Wear, Occlusal
Conditions
Brief summary
This randomized clinical trial aims to to evaluate and compare the 24-month surface wear of the restoration and the surface wear of the opposing natural tooth structure of CAD/CAM Hybrid Ceramic (SHOFU Hard blocks) versus Resin-based Composite (BRILLIANT Crios) overlays, utilizing a digital subtraction methodology (Intraoral Scanner and Geometrical Subtraction Software) in endodontically treated molar teeth.
Detailed description
The rationale for this 24-month RCT is driven by the need for high-level, evidence-based data to guide clinical material selection for compromised teeth. This trial is designed to directly compare two materials specifically engineered to be stress-absorbing in the oral environment. The primary intervention, the SHOFU Restorative System (Hard blocks), is a Hybrid Ceramic engineered to combine the durability of ceramics with the elasticity of polymers. Its reduced hardness and dentin-like modulus allow for rapid machining and are associated with reduced antagonist abrasion compared to conventional ceramics. The second material, serving as the comparator, is the Coltène Restorative System (BRILLIANT Crios), which is a reinforced nano-hybrid composite characterized by an elastic modulus comparable to dentin, designed for optimal shock absorption and confirmed to be gentle on antagonist teeth. Focusing the study on endodontically treated molars addresses a highly prevalent clinical scenario where maximizing the longevity of the restoration and the remaining tooth structure is paramount. The use of a full-cusp-coverage overlay design represents the maximum conservation approach for these compromised teeth while ensuring that the selected restorative materials do not exert harmful effects on opposing dentition.
Interventions
CAD/CAM Hybrid Ceramic, Overlay restored using the SHOFU cementation system.
Resin-based Composite, Overlay restored using the Coltène cementation system.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age between 22 and 45 years. * Low to moderate caries risk. * Normal occlusion. * Absence of signs or symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorders. * Satisfactory oral hygiene. * Medically fit to receive routine restorative dental treatment. * Permanent molars. * Asymptomatic endodontically treated teeth. * Homogeneous root canal fillings extending 1-2 mm from the radiographic apex. * Compound cavities. * Favorable occlusion. * Presence of both an adjacent tooth and a sound opposing tooth in occlusion
Exclusion criteria
* \* Presence of bruxism. * Poor patient cooperation. * Inability or unwillingness to attend follow-up appointments. * Anticipated travel during the study period. * Poor oral hygiene. * Chronic or advanced periodontitis. * Known allergies to any of the materials used in the study. * Patients who are pregnant or breastfeeding. * Teeth with \<1" mm" of residual wall thickness. * Deep subgingival cavity margins. * Severe periodontal problems. * Radiographic signs of apical pathology.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Annual wear rate | 24 months | Digital Scanner +Geometrical Subtraction Software |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Functional properties, Biological properties and Esthetic properties | 24 months | FDI Criteria |