Skip to content

Predictors of Epidural Depth in Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Model Development

Analysis of Factors Influencing Epidural Depth in Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy and Development of a Predictive Model

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07697053
Enrollment
3278
Registered
2026-07-10
Start date
2026-06-30
Completion date
2026-08-31
Last updated
2026-07-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Epidural Anesthesia, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Keywords

epidural anesthesia, epidural depth, predictive model, body mass index, Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL)

Brief summary

Accurate estimation of epidural depth is critical for safe epidural anesthesia during percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). Although various imaging modalities can predict epidural depth, they increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority. However, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. This retrospective study aims to identify independent factors influencing epidural depth in PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Detailed description

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) is the standard minimally invasive surgical procedure for removal of kidney stones larger than 2 cm and is established as the gold standard for the management of complex renal calculi. This procedure may be performed under either general anesthesia or regional anesthesia, including epidural or spinal anesthesia. Accumulating meta-analyses have demonstrated that, compared with general anesthesia, regional anesthesia is associated with reduced postoperative pain scores and lower total hospital costs, without compromising the stone-free rate. Furthermore, in awake patients undergoing regional anesthesia, respiratory movements may generate a so-called "respiratory-synchronous stone fragmentation effect," which facilitates the expulsion of stone debris. Successful epidural anesthesia relies critically on accurate identification of the epidural space and precise control of puncture depth. Insufficient puncture depth may result in improper catheter placement and subsequent block failure, whereas excessive puncture depth increases the risk of dural puncture, leading to cerebrospinal fluid leakage and post-dural puncture headache. In severe cases, inadvertent injection of a large dose of local anesthetics into the subarachnoid space can cause life-threatening cardiovascular and respiratory depression. Therefore, preprocedural estimation of the skin-to-epidural space distance is of considerable clinical importance. Although racial differences in epidural depth have been reported, systematic investigations specifically targeting the Chinese population remain scarce. Various imaging modalities, including computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, and ultrasound, can be used to predict epidural depth. However, these examinations increase healthcare burden and are not always feasible in emergency or bedside settings. Consequently, identifying simple, easily obtainable clinical parameters-such as sex, age, and body mass index (BMI)-for predicting epidural depth has become a research priority. In this context, the present study aimed to identify factors influencing epidural depth through a retrospective analysis of clinical data from PCNL patients and to develop simple, level-specific predictive models for different puncture sites, thereby providing a practical reference for clinical epidural anesthesia.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Tongji Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
OTHER
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years * Successful epidural puncture and catheter placement using the midline approach * Clear documentation of puncture level and puncture depth in the anesthesia record

Exclusion criteria

* Dural puncture during anesthesia (including those who subsequently had a successful repuncture) * Use of the paramedian approach for epidural puncture * Uncertain epidural anesthesia effect requiring combined general anesthesia * Incomplete clinical data

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Epidural depthPerioperative/PeriproceduralEpidural depth, defined as the vertical distance from the skin surface to the epidural space measured at the time of puncture using the loss-of-resistance technique via the midline approach. Depth was recorded from the needle shaft markings to the nearest 0.1 cm.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Adjusted R²through study completion, an average of 1 monthThe coefficient of determination adjusted for the number of predictors in the model, reflecting the proportion of variance in epidural depth explained by the predictive model at each puncture level. Higher values indicate better model fit.
Root mean square error (RMSE)through study completion, an average of 1 monthThe square root of the average squared difference between the model-predicted epidural depth and the actual measured depth, expressed in cm. Lower values indicate better predictive accuracy of the model at each puncture level.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTHongbo Zheng, MM
zheng1283@163.com+8618040544926
CONTACTHong Chen Chen, MM
2010tj0573@hust.edu.cn17786127071
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHongbo Zheng, MM

Tongji Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 17, 2026