Skip to content

Brief SEE FAR CBT Intervention Compared With Treatment as Usual for Adults With PTSD

A Clinical Study Evaluating the Effects of a Brief SEE FAR CBT Intervention Compared With Dynamic Psychotherapy Treatment as Usual on Psychological Outcomes in Adults With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07710573
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-07-17
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2028-03-01
Last updated
2026-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Post Traumatic Stress Disorder

Keywords

PTSD, Brief SEE FAR CBT, Intervention

Brief summary

This clinical intervention study evaluates a newly developed Brief SEE FAR CBT protocol for adults aged 18 years and older with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), compared with dynamic psychotherapy treatment as usual. Participants in the Brief SEE FAR CBT group will receive 6 focused sessions emphasizing intrusive PTSD symptoms and will then continue to complete the full 12-session SEE FAR CBT protocol. Participants in the control group will receive dynamic psychotherapy as treatment as usual. Psychological outcomes will be assessed using self-report questionnaires at four time points: baseline, after 6 sessions, after 12 sessions, and at a 3-month follow-up. The study aims to examine changes in PTSD symptoms, anxiety, depression, perceived stress, resilience, somatic symptoms, sleep quality, and related psychological outcomes over the course of treatment and follow-up.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALBrief SEE FAR CBT Intervention

Brief SEE FAR CBT is a focused trauma-oriented cognitive-behavioral intervention based on the SEE FAR CBT approach. The brief protocol consists of 6 sessions delivered approximately once weekly, with emphasis on intrusive PTSD symptoms. Participants will then continue treatment to complete the full 12-session SEE FAR CBT protocol.

BEHAVIORALDynamic Psychotherapy Treatment as Usual

Participants will receive dynamic psychotherapy as treatment as usual, delivered approximately once weekly. This comparison condition represents the standard psychological treatment provided to participants in this clinical setting.

Sponsors

Community Stress Prevention Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
Tel Hai College
CollaboratorOTHER
The Center for Psychological Services Sha'ar Hanegev
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be assigned to one of two parallel groups. One group will receive the Brief SEE FAR CBT protocol followed by completion of the full 12-session SEE FAR CBT protocol. The comparison group will receive dynamic psychotherapy as treatment as usual.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Participants must meet all of the following criteria: * Age 18 years or older * PTSD symptoms, defined as a PCL-5 score of 30-60 * Hebrew-speaking * Able to provide informed consent * Willing and able to participate in the assigned psychological intervention and complete study questionnaires at baseline, after 6 sessions, after 12 sessions, and at 3-month follow-up

Exclusion criteria

Participants will be excluded if they meet any of the following criteria: * Pregnancy at the time of enrollment, due to the potential influence of pregnancy and childbirth during the treatment or follow-up period on psychological outcomes * Currently receiving psychotherapy of any type that began less than 3 months prior to enrollment * Initiation of psychiatric medication less than 3 months prior to enrollment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in PTSD symptomsBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionPTSD Checklist for DSM-5 (PCL-5) PTSD symptoms will be assessed using the PCL-5. Total scores range from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating greater PTSD symptom severity. Change in PCL-5 total score will be examined from baseline to after 6 sessions, from baseline to after 12 sessions, from baseline to 3-month follow-up, from after 6 sessions to after 12 sessions, and from after 12 sessions to 3-month follow-up.
Change in anxiety symptomsBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionGeneralized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) Anxiety symptoms will be assessed using the GAD-7. Total scores range from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating greater anxiety symptom severity. Change in GAD-7 total score will be examined from baseline to after 6 sessions, from baseline to after 12 sessions, from baseline to 3-month follow-up, from after 6 sessions to after 12 sessions, and from after 12 sessions to 3-month follow-up.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in depressive symptomsBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionPatient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) Depressive symptoms will be assessed using the PHQ-9. Total scores range from 0 to 27, with higher scores indicating greater depressive symptom severity. Change in PHQ-9 total score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in perceived stressBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionPerceived Stress Scale (PSS) Perceived stress will be assessed using the PSS. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress. Change in PSS total score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in resilienceBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionConnor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC) esilience will be assessed using the CD-RISC. Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating greater resilience. Change in CD-RISC total score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in somatic symptomsBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionPatient Health Questionnaire-15 (PHQ-15) Somatic symptoms will be assessed using the PHQ-15. Total scores range from 0 to 30, with higher scores indicating greater somatic symptom severity. Change in PHQ-15 total score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in trauma-related use of imagination and copingBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionFRAME Trauma-related use of imagination and coping will be assessed using the FRAME questionnaire. The FRAME is a 21-item measure of fantastic reality ability, defined as the capacity to use imagination in response to stress or trauma. Items are rated on a 1-7 Likert scale, and mean scores range from 1 to 7, with higher scores indicating greater fantastic reality ability. Change in FRAME score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in sleep qualityBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionBrief Version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Sleep quality will be assessed using the brief version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index. Change in sleep quality score will be examined across the four study assessment points.
Change in PTSD-related functional impairmentBaseline, 6 weeks after baseline, 12 weeks after baseline, and 3 months after completion of the interventionPTSD-related functional impairment will be assessed using the functional impairment section of the Posttraumatic Diagnostic Scale (PDS). This section includes 7 items assessing the extent to which PTSD-related problems interfered with work, relationships, leisure activities, family relationships, sex life, general life satisfaction, and overall functioning during the past two weeks. Items are rated from 0 to 4, and total scores range from 0 to 28, with higher scores indicating greater functional impairment. Change in functional impairment score will be examined across the four study assessment points.

Countries

Israel

Contacts

CONTACTMeital Mashash, PhD
meitalm@icspc.org972-50-2888052
CONTACTSivan Raz, PhD
sivanra@telhai.ac.il972-54-6634301
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMeital Mashash, PhD

Community Stress Prevention Center

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORSivan Raz, PhD

Tel Hai College

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 18, 2026