Skip to content

COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 Polymorphisms and Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block Success

The Relationship Between COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 Polymorphisms and the Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07697300
Enrollment
95
Registered
2026-07-13
Start date
2025-11-12
Completion date
2026-04-28
Last updated
2026-07-14

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Symptomatic Irreversible Pulpitis (SIP)

Brief summary

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the association between COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 genetic polymorphisms and the success of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Patients presenting with moderate to severe pain were enrolled. Before anesthesia, pain intensity was assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS), and pulpal vitality was evaluated using cold and electric pulp tests. All participants received a standardized inferior alveolar nerve block with 4% articaine containing epinephrine. Fifteen minutes after injection, pulpal anesthesia was reassessed using cold and electric pulp tests. Patients who continued to respond to these tests were considered to have unsuccessful pulpal anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Patients with no response to either test were included in the study, and root canal treatment was initiated. Pain experienced during the procedure was assessed using the HP-VAS. Buccal swab samples were collected for genomic DNA isolation, and COMT, MAOA, and SLC6A4 polymorphisms were analyzed using a Real-Time PCR-based TaqMan genotyping assay. The association between genetic polymorphisms and the success of inferior alveolar nerve block was statistically evaluated.

Interventions

A standardized inferior alveolar nerve block was administered using 4% articaine with epinephrine to patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in mandibular molars. Fifteen minutes after injection, pulpal anesthesia was evaluated using cold and electric pulp tests. Participants who continued to respond to either test were considered to have unsuccessful pulpal anesthesia and were excluded from the study. Root canal treatment was initiated in participants who showed no response to both tests. Pain experienced during treatment was assessed using the Heft-Parker Visual Analog Scale (HP-VAS). Anesthetic success was defined as an HP-VAS score of less than 54 mm, whereas an HP-VAS score of 54 mm or greater was considered anesthetic failure.

Sponsors

Marmara University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

All participants received the same standardized inferior alveolar nerve block using 4% articaine with epinephrine before endodontic treatment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

Age between 15 and 60 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I. Clinical diagnosis of symptomatic irreversible pulpitis in a mandibular molar requiring primary root canal treatment. Positive response to both the cold test and electric pulp test before treatment. Presence of pulpal bleeding upon access cavity preparation, confirming pulp vitality. Periodontal probing depth ≤3 mm. Sufficient coronal tooth structure to allow rubber dam isolation. No use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within 12 hours before enrollment. No known allergy or hypersensitivity to articaine or epinephrine. No history of systemic or genetic disease. Ability and willingness to provide written informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

Previous endodontic treatment of the study tooth. Extensive coronal destruction preventing rubber dam isolation. Internal or external root resorption. Periodontal probing depth \>3 mm. Pregnancy or breastfeeding. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to articaine or epinephrine. Use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) within 12 hours before enrollment. Presence of any systemic or genetic disease. Inability or unwillingness to provide written informed consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Success of Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block AnesthesiaDuring root canal treatment.Anesthetic success was defined as an HP-VAS score of less than 54 mm during access cavity preparation and root canal treatment in patients with symptomatic irreversible pulpitis. An HP-VAS score of 54 mm or greater was considered anesthetic failure.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORNevin kartal, Prof.Dr

Marmara University Faculty of Dentistry

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 15, 2026