Skip to content

Sleep, Chronotype, and Prosocial Allocation Decisions

Associations Between Sleep Quality, Circadian Timing, and Prosocial Allocation Decisions in Adults

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07697092
Acronym
SCPAD
Enrollment
128
Registered
2026-07-13
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2028-06-30
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronotype, Circadian Timing, Prosocial Decision-Making, Sleep Quality

Keywords

Sleep Quality, Chronotype, Circadian Timing, Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, Sleep Diary, Dictator Game, Prosocial Behavior, Prosocial Decision-Making, Allocation Decisions

Brief summary

This observational behavioural study examines whether individual differences in sleep quality, sleep timing, and chronotype are associated with prosocial allocation decisions in adults. Participants will complete self-report sleep and circadian questionnaires, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, a 7-day sleep diary, and a brief computer-based Dictator Game allocation task. The study does not involve sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, treatment, clinical diagnosis, medication, or medical devices. Participants will not be asked to change their sleep schedule. The Dictator Game decisions are hypothetical and do not affect participants' compensation. The study is intended to describe associations between naturally occurring sleep-related individual differences and behavioural allocation choices, not to diagnose or treat sleep or mental health conditions.

Detailed description

This is a non-clinical observational behavioural study of adults aged 18 years or above. The study investigates whether naturally occurring differences in subjective sleep quality, sleep timing, and circadian preference are associated with prosocial decision-making in a computer-based allocation task. Participants will first provide informed consent and will be assigned a participant code so that research data can be pseudonymised. They will complete demographic questions and sleep-related self-report measures. These measures include the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, which assesses subjective sleep quality over the previous month, and the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, which assesses sleep timing on workdays and free days and provides chronotype-related variables. Participants will also complete a 7-day sleep diary recording daily sleep-related information such as bedtime, estimated sleep onset, wake time, rise time, naps, subjective sleep quality, and schedule-related information. Prosocial allocation behaviour will be assessed using a brief computer-based Dictator Game task. In this task, participants make hypothetical allocation choices involving distributions of money between themselves and another party. No deception cover story will be used. Participants will not be falsely told that they are interacting with a real paired participant if no real allocation exists. Dictator Game choices are hypothetical and do not affect actual compensation. The primary aim is to examine associations between sleep quality, sleep timing, chronotype-related measures, and prosocial allocation behaviour. Secondary analyses may explore whether 7-day sleep diary measures provide additional information beyond retrospective questionnaire measures. Exploratory analyses may examine whether chronotype, sleep timing, or time of day moderates associations between sleep-related measures and Dictator Game behaviour. These analyses will be interpreted cautiously and will not be used to make clinical claims. The study is not designed to diagnose, treat, or induce any sleep disorder, mental health condition, or other clinical condition. The PSQI, MCTQ, and sleep diary are used as non-diagnostic research measures. No clinical diagnosis, treatment recommendation, or personalised sleep advice will be provided. The expected risks are minimal and may include mild boredom or tiredness, mild discomfort when reflecting on sleep habits or making self-other allocation decisions, minor inconvenience from completing the 7-day diary, and privacy concerns about sleep schedule information. Risk will be minimised through informed consent, voluntary participation, the right to withdraw, non-clinical wording, pseudonymisation, separate storage of identifiable records, and restricted access to research data.

Interventions

OTHERSleep, Circadian, and Prosocial Allocation Assessment

Participants complete non-diagnostic sleep and circadian self-report measures, including the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index, the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire, and a 7-day sleep diary, followed by a brief computer-based Dictator Game allocation task. This is an observational assessment procedure only. Participants are not assigned to a treatment, sleep manipulation, sleep deprivation, sleep restriction, or behaviour-change intervention.

Sponsors

The Hong Kong Polytechnic University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Aged 18 years or above. * Able to provide informed consent. * Able to understand English or Chinese study materials. * Able to complete computer-based behavioural tasks and self-report questionnaires. * Willing to complete a 7-day sleep diary.

Exclusion criteria

* Aged under 18 years. * Unable to provide informed consent. * Unable to complete study materials in English or Chinese. * Prior participation in the same study. * Self-reported condition or circumstance that would make participation in a brief computer-based decision-making task or sleep-related questionnaires inappropriate or distressing.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Dictator Game Prosocial Allocation ScoreDay 1 (single study session)Prosocial allocation behaviour will be measured using a brief computer-based Dictator Game task. The primary behavioural score will be the number or proportion of trials in which the participant selects the more prosocial allocation option across the task, with higher scores indicating more prosocial allocation choices.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index Global ScoreDay 1 (single study session)Subjective sleep quality over the previous month will be assessed using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The PSQI global score is calculated according to standard scoring procedures and ranges from 0 to 21, with higher scores indicating poorer subjective sleep quality. The PSQI is used as a non-diagnostic research measure.
Chronotype (Sleep-Corrected Mid-Sleep on Free Days, MSFsc) From the Munich Chronotype QuestionnaireDay 1 (single study session)Circadian preference (chronotype) will be assessed using the Munich Chronotype Questionnaire (MCTQ). The chronotype variable reported is the sleep-corrected mid-sleep time on free days (MSFsc), expressed as clock time in decimal hours, with later values indicating a later (more evening) chronotype. The MCTQ is used as a non-diagnostic research measure.
Mean Sleep Duration From the 7-Day Sleep DiaryDaily for the 7 days before the study session (Days -7 to -1)Nightly sleep duration will be recorded in a 7-day sleep diary and averaged across the diary days to yield mean sleep duration, reported in hours per night.

Countries

Hong Kong

Contacts

CONTACTCehao Yu, PhD
cehao.yu@polyu.edu.hk+852 3400 3012
CONTACTJunkai Che, Master
junkai.che@connect.polyu.hk+852 9783 8643

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026