Skip to content

Effects of Cervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization Combined With Pilates on Bruxism

The Effects of Cervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization Followed by Pilates-Based Training on Bruxism Severity, Perceived Stress, Pain Catastrophizing, Functional Capacity, and Proprioception in Individuals With Bruxism

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07708259
Enrollment
38
Registered
2026-07-16
Start date
2026-05-04
Completion date
2026-06-29
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bruxism

Keywords

manual therapy, Bruxism, Cervical Mobilization, Sacroiliac Joint, Pilates, Proprioception

Brief summary

This study investigated the effects of adding cervical and sacroiliac mobilization to a Pilates-based exercise program on pain, perceived stress, pain catastrophizing, kinesiophobia, jaw functional limitation, cervical range of motion, cervical joint position error, and sacroiliac joint screening findings in individuals with bruxism. Thirty-eight participants were randomly allocated to a Pilates-only group (n=19) or a Manual Therapy + Pilates group (n=19). Both groups completed an 8-week, twice-weekly Pilates protocol (16 sessions); the Manual Therapy + Pilates group additionally received cervical and sacroiliac mobilization.

Detailed description

Bruxism is a repetitive jaw-muscle activity associated with musculoskeletal and psychosocial dysfunction, including cervical spine impairment and altered proprioception. This randomized study examined whether adding cervical and sacroiliac mobilization to a standardized Pilates-based exercise program produces greater improvements than Pilates alone. Outcomes included pain intensity (VAS), perceived stress (PSS-10), pain catastrophizing (PCS), kinesiophobia (TSK-17), jaw functional limitation (JFLS-8), cervical range of motion (goniometry), cervical joint position error, and sacroiliac joint screening (Standing Forward Flexion Test, Gillet Test), assessed before and after the 8-week intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALPilates-Based Exercise Program

A structured Pilates-based exercise program targeting core stability, posture, and cervical control, performed twice weekly for 8 weeks (16 sessions total, 30-40 minutes per session).

PROCEDURECervical and Sacroiliac Mobilization

Manual mobilization techniques applied to the cervical spine and sacroiliac joint, performed in addition to the Pilates-based exercise program.

Sponsors

Elif Tuğçe Çil
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Being between 18 and 65 years of age * Being diagnosed with bruxism (awake bruxism and/or sleep bruxism) based on clinical presentation and self-reported symptoms * Reporting symptoms such as jaw clenching, teeth grinding, masticatory muscle fatigue, or orofacial discomfort * Voluntarily agreeing to participate in the study and providing written informed consent * Having sufficient cognitive ability to understand and follow instructions * Being physically capable of participating in a structured exercise program * Not receiving any ongoing physiotherapy or rehabilitation program targeting the craniofacial, cervical, or lumbopelvic regions during the study period

Exclusion criteria

* History of surgical intervention involving the temporomandibular joint, cervical spine, or craniofacial region Presence of neurological, rheumatological, or systemic diseases that could affect movement, pain perception, or neuromuscular control Diagnosis of severe temporomandibular joint disorders that significantly limit jaw function or require specialized medical treatment Presence of acute musculoskeletal injury affecting the cervical spine, lumbar region, or lower extremities Current use of medications affecting neuromuscular function, such as muscle relaxants, sedatives, or psychotropic drugs Diagnosed psychiatric conditions that could interfere with participation or compliance with the study protocol Participation in any physiotherapy, rehabilitation, or structured exercise program targeting the craniofacial, cervical, or lumbopelvic regions during the study period Pregnancy, due to potential alterations in musculoskeletal and hormonal status Inability to attend regular sessions or complete the intervention protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain Intensity (VAS)Baseline and after 8-week interventionPain intensity assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (0-10 cm), with higher scores indicating greater pain.
Perceived Stress (PSS-10)Baseline and after 8-week interventionPerceived stress assessed using the Perceived Stress Scale-10 (PSS-10), with higher scores indicating greater perceived stress.
Pain Catastrophizing (PCS)Baseline and after 8-week interventionPain catastrophizing assessed using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), with higher scores indicating greater catastrophizing.
Cervical Joint Position ErrorBaseline and after 8-week interventionCervical proprioception assessed via joint position error (flexion, extension, right/left rotation), with smaller error indicating better proprioceptive accuracy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cervical Range of MotionBaseline and after 8-week interventionCervical range of motion (flexion, extension, right/left lateral flexion, right/left rotation) assessed with goniometry.
Kinesiophobia (TSK-17)Baseline and after 8-week interventionFear of movement/kinesiophobia assessed using the Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia-17 (TSK-17), with higher scores indicating greater kinesiophobia.
Sacroiliac Joint ScreeningBaseline and after 8-week interventionSacroiliac joint status assessed using the Standing Forward Flexion Test and the Gillet Test, categorized as negative or positive (with side/structure indicated when positive).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026