Skip to content

Measuring Knee Laxity and Pivot Shift in ACL-Deficient Patients

Objective Quantification of Knee Laxity Using a Robotic Knee Testing System and Correlation With Clinical Pivot Shift Grade in ACL-Deficient Patients

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07688967
Enrollment
25
Registered
2026-07-07
Start date
2026-07-07
Completion date
2027-07-01
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) Tear

Keywords

anterior cruciate ligament, pivot shift, knee instability, robotic knee testing

Brief summary

The goal of this observational study is to learn whether the Robotic Knee Testing system can measure knee looseness in adults with an anterior cruciate ligament, or ACL, tear. The main question it aims to answer is whether measurements from the Robotic Knee Testing system are related to the doctor's pivot shift exam grade. Participants will complete one study visit before ACL reconstruction. During the visit, both knees will be tested in the Robotic Knee Testing system. Researchers may also review existing medical information and imaging.

Detailed description

This study includes two parts. In Phase 1, researchers will adjust the Robotic Knee Testing system settings to identify testing conditions that are safe, tolerable, and able to reproduce knee motion similar to the pivot shift exam. During Phase 1, the device will test how knee motion changes when the leg is placed in different positions. Researchers will evaluate whether tibial internal rotation and knee flexion angle change varus-valgus knee motion. They will also evaluate whether varus-valgus knee position and knee flexion angle change internal-external tibial rotation. These tests are intended to help identify device settings that may reproduce the coupled motion seen during a clinical pivot shift exam. The robotic torque-motion curves will also be reviewed for abrupt changes, discontinuities, or "jumps." These findings may represent the knee moving from a stable position into an unstable position. In Phase 2, participants will be tested using the finalized device settings from Phase 1. The device will apply controlled anterior-posterior, internal-external rotation, and varus-valgus movements while measuring knee motion in six degrees of freedom. Researchers will compare the robotic measurements with the pivot shift grade documented by the treating orthopedic surgeon. When available, existing MRI or X-ray images may also be reviewed to evaluate whether knee bone structure is related to robotic laxity measurements or pivot shift severity. No additional imaging will be performed for this study.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Arthroresearch LLC
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
CROSS_SECTIONAL

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adults aged 18-65 years * Confirmed ACL tear by MRI or arthroscopic diagnosis * Able to provide informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Prior major surgery on the affected knee * Multi-ligament knee injury * Active infection or inflammatory arthropathy * Inability to tolerate passive motion testing * Pregnant or planning to become pregnant during the study period * Unable to provide informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinician-graded pivot shiftBefore ACL reconstruction, during the preoperative clinical exam and/or examination under anesthesia.Clinician-graded pivot shift from 0 to 3, obtained from the treating orthopedic surgeon's preoperative clinical exam and/or examination under anesthesia before ACL reconstruction.
Association Between RKT Knee Motion Measurements and Clinician-Graded Pivot Shift GradeRKT testing at the preoperative study visit and pivot shift grading before ACL reconstructionRelationship between Robotic Knee Testing measurements of tibiofemoral motion and clinician-graded pivot shift grade from 0 to 3. RKT measurements may include tibial translation and rotation during robotic testing.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
RKT Torque-Motion Hysteresis Curve FeaturesDuring RKT testing at the preoperative study visit before ACL reconstructionTorque-displacement and torque-rotation curves from robotic testing will be evaluated for features such as slope changes, curve area, discontinuities, or "jumps" that may reflect knee instability.
Effect of Knee Position on RKT Motion MeasurementsDuring RKT testing at the preoperative study visit before ACL reconstructionRKT measurements will be compared across different testing conditions, including tibial internal rotation angle, varus-valgus knee position, knee flexion angle, and preset torque thresholds, to identify settings associated with pivot-shift-like motion.
Association Between Bone Morphology and Knee Instability MeasurementsExisting imaging reviewed after enrollment and before data analysisExisting MRI or X-ray images may be reviewed to assess bone morphology, including posterior tibial slope and femoral-tibial plateau geometry, and compare these measures with RKT measurements and pivot shift grade.

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSamantha J Beckley, PhD
s.beckley@arthroresearch.com470-955-7069
CONTACTShaun K Stinton, PhD
s.stinton@arthroresearch.com
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORShaun K Stinton, PhD

Arthroresearch LLC

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026