Skip to content

Jaw Tracking Impact on Occlusion and Patient Outcomes in Maxillary Implant Restorations

Jaw Tracking Impact on Occlusion and Patient Outcomes in Maxillary Implant Restorations: Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07693946
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-07-09
Start date
2025-12-25
Completion date
2027-01-25
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Complete Maxillary Edentulism, Edentulism

Keywords

Digital jaw tracking, Maxillary implant-supported prosthesis, Screw-retained prosthesis, Occlusal accuracy, Patient satisfaction, OccluSense, Randomized clinical trial

Brief summary

This randomized clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of integrating digital jaw tracking into the workflow for fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported screw-retained restorations. Twenty completely edentulous maxillary patients opposing natural mandibular dentition will be randomly assigned to either a conventional workflow group or a digital jaw-tracking workflow group. The study will compare patient satisfaction and occlusal accuracy between the two groups. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS), while occlusal accuracy will be evaluated using the OccluSense system.

Detailed description

This randomized clinical trial will compare conventional prosthetic workflow with a digital jaw-tracking workflow for the fabrication of full-arch maxillary implant-supported screw-retained restorations. Twenty edentulous patients with completely edentulous maxillary arches opposing natural mandibular dentition will be recruited and randomly allocated into two equal groups. Group A will receive restorations fabricated using the conventional workflow with static jaw relation records, while Group B will receive restorations fabricated using a digital workflow incorporating dynamic jaw tracking and a virtual articulator. The primary outcome will be patient satisfaction, assessed using a visual analogue scale (VAS) after prosthesis insertion and during follow-up visits. Occlusal accuracy will be evaluated using the OccluSense digital occlusal analysis system. The study aims to determine whether digital jaw tracking improves occlusal accuracy and patient-reported outcomes compared with the conventional workflow.

Interventions

PROCEDUREConventional Prosthetic Workflow

Fabrication of a full-arch maxillary implant-supported screw-retained prosthesis using conventional jaw relation records, a facebow or average-value articulator, and conventional occlusal adjustment procedures.

PROCEDUREDigital Jaw-Tracking Workflow

Fabrication of a full-arch maxillary implant-supported screw-retained prosthesis using a digital workflow with dynamic jaw tracking, virtual articulator integration, and CAD/CAM technology for patient-specific occlusal design.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two parallel groups: a conventional workflow group or a digital jaw-tracking workflow group.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female patients aged 50 to 70 years. * Completely edentulous maxillary arch opposing natural mandibular dentition. * Skeletal Class I maxillomandibular relationship with normal occlusion. * Acceptable oral hygiene. * Willing and able to provide written informed consent and comply with study procedures.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic diseases affecting bone healing, such as uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or osteoporosis. * Harmful oral habits, including smoking, clenching, or bruxism. * Uncooperative patients or patients unable to comply with study procedures.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Patient SatisfactionAt prosthesis insertion, 3 months, and 6 months after prosthesis insertionPatient satisfaction will be assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) to evaluate patient satisfaction with the implant-supported prosthesis regarding comfort, chewing ability, aesthetics, and phonetics.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Occlusal AccuracyAt prosthesis insertion and 3 months after insertionOcclusal accuracy will be evaluated using the OccluSense digital occlusal analysis system by assessing the distribution and stability of occlusal contact points.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTShahira s Mohamed, BDS
shahirasaad@mans.edu.eg+20 1004455178
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShahira S Mohamed, BDS

Faculty of Dentistry, Mansoura University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026