Skip to content

Digital vs. Conventional Indirect Bonding.

Comparison of Indirect Bonding of Orthodontic Brackets Using Digital Versus Conventional Technology: A Randomized Controlled Trial on Bonding Time and Bracket Failure

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07692880
Enrollment
20
Registered
2026-07-09
Start date
2025-09-03
Completion date
2026-08-24
Last updated
2026-07-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Malocclusion

Brief summary

This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques for fixed orthodontic bracket placement in adolescent patients requiring treatment in both dental arches. Each participant will receive both bonding techniques, with allocation of the digital and conventional indirect bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization. The study will evaluate the time required to complete bracket bonding procedures and the early clinical performance of the two techniques, assessed by bracket failure within the first month after appliance placement.

Detailed description

Indirect bonding has been proposed as an alternative to direct bonding for the placement of orthodontic brackets, with potential advantages in terms of clinical efficiency, bracket positioning, and patient comfort. In recent years, computer-aided three-dimensional design and manufacturing methods have enabled the production of digital transfer trays for indirect bonding, offering a potentially more standardized workflow compared with conventional laboratory-based procedures. This randomized split-mouth clinical trial will compare digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques in patients undergoing fixed orthodontic treatment in both the upper and lower arches. Each participant will receive both techniques, with the allocation of the digital and conventional bonding procedures to the upper or lower arch determined by randomization. In the digital indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a digital workflow and brackets will be bonded using a pre-coated adhesive system. In the conventional indirect bonding procedure, transfer trays will be produced using a standard laboratory workflow and brackets will be bonded using a conventional orthodontic adhesive system. The study will assess the procedural efficiency of the two techniques by recording the time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure. Early clinical performance will be evaluated by recording bracket failures during the first month of orthodontic treatment. All procedures and follow-up assessments will be performed in a clinical orthodontic setting.

Interventions

DEVICEdigital indirect bonding technique

Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a digital indirect bonding technique

DEVICEconventional indirect bonding technique

Fixed orthodontic appliance will be bonded using a conventional indirect bonding technique

Sponsors

Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Randomized split-mouth design. Each participant will receive both digital and conventional indirect bonding techniques. Participants will be randomized to one of two allocation sequences: digital indirect bonding in the upper arch and conventional indirect bonding in the lower arch, or conventional indirect bonding in the upper arch and digital indirect bonding in the lower arch.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
12 Years to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients aged 12 to 18 years requiring fixed orthodontic treatment on both upper and lower arches * Presence of full permanent dentition, including erupted second molars

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of dental anomalies in number (supernumerary or missing teeth) in either arch * Orthodontic treatment plans involving tooth extractions in either arch * Nickel allergy * History of cleft lip and/or palate * Craniofacial syndromes

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time required to complete bracket bonding procedures, measured in minutesDuring procedure (from the beginning of bracket bonding to completion of bracket placement)The time required to complete the bracket bonding procedure will be measured in minutes for each participant, from the beginning of the bonding procedure to completion of bracket placement, using the assigned adhesive system.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Bracket failure rate within the first month of orthodontic treatment assessed by clinical examination1 month after placement of the fixed orthodontic applianceBracket failure will be assessed by clinical examination and recorded as the number of brackets detached from the tooth surface within the first month after placement of the fixed orthodontic appliance.

Countries

Italy

Contacts

CONTACTLorenzo Franchi
lorenzo.franchi@unifi.it+390557945602

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 10, 2026