confounding variables as appropriate. The prespecified baseline analyses will primarily be performed using multivariable linear regression models with endogenous thrombin potential and von Willebrand factor antigen as the primary dependent variables. Secondary analyses will evaluate associations with additional haemostatic biomarkers. Regression models will be adjusted for prespecified confounding variables. Continuous predictors will be assessed for approximate linearity, and the assumptions underlying the linear regression models will be evaluated before interpretation of the results. Sensitivity analyses will be performed to evaluate the robustness of the primary findings. Adjustment for multiple testing will be performed using the Holm-Bonferroni procedure. Longitudinal analyses will evaluate whether baseline haemostatic biomarkers, burden of device-detected atrial fibrillation, clinical stroke risk scores, and echocardiographic findings are associated with subsequent clinical outcomes. Time-to-event analyses will be performed using Cox proportional hazards regression models when appropriate. Hazard ratios with 95% confidence intervals will be reported. Statistical significance will be defined as a two-sided p-value \<0.05.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Andreas Sjøholm-Christensen
Lead SponsorOTHER
Sydvestjysk Kardiologisk Fond
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Grosserer L.F. Foghts Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Region of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorOTHER
Karola Jørgensens Foundation and Foundation for Cardiology in Southwest Denmark.
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The A.P. Moeller Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
OPEN, Open Patient data Explorative Network, Odense University Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The Simon Spies Foundation
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
The foundation of Fam. Kjærsgaard, Sunds
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age \> 50 years at inclusion * Implanted cardiac device with an atrial electrode * ≥1 episode of device-detected atrial fibrillation lasting ≥1 minute, detected at routine cardiac device interrogation within the last 12 months * Written informed consent obtained prior to inclusion

Exclusion criteria

* History of ECG-documented atrial fibrillation at any time prior to inclusion * Use of oral anticoagulation or dual antiplatelet therapy within 6 months prior to inclusion, irrespective of indication * Current treatment with oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy * Pregnancy or breastfeeding * End-stage renal disease (creatinine clearance \<15 mL/min, calculated using the Cockcroft-Gault equation) * Active malignancy, defined as cancer diagnosis not followed by curative treatment within 6 months of diagnosis * Major surgery within the last 3 months * Connective tissue disease requiring treatment * Acute coronary syndrome, stroke/transient ischemic attack, or venous thromboembolism within 3 months prior to inclusion * Known thrombophilia * Clinically significant hepatic or hematological disease requiring treatment and/or specialist follow-up * Mechanical heart valve, moderate-to-severe mitral stenosis, or other valvular disease requiring intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Thrombin generation assessed by endogenous thrombin potentialBaselineThrombin generation plays a pivotal role in blood clotting and thus serve as primary outcome measure. Thrombin generation will be assessed through measurement of endogenous thrombin potential (nmol/L x min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Levels of von Willebrand factor (vWF) antigenBaselinevon Willebrand factor plays an important role in platelet plug formation. von Willebrand factor antigen (%) will be measured using an in-house immunoassay.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Plasma P-selectin ConcentrationBaselinePlasma concentration of soluble P-selectin antigen (ng/ml) measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). P-selectin will only be measured in participants with elevated von Willebrand factor antigen concentrations.
Thrombin generation assessed by lag timeBaseline.Thrombin generation plays a pivotal role in blood clotting. Thrombin generation will be assessed through measurement of lag time (min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Thrombin generation assessed by peak thrombin concentrationBaselineThrombin generation plays a pivotal role in blood clotting. Thrombin generation will be assessed through measurement of peak thrombin concentration (nmol/L), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Thrombin generation assessed by time to peakBaselineThrombin generation plays a pivotal role in blood clotting. Thrombin generation will be assessed through measurement of time to peak (min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Kallikrein generation assessed by lag timeBaselineKallikrein generation plays an important role in the contact activation system of the secondary hemostasis. Kallikrein generation will be assessed through measurement of lag time (min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
High-sensitivity Cardiac Troponin T (hs-cTnT) ConcentrationBaselinePlasma concentration of high-sensitivity cardiac troponin T (hs-cTnT) in ng/L measured at baseline
Kallikrein generation assessed by peak kallikrein concentrationBaselineKallikrein generation plays an important role in the contact activation system of the secondary hemostasis. Kallikrein generation will be assessed through measurement of peak kallikrein concentration (nmol/L), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Kallikrein generation assessed by time to peakBaselineKallikrein generation plays an important role in the contact activation system of the secondary hemostasis. Kallikrein generation will be assessed through measurement of time to peak (min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Kallikrein generation assessed by endogenous kallikrein potentialBaselineKallikrein generation plays an important role in the contact activation system of the secondary hemostasis. Kallikrein generation will be assessed through measurement of endogenous kallikrein potential (nmol/L\*min), using the calibrated automated thrombography (CAT) method.
Concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2BaselineActivation of the inactive prothrombin to the active thrombin will be estimated from concentrations of prothrombin fragment 1 + 2 (pmol/L), using a commercial enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of cleaved high-molecular weight kininogen (cHK)BaselinecHK is an essential component of the contact activation system of the coagulation cascade. cHK (µg/ml) will be measured with the help of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of coagulation factor XII (FXII)BaselineFXII is an essential component of the contact activation system of the coagulation cascade. FXII (µg/ml) will be measured with the help of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of prekallikreinBaselinePrekallikrein is an essential component of the contact activation system of the coagulation cascade. Prekallikrein (µg/ml) will be measured with the help of enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of high-molecular weight kininogen (HK)BaselineHK plays a key role in the contact activation system of the coagulation cascade. HK (%) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of C1-inhibitorBaselineC1-inhibitor is the main regulator of the contact activation system. Concentration of C1-inhibitor (g/L) will be measured using nephelometry.
Concentration of coagulation factor VII (FVII)BaselineFVII plays an important role in the secondary hemostasis. Concentration of FVII (%) will be measured using clot assay.
Concentration of coagulation factor X (FX)BaselineFX plays an important role in the secondary hemostasis. Concentration of FX (%) will be measured using clot assay.
Concentration of coagulation factor II (FII)BaselineFII plays an important role in the secondary hemostasis. Concentration of FII (%) will be measured using clot assay.
Concentration of protein CBaselineProtein C is essential for the regulation of the blood coagulation cascade. Concentration of protein C (%) will be measured using chromogenic assay.
Concentration of protein SBaselineProtein S is essential for the regulation of the blood coagulation cascade. Concentration of protein S (%) will be measured using turbidity.
Concentration of antithrombin (AT)BaselineAntithrombin is essential for the regulation of the blood coagulation cascade. Concentration of antithrombin (%) will be measured using chromogenic assay.
Concentration of tissue factor pathway inhibitor (TFPI)BaselineTFPI is important in the regulation of the blood coagulation system. TFPI (pg/ml) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Fibrin turnover assessed by maximum lysis velocity (Vmax)BaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of Vmax (optical density (OD)/min) will be conducted.
Fibrin turnover assessed by peak optical density (OD)BaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of peak OD (OD) will be conducted.
Fibrin turnover assessed by clot lysisBaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of clot lysis (%) will be conducted.
Fibrin turnover assessed by overall hemostatic potential (OHP)BaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of OHP (OD x min) will be conducted.
Fibrin turnover assessed by fiber diameterBaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of fiber diameter (µm) will be conducted.
Fibrin turnover assessed by fiber densityBaselineFibrin turnover will be assessed through fibrin clot lysis, where measurement of fiber density (x 10\^6 Da/cm\^3) will be conducted.
Concentration of fibrinogenBaselineConversion of fibrinogen to fibrin, in which thrombin plays a key role, is essential for blood coagulation. Concentrations of fibrinogen (µmol/L) will be measured using nephelometry.
Concentration of D-dimerBaselineD-dimer is a fibrin degradation product that reflects the fibrinolysis process (the breakdown of fibrin network), which plays a crucial role in preventing blood clots from causing complications. D-dimer (mg/L) will be measured using immunoassay.
Concentration of tissue-type plasminogen activator (t-PA)Baselinet-PA is a protein that stimulates the breakdown of blood clots. It helps convert plasminogen into its active form, plasmin, the major enzyme responsible for the breakdown of blood clots. Concentration of t-PA (ng/ml) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Concentration of plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 (PAI-1)BaselinePAI-1 functions as the inhibitor of t-PA, which will stimulate the formation of blood clots. Concentration of PAI-1 (ng/ml) will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
Levels of plasminogenBaselinePlasminogen is the inactive form of plasmin, the major enzyme that breaks down blood clots. Levels of plasminogen (%) will be measured using chromogenic assay.
Levels of coagulation factor XIII (FXIII)BaselineFXIII plays a key role in stabilizing the blood clots. Levels of FXIII will be measured using immunoassay.
Levels of plasmin inhibitor (PI)BaselinePI is the major inhibitor of plasmin. Levels of PI (%) will be measured using chromogenic assay.
Levels of thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor (TAFI)BaselineTAFI is an enzyme that is activated by thrombin, which downregulates fibrinolysis, stimulating blood clot formation. Levels TAFI will be measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).
ADAMTS13 Antigen ConcentrationBaselinePlasma concentration of ADAMTS13 antigen (ng/mL) measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). ADAMTS13 will only be measured in participants with elevated von Willebrand factor antigen concentrations.
N-terminal Pro-B-type Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP) ConcentrationBaselinePlasma concentration of N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) in ng/L measured at baseline.
StrokeUp to 10 years.Clinical stroke verified with imaging e.g. CT or MR.
Transient Ischemic AttackUp to 10 yearsTransient Ischemic Attack verified with imaging e.g. CT or MR
Systemic embolismUp to 10 yearsSystemic embolism verified with imaging e.g. CT, MR or ultrasound
HospitalizationsUp to 10 yearsAll cause hospitalizations
Heart failure hospitalizationsUp to 10 yearsNew onset or worsening of heart failure leading to hospitalization or urgent visit heart failure clinic
All-cause mortalityUp to 10 yearsAll-cause mortality
Cardiovascular deathUp to 10 yearsCardiovascular death
Progression to clinically diagnosed atrial fibrillation or atrial flutterUp to 10 yearsAtrial fibrillation or flutter verified by a 12-lead ECG or ambulatory ECG monitoring
Progression to >24 hours device-detected atrial fibrillationUp to 10 years.Progression to \>24 hours device-detected atrial fibrillation at a scheduled out-of hospital or acute cardiac device interrogation
Initiation of oral anticoagulant therapyUp to 10 yearsInitiation of oral anticoagulant therapy with minimum 3 months treatment duration.
Pulmonary embolismUp to 10 yearsPulmonary embolism verified with imaging e.g. CT or V/Q scan
Deep venous thrombosisUp to 10 yearsDeep venous thrombosis verified with radiology e.g. ultrasound or CT

Countries

Denmark

Contacts

CONTACTAndreas Sjøholm-Christensen, MD
andreas.sjoholm-christensen@rsyd.dk+45 71776422
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndreas Sjøholm-Christensen, MD

Region of Southern Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 21, 2026