Skip to content

Effect of GMI With and Without NM on LE in Cancer Patients With CIPN

Effect of Graded Motor Imagery With and Without Neural Mobilization on Lower Extremity in Cancer Patients With Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07712302
Acronym
CIPN
Enrollment
48
Registered
2026-07-17
Start date
2025-03-01
Completion date
2025-06-06
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cancer, Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy (CIPN)

Keywords

Cancer, Neural Mobilization, Graded Motor Imagery, Neuropathic pain, Nerve gliding, Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy, Sensory Ataxia

Brief summary

The goal of this interventional study is to learn if graded motor imagery with or without added neural mobilization can treat chemotherapy induced nerve related symptoms in lower limbs of cancer patients. The main questions it aims to answer are: \- Does graded motor imagery yields any added effects in relieving nerve related symptoms due to chemotherapy in lower limbs of cancer patients to the effects of nerve mobilization? Researchers will compare the effects of graded motor imagery as a standalone therapy (Group A) to the effects of graded motor imagery with nerve mobilization (Group B) Participants will take treatment sessions according to their allocated group, two sessions per week for six weeks.

Interventions

Graded motor imagery is a series of three steps. The first step, lateral recognition, includes graded left and right judgment exercises. The second step involves imagining the performance of movements and the third, and last step involves performing movements in front of a mirror.

OTHERNeural Mobilization

Nerve mobilization allows movement between structures of nervous system and its surrounding areas. It is used to mobilize the nervous system and maintain equilibrium inside the nervous system as well as in structures present in its surroundings.

Sponsors

University of Faisalabad
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Intervention model description

Group A was given graded motor imagery Group B was given graded motor imagery with neural mobilization

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
31 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Both male and female * Age ranging from 31 to 65 years * Diagnosed cancer patients (stage 1 to 3, cancer of any kind) * Chemotherapy sessions (antineoplastic drugs) - at least 1 session * Presence of glove and stocking peripheral neuropathy * LANSS score greater than 12 * Agreed to give complete follow-up

Exclusion criteria

* Any co-morbid conditions that can cause peripheral neuropathy e.g. diabetes, chronic kidney failure * Any trauma history that can cause peripheral neuropathic symptoms * Pre-existing nerve entrapment syndromes * Diagnosed stage 4 cancer patients * Cancer patients taking palliative chemotherapy

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LANSSBaseline, week 3 (mid-intervention), week 6 (post intervention)Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Sign

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Romberg TestBaseline, week 6 (post-intervention)Quantitative version of Romberg Test
EORTC-QLQ-CIPN20Baseline, week 6 (post-intervention)European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer-Quality of Life Questionnaire-Chemotherapy Induced Peripheral Neuropathy 20

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026