Skip to content

Study of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 With Lenacapavir Compared to Biktarvy in People New to HIV-1 Treatment

An Operationally Seamless Phase 2/3 Randomized, Open-label, Active-Controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of an Injectable Regimen of GS-3242 in Combination With Lenacapavir Versus Biktarvy (Bictegravir/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir Alafenamide) in Treatment-Naive People With HIV-1

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07708727
Enrollment
700
Registered
2026-07-16
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2033-04-01
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV-1-infection

Brief summary

The study will have two portions: Phase 2 and Phase 3. Phase 2 will further have 2 parts: Part A and Part B. The goal of Phase 2, Part A is to assess the effectiveness of study drugs GS-3242 plus Lenacapavir (LEN) versus Biktarvy (bictegravir/emtricitabine/tenofovir alafenamide (B/F/TAF)), in people with HIV-1 (PWH) who are new to treatment. This will be done in Treatment Groups 1, 2 and 3 at Week 35. The goal of Phase 2, Part B is to compare the effectiveness of study drugs, GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF in Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. The goal of Phase 3 is to assess the long-term effectiveness of study drug GS-3242 and LEN versus B/F/TAF, at Week 52. The primary objectives of this study are: Phase 2, Part A: To evaluate the efficacy of intramuscular (IM) GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive people with HIV-1 (PWH) in Treatment Groups 1, 2, and 3 at Week 35. Phase 2, Part B: To evaluate the efficacy of IM GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive PWH in Treatment Groups 4 and 3 at Week 26. Phase 3: To evaluate the efficacy of IM GS-3242 plus IM LEN versus B/F/TAF in treatment-naive PWH at Week 52.

Interventions

Administered orally

Administered intramuscularly (IM)

Administered orally

Administered IM

DRUGB/F/TAF

Administered orally

Sponsors

Gilead Sciences
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Key Inclusion Criteria: * HIV-1 ribonucleic acid (RNA) ≥ 500 copies/mL at screening. * Antiretroviral (ARV) treatment-naive, except for prior use of oral daily pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) or postexposure prophylaxis (PEP) up to 1 month prior to screening. Key

Exclusion criteria

* Prior usage of, or exposure to LEN or GS-3242 * Prior use of any long-acting parenteral ARV therapy (ART) medications such as monoclonal antibodies or broadly neutralizing antibodies targeting HIV-1, injectable cabotegravir (including oral cabotegravir lead-in), or injectable rilpivirine. Note: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Phase 2: Part A: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 35 as Determined by the United States (US) Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 35
Phase 2: Part B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 26 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 26
Phase 3: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 52 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 52

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Phase 2: Parts A and B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 12 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 12
Phase 2: Parts A and B: Proportion of Participants With HIV-1 RNA < 50 Copies/mL at Week 52 as Determined by the US FDA Snapshot AlgorithmWeek 52
Phase 2: Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in Clusters of Differentiation 4 (CD4) Cell Count at Week 12Baseline, Week 12
Phase 2: Part A: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 35Baseline, Week 35
Phase 2: Parts A and B: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Phase 2: Part B: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 26Baseline, Week 26
Phase 2: Parts A and B: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) Through Week 12From first dose date up to Week 12
Phase 2: Part A: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 35Week 35
Phase 2: Part B: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 26From first dose date up to Week 26
Phase 2: Parts A and B and Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 52From first dose date up to Week 52
Phase 2: Part A: Groups 1 and 2: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 18Week 18
Phase 2: Part A: Groups 1 and 2: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 35Week 35
Phase 2: Part A and Part B: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 52Week 52
Phase 2: Part B: Trough Concentrations of GS-3242 and LEN at Week 26Week 26
Phase 3: Proportion of Participants with HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL at Week 104 as determined by the US FDA snapshot algorithmWeek 104
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 52Baseline, Week 52
Phase 3: Change From Baseline in CD4 Cell Count at Week 104Baseline, Week 104
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 52From first dose up to Week 52
Phase 3: Percentage of Participants Experiencing Treatment-Emergent AEs Through Week 104From first dose up to Week 104

Contacts

CONTACTGilead Clinical Study Information Center
leadClinicalTrials@gilead.com1-833-445-3230 (GILEAD-0)
STUDY_DIRECTORGilead Study Director

Gilead Sciences

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026