Skip to content

Wearable-Triggered Digital Safety Net for Real-Time Monitoring & Intervention in Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Wearable-Triggered Digital Safety Net for Real-Time Monitoring and Intervention in Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07704034
Enrollment
48
Registered
2026-07-15
Start date
2026-11-01
Completion date
2027-11-15
Last updated
2026-09-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Leptomeningeal Metastasis

Keywords

Brain and Nervous System

Brief summary

This research study is for participants diagnosed with leptomeningeal metastasis disease (LMM), a condition where cancer has spread to the fluid and membranes surround the brain and spinal cord. The purpose of this study is to find out whether a consumer Smartwatch can continuously monitor the participant's health and detect early signs of neurological decline and whether sending an automatic alert to the participant's doctor when a change is detected can help reduce the number of participant hospitalizations.

Detailed description

LMM is a condition where cancer has spread to the fluid and membranes surrounding the brain and spinal cord. It is a common complication of cancer and affects about 5-15% of all cancer patients. It causes rapid neurological decline and survival is usually around 6-12 months. LMM is treated with chemotherapy radiation, but this does not improve neurological function or quality of life. Many of the current assessments for LMM are not good detecting progression and symptoms are often missed. There will be two parts to this study. Smartwatches will be used to continuously capture data such as gait stability, heart rate variability (HRV), step count, and sleep, which are affected by LMM. The first part of this study is to learn whether this can help detect early signs of neurological decline. The second part of this study will test whether sending an automatic alert to the participant's doctor when a change is detected can help reduce the amount of times the participants are admitted to the hospital unexpectedly.

Interventions

DEVICECalibration Phase

Apple Watch Series 6+ or Samsung Galaxy Watch 4+ worn 10+ hours/day for 4+ days/week for 6 months. Passive wearable data collection from in-house cross-platform app to find out patient-specific digital signal thresholds for neurological decline, symptom logging, daily sync reminders, and monthly EORTC-QLQ-C30 surveys.

DEVICEStepped Wedge Intervention Phase

Apple Watch Series 6+ or Samsung Galaxy Watch 4+ worn 10+ hours/day for 4+ days/week for 5 months. Active monitoring with alerts using the data collected from the in-house cross-platform app and sent to study neuro-oncologist.

Sponsors

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DEVICE_FEASIBILITY
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Participants must have leptomeningeal metastasis (LMM) diagnosed per clinical, imaging, and/or CSF/cytology criteria (cytology, flow cytometry, or circulating tumor DNA), arising from any solid or hematologic tumor primary. * Participants must be undergoing active anti-cancer therapy (systemic, intrathecal, and/or radiation) or active surveillance for LMM. * Age ≥18 years at the time of study enrollment. Because no safety or dosing data are available for wearable monitoring studies in children with LMM, participants under 18 years of age are excluded. * Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥50 at time of study enrollment \[See Appendix I\], to ensure feasibility of wearing the device for ≥10 hours/day. * Participants must have access to a compatible smartphone: * iPhone running iOS 16 or higher and willingness to wear Apple Watch ≥10 hours/day; OR * Android smartphone compatible with the study application and willingness to wear Samsung Galaxy Watch ≥10 hours/day. * Ability to provide informed consent (or a legally authorized representative \[LAR\] is available and willing to provide consent on the participant's behalf, if appropriate).

Exclusion criteria

* Anticipated life expectancy \<4 weeks at time of screening, per the treating physician. * Severe dermatologic or musculoskeletal conditions precluding smartwatch wear (e.g., significant skin conditions on the wrist or forearm where the device will be placed, including tattoos that may substantially interfere with optical sensor function). * Inability to adhere to study procedures after training, as assessed by the study team at enrollment. * No access to a compatible smartphone (participant or caregiver) to interface with the watch application for symptom documentation and data transfer. * Inability to give informed consent due to severe aphasia, severe cognitive impairment, or other language barrier, unless a legally authorized representative is available and willing to participate.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Days in hospital per participant-month during silent monitoring periods5 monthsTaken from EMR by staff blinded to alert status. Defined as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using mixed-effects negative binomial regression.
Days in hospital per participant-month during active alerting periods5 monthsTaken from EMR by staff blinded to alert status. Defined as incidence rate ratios (IRRs) with 95% CIs using mixed-effects negative binomial regression.
Participant completion5 months80% or more of participants completing 3 months or more of active monitoring with median wear of 10 or more hours on 4 or more days/week
Recruitment rate12 monthsnumber of participants enrolled within 9-12 months
Dropout rate12 monthsNumber of participants who do not complete study, assessed at study completion
Alert pathway feasibility5 monthsAlert frequency per participant-month and proportion judged clinically relevant.
Predicting Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS) decline6 monthsKarnofsky Performance scale of 100-0. Sensitivity, specificity, Positive Predictive Value (PPV), and lead time of participant-specific thresholds. Assessed from calibration phase data if there is a greater than10-point KPS decline.
Predicting neurological progression6 monthsSensitivity, specificity, PPV, and lead time of participant-specific thresholds. Assessed from calibration phase data.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Progression-free survival (PFS)12 monthsTime from enrollment to first radiographic or clinical progression; assessed throughout treatment period
Overall survival (OS)12 monthsTime from enrollment to death; assessed throughout treatment period and via medical record review
Wearable data quantity across iOS and Android platforms12 monthsAssessed at each treatment visit per participant per month (mean, variance)
Time from alert trigger to clinician-documented neurological progression5 monthsEvaluate the efficacy of alert pathway in reducing unplanned hospitalization and ED visits. EMR review throughout Phase 2 during active vs. silent periods.
Wearable data quality across iOS and Android platforms12 monthsAssessed at each treatment visit per participant per month (mean, variance)
Participant symptoms12 monthsLogged per type per participant per month. Assessed at each treatment visit
Variance in accelerometry12 monthsThis device is used to track changes in physical activity and sleep patterns. Assessed at study completion
Variance in heart rate variability (HRV)12 monthsThis device assess HRV, which is where the amount of time between heartbeats fluctuate slightly. The participant's heart data will be collected and used to see if there any changes from the participant's month 1 mean. Assessed at study completion
Variance in gait metrics12 monthsThis device assesses the speed, step length and asymmetry to see if changes these can predict any clinical events by days to weeks.
Reasons for dropout12 monthsCollected via exit questionnaire at withdrawal or study completion
Participant device wear12 monthsCollected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL)
Participant symptom logging12 monthsCollected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL).
Participant app usage12 monthsCollected via exit survey and structured questionnaires at each visit for participant reported quality of life (QOL).
Number of unplanned hospitalizations and ED visits per participant-month5 monthsEvaluate the efficacy of alert pathway in reducing unplanned hospitalization and ED visits. EMR review throughout Phase 2 during active vs. silent periods.
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 ( EORTC-QLQ-C30) total and subscale scores6 monthsEORTC-QLQ-C30 is a 30 item validated questionnaire to determine the participant's quality of life. The questions are in a 4- point scale from 1 ("Not at all)" to 4 ("Very much"). A higher functional or global health score represents a higher quality of life, while a higher symptom score means a higher level of reported symptoms. Change in EORTC-QLQ-C30 will be measured from baseline at each time point.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTAndrew Dhawan, MD, DPhil
dhawana@ccf.org216-444-5322
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAndrew Dhawan, MD, DPhil

Cleveland Clinic, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 4, 2026