Skip to content

Advanced Robotic Techniques and Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Next-Generation Sequencing.

Advanced Robotic Techniques and Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Next-Generation Sequencing: the ARTEMIS Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07685977
Acronym
ARTEMIS
Enrollment
400
Registered
2026-07-06
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2029-04-01
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Pulmonary Lesions (PPLs)

Keywords

Peripheral pulmonary lesion, Robotic assisted bronchoscopy, Rapid onsite evaluation

Brief summary

ARTEMIS is a multicenter randomized controlled trial. The goal is to understand whether rapid onsite evaluation during robotic assisted bronchoscopy improves the diagnostic performance of the procedure or not.

Detailed description

Pulmonary nodules are an incredibly common finding, with millions incidentally detected in the US every year. Biopsy is often needed for diagnosis. Robotic assisted bronchoscopy (RAB) with integrated cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) has achieved diagnostic yields exceeding 80% in some studies, significantly higher than traditional methods without advanced imaging, due to the added ability to correct alignment of the bronchoscopy catheter with the target lesion in real-time. Given this, the added value of rapid on-site cytologic evaluation (ROSE) with modern bronchoscopy is an area of debate. ROSE involves immediate intraprocedural microscopic assessment of biopsy specimens (typically by a cytotechnologist) to confirm adequacy of biopsy samples for malignant diagnosis during the bronchoscopy. This study will aim to test the hypothesis that modern bronchoscopy done without ROSE guidance is non-inferior to bronchoscopy with ROSE available. Patients undergoing RAB to biopsy a lung lesion will be approached for enrollment and assigned to either ROSE vs no ROSE if they agree to participate. Randomization will be revealed before procedures are started. All decisions regarding procedure tools, techniques, and patient management will be per usual care and at the discretion of the treating physician.

Interventions

OTHERRapid onsite evaluation

ROSE involves immediate intraprocedural microscopic assessment of biopsy specimens (typically by a cytotechnologist) to confirm adequacy of biopsy samples for malignant diagnosis during the bronchoscopy

Sponsors

Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Lead SponsorOTHER
AstraZeneca
CollaboratorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

It is not possible to blind the bronchoscopist given the nature of the intervention. However, patients and thoracic pathologists (outcome adjudicators) will remain blinded.

Intervention model description

This study is a pragmatic randomized controlled trial with parallel group assignment.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* ≥ 18 years of age at time of bronchoscopy * Undergoing robotic assisted bronchoscopy to biopsy a pulmonary lesion

Exclusion criteria

* Declines to participate or inability to provide informed consent. * Clinician determination that the use of ROSE is required or contraindicated for the optimal care of an individual patient * Patient enrolled in another trial that requires ROSE for PPL biopsy * Patient previously consented for this trial * Pregnant or incarcerated patients

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Strict diagnostic yield, defined as the proportion of procedures that result in acquisition of lesional tissue.7 days post procedureLesional tissue is defined by the presence of specific pathological findings that readily explain the presence of a pulmonary lesion. The following common pathological findings are pre-specified: 1. Malignancy 2. Specific benign pathologic findings including: organizing pneumonia, frank purulence/robust neutrophilic inflammation with a pathogen isolated, granulomatous inflammation, hamartoma, amyloidoma or other uncommon causes of peripheral pulmonary lesions with distinctive pathological patterns.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sufficiency of malignant specimens for Next-Generation Sequencing30 days post procedureProportion of malignant biopsies with sufficient material to send for NGS

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTSanja Antic Research coordinator
sanja.l.antic@vumc.org(615) 322-5000
CONTACTRafael Paez Co-PI, MD
rafael.paez@vumc.org(615) 322-5000
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORFabien Maldonado, MD

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026