Heart Failure
Conditions
Keywords
Heart Failure, Smartwatch, Explainable artificial intelligence
Brief summary
The goal of this observational study is to develop and validate an XAI based model that predicts HF events and identifies modifiable con-tributing factors, and to evaluate the added value of integrating high frequency smartwatch data compared to usual care in patients with heart failure. The main objectives of the study are: 1. To develop and validate an XAI based model that predicts HF events and identifies modifiable contributing factors, and to evaluate the added value of integrating high frequency smartwatch data compared to usual care. In the Netherlands usual care includes remote monitoring of heartrate, blood pressure, weight and symptoms. 2. To include insights of the smartwatch into activity patterns, impact on quality of life (KCCQ-12), and patient satisfaction with net promoter score (NPS). Participants will wear a smartwatch for six months and perform an I-lead ecg with the smartwatch weekly.
Interventions
None listed
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Adult HF patients * NYHA class II, or NYHA III * Recent rehospitalization for HF * Usual care with active participation in the telemonitoring program "Zorg Bij Jou" (ZBJ) * Possession of an iPhone 11 or newer and compatible with the study apps
Exclusion criteria
* Lack of digital literacy or inability to use the device * Not capable to sign consent * Referral to hospice
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Heart failure (HF) event | From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 6 months | HF event is defined as: * Increase in diuretic treatment * Increase in NYHA class * Hospitalization caused by HF * Death caused by HF |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Activity patterns | From enrollment to the end of follow-up at 6 months | Activity patterns measured with the smartwatch |
| Quality of life (QoL) | Measured at baseline and at the end of follow-up at 6 months. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is scored on a scale of 0 to 100; higher scores indicate better health. | QoL measured with Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-12 |
| Net promotor score | At the end of follow-up at 6 months | Net promotor score measures how likely patients are to recommend this technology to others. This score ranges from 0 to 10. Higher values indicate a greater likelihood of recommending to others. |
Countries
Netherlands