Skip to content

Evaluation of Choose to Move Replacement Ready (CTM-RR)

Choose to Move Replacement Ready: Implementation and Effectiveness of a Virtual Health-Promoting Intervention for People Awaiting Total Hip or Knee Replacement Surgery

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07696650
Acronym
CTM-RR
Enrollment
210
Registered
2026-07-10
Start date
2026-09-01
Completion date
2028-08-01
Last updated
2026-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Implementation Science, Mobility Limitation, Older Adults, Osteoarthritis (OA), Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Hip, Osteoarthritis (OA) of the Knee, Pain, Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviors, Social Isolation or Loneliness, Total Hip Arthroplasty (THA), Total Knee Anthroplasty

Keywords

Osteoarthritis, Implementation science, Physical activity, Social isolation, Older adults, Mobility, Joint replacement, Loneliness, Pain

Brief summary

Choose to Move (CTM) is a 3-month, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults being scaled-up across British Columbia (BC), Canada. Recently, the investigators adapted CTM for the \>14000 people in BC who are on surgical waitlists for total knee replacement or total hip replacement (TKR/THR) for osteoarthritis (OA). The primary goals of this observational study are to describe how the adapted program, Choose to Move Replacement Ready (CTM-RR), is implemented in BC and determine if the adapted program improves health outcomes in people with hip and/or knee osteoarthritis who are on surgical waitlists for TKR/THR. The investigators will also evaluate whether any health benefits achieved by CTM-RR participants are maintained three months after they finish the program and also during the remaining time that they wait for their TKR/THR surgery. The investigators will work with referral partners from hospitals and orthopaedic clinics in BC to recruit participants into CTM-RR. Participants who enrol in CTM-RR will answer online survey questions about the program and about their physical activity, mobility, pain, function, quality of life, willingness to undergo surgery, overall perception of their joint condition, psychosocial health, self-efficacy, social isolation, loneliness, and sedentary time. CTM-RR activity coaches will also answer online survey questions about the program. CTM-RR participants, activity coaches, and referral partners will also participate in interviews about the program.

Detailed description

Choose to Move (CTM) an effective 3-month, choice-based health-promoting program for low active older adults being scaled-up in phases across British Columbia (BC), Canada. Choose to Move Replacement Ready (CTM-RR) is an adapted version of the program tailored to support individuals with hip and/ or knee osteoarthritis on surgical waitlists for TKR/THR, with the overall goal of enhancing key health outcomes. Referral partners from hospitals and orthopaedic clinics in BC will inform patients about CTM-RR when they are booked for a hip or knee replacement surgery. Trained activity coaches hired by the Active Aging Society will deliver the online CTM-RR program to individuals on surgical waitlists for TKR/THR who register for the program. The investigators will then evaluate implementation of CTM-RR, impact of CTM-RR on participants' physical and social health, and maintenance of any health benefits. The primary aim of this trial is to assess implementation and effectiveness of the adapted CTM-RR program. The specific objectives are to: 1. assess implementation of CTM-RR. Specifically, implementation determinants (context, acceptability, feasibility, appropriateness, self-efficacy) and implementation outcomes (1° implementation outcome: fidelity; 2° implementation outcomes: reach, retention, adoption, dose, adaptation, satisfaction). 2. evaluate effectiveness of CTM-RR. Specifically, whether CTM-RR increases participants' pre-operative moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (moderate to vigorous physical activity, 1° effectiveness outcome), mobility, psychosocial health, self-efficacy to manage their condition; improves their pain, function, quality of life, and perception of their joint condition, and decreases social isolation and loneliness (2° effectiveness outcomes). 3. evaluate if participant health benefits (if any) are maintained 3 months after CTM-RR is completed. 4. evaluate if participant health benefits (if any) are maintained up until participant's surgery (i.e. during the remaining surgical waiting period). In partnership with the Active Aging Society, the investigators aim to deliver 20 CTM-RR online programs over two years to approximately 300 participants across BC. There is no cost to participate in the CTM-RR program, and individuals may participate in CTM-RR regardless of whether they choose to be evaluated as part of this trial. The investigators expect approximately 70% of CTM-RR participants to volunteer for the evaluation. The investigators will conduct a pre-post, observational cohort trial using a hybrid implementation effectiveness type 2 trial design. Data will be collected at 0 (baseline), 3 (postintervention), and 6 (long-term follow-up) months and 2-weeks before surgery (pre-operative) to assess implementation and impact of CTM-RR, and maintenance of any program-related benefits.

Interventions

As described under study arm description.

Sponsors

University of British Columbia
Lead SponsorOTHER
Active Aging Society
CollaboratorOTHER
Specialist Services Committee (Doctors of BC)
CollaboratorUNKNOWN

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Activity coach hired by the Active Aging Society (activity coaches must speak English to participate in the evaluation); 2. English-speaking older adults (aged \>=50 years) who participate in CTM-RR will be invited to participate in the evaluation; 3. Referral partner (People who work in a healthcare setting who refer patients into the program)

Exclusion criteria

1. non-English speaking activity coach 2. non-English speaking referral partner

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Effectiveness outcome: Change in physical activitybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeSingle-item physical activity questionnaire. Output measure is self-reported number of days engaging in ≥30 minutes of moderate-to-vigorous physical activity in the past week (range 0-7). Higher scores reflect a better outcome (i.e. increased physical activity)
Implementation outcome: Fidelity (Proportion of participants who adhered to CTM-RR program components)3 monthsObtained from post-program survey. Measures adherence to prescribed frequency, intensity, duration, and type of exercises performed, and attendance at CTM-RR group meetings.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in patient global assessment of target jointbaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeSingle-item measure using a numerical rating scale: score (0-10) assesses the overall condition of the affected hip or knee joint. Higher scores indicate worse condition (severe symptoms).
Change in arthritis-specific self-efficacybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 8-item questionnaire assesses how certain an individual is that they can manage various aspects of their arthritis. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-10. The output variable is the average score of all 8-items (range 8-80); higher scores indicate more self-efficacy.
Change in pain intensitybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativePain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS): score (0-10) assesses pain intensity on average during the past week. Higher scores indicate worse pain intensity.
Change in willingness to undergo surgerybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeOne item will assess participants' willingness to undergo hip or knee replacement surgery. The question asks: "What is your current willingness to undergo a \[total hip replacement surgery or total knee replacement surgery\]?" The response options are: definitely unwilling, probably unwilling, unsure, probably willing or definitely willing. Definitely unwilling, probably unwilling, unsure= No, and probably willing or definitely willing=Yes. The output variable is self-reported willingness to undergo surgery (yes/no).
Change in anxietybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe Generalized Anxiety Disorder 7-item scale (GAD-7) will be used to assess the presence of anxiety. Each item is scored on a scale of 0-3. The output variable is the summed total of all scores (range 0-21); higher scores indicate greater levels of anxiety.
Change in kinesiophobiabaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 11-item Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia (TSK-11) assesses fear of movement in individuals with chronic pain. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-4. The output variable is the total summed score of all 11-items (range 11-44); higher scores indicate greater fear of movement.
Reach3 monthsNumber of individuals participating in CTM-RR programs will be obtained from program records
RetentionBaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeObtained from evaluation records. Proportion of participants who consent to the evaluation who complete each assessment.
Dose delivered3 monthsObtained from post-program survey. Proportion of required intervention components (group meetings and one-on-one consultations) delivered by activity coaches.
Adoption3 monthsObtained from program records. Number of referral partners who refer participants to the program.
Adaptation (survey)3 monthsPlanned or purposeful changes to the delivery of CTM-RR by activity coaches will be assessed by survey (short answer responses; developed in house). Coaches will indicate if they made any adaptations to the program (yes/no) and to provide details of any adaptations such as why it needed to occur.
Satisfaction with CTM-RR (survey)3 monthsSatisfaction with CTM-RR will be assessed via participant (older adults) survey (designed in house). Higher scores (1-5 Likert scale) indicate higher participant satisfaction with the intervention.
Change in walking timebaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF): assesses self-reported weekly minutes of walking
Change in sedentary timebaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeInternational Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ-SF): assesses self-reported weekly minutes of sedentary time
Change in bone and muscle strengthening activitybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeSingle-item muscle strengthening activity survey. Number of days in past week doing activities that increase bone and muscle strength
Change in balance activitybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeSingle-item activity survey. Number of days in past week doing activities that improve balance.
Change in capacity for mobilitybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeShort-Form-36 health survey (SF-36) Physical Functioning Scale: two items assess self-reported ability to walk ¼ mile and 1 flight of stairs.
Change in social isolationbaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeSocial Isolation Questionnaire: score (0-15) reflects the degree of social interaction and support. Higher scores indicate a greater level of social interaction and support.
Change in lonelinessbaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 3-item U.S. Health and Retirement Study Participant Lifestyle Questionnaire reflects experiences of loneliness. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-3. The output variable is the summed score of the 3 items (range 3-9); Higher scores indicate greater perceived loneliness.
Change in ability to participate in daily activitiesbaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe four-item PROMIS- Ability to Participate in Social Roles and Activities Scale- short form 4a will be used to assess perceived ability to perform one's usual social roles and activities. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-5. The output variable is the summed raw score of all 4-items (range 4-20) converted into a T-score (27.5-64.2) ; higher scores indicate greater ability to engage in social roles and activities.
Change in exercise self-efficacybaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 10-item Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale (ESES) assesses how confident participants are with regard to carrying out regular physical activities and exercise. Each item is scored on a scale of 1-4. The output variable is the total summed score of all 10 items (range 10-40); higher scores indicate greater self-efficacy for exercise.
Change in Hip disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome 12-item Scorebaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 12-item Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS-12) assesses patients' hip condition (pain, function, quality of life). Each item is scored on a scale of 0-10. The output variable is the average score of the 12-items (range 0-100); higher scores indicate worse hip problems.
Change in Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome 12-item Scorebaseline, 3 and 6 months, 2 weeks pre-operativeThe 12-item Knee Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS-12) assesses patients' knee condition (pain, function, quality of life). Each item is scored on a scale of 0-10. The output variable is the average score of the 12- items (range 0-100); higher scores indicate worse knee problems.

Countries

Canada

Contacts

CONTACTDouglas L Race, MSc
douglas.race@ubc.ca604-875-4111
CONTACTGiulia Coletta, PhD
giulia.coletta@ubc.ca604-875-4111
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORHeather A McKay, PhD

University of British Columbia

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORLaura Churchill, PT, PhD

University of British Columbia

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJoanie Sims Gould, MSW, PhD

University of British Columbia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Aug 25, 2026