Skip to content

Does Traditional Archery Training Enhance Psychological Abilities?

Does Traditional Archery Training Enhance Psychological Abilities?

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07684729
Acronym
TAT and PA
Enrollment
2
Registered
2026-07-06
Start date
2025-01-15
Completion date
2025-06-10
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy Volunteers, Problem Solving, Psychological Skills, Sport Imagery

Keywords

Traditional Archery, Sport Imagery, Problem Solving, Mental Training, Psychological Skills, Healthy Adults, Motor Learning

Brief summary

This study aims to investigate the effects of a 12-week traditional archery training program on sport imagery ability and problem-solving skills in healthy university students. Participants without previous archery experience were randomly allocated into either a traditional archery training group or a non-exercising control group. Psychological outcomes were evaluated before and after the intervention using validated questionnaires.

Detailed description

The study was designed as a quasi-experimental pretest-posttest controlled trial. Healthy university students aged 18-23 years without previous archery experience were recruited through convenience sampling. Participants were randomly assigned to either: Traditional Archery Training group Control group The intervention lasted 12 weeks. Training was performed: 2 sessions/week 2 hours/session Total training time: 48 hours The first six weeks focused primarily on basic draw practice. The last six weeks included basic draw shooting practice archery games Primary outcomes included: Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) Measurements were obtained before and after the intervention.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALTraditional Archery Training (TAT)

Participants completed a structured 12-week traditional archery training program consisting of basic draw exercises, thumb draw practice, shooting practice, and archery games under supervision.

Sponsors

Gümüşhane Universıty
Lead SponsorOTHER
Nevsehir Haci Bektas Veli University
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants completed a structured 12-week traditional archery training program consisting of basic draw exercises, thumb draw practice, shooting practice, and archery games under supervision.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Healthy university students * Age between 18 and 25 years * Male or female * No previous archery experience * No participation in regular physical activity during the intervention * Written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Previous archery experience * Participation in any structured exercise during the intervention * Any medical condition preventing participation * Withdrawal from the study * Receiving physical therapy during the intervention

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Sport Imagery AbilityWeek 12Sport Imagery Ability Questionnaire (SIAQ) consists of 15 items on a 7-point Likert scale and is evaluated by the average of the sub-dimensions (Skill, Strategy, Goal, Emotion, Mastery) or the overall average (between 1 and 7). A score range of 5.01-7.00 indicates high imagery ability, while a score range of 1.00-3.00 indicates low ability.
Problem Solving AbilityWeek 12The Problem Solving Inventory (PSI) measures individuals' problem-solving skills and attitudes using a 32-item self-report scale; a total score between 32 and 192 indicates high skill, while a high score indicates low skill (less effective strategy). The assessment is based on high ability (32-80), moderate ability (81-140), and low ability (141-192) ranges.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Skill Imagery (SIAQ)12 WeekThe Skill Imagery (SIAQ) subscale is scored on a 7-point Likert scale, averaging the scores of 3 items (3, 8, 12) to obtain a score between 1.00 and 7.00, with higher scores indicating better visualization ability. This measure classifies skill level according to score ranges of 5.01-7.00 (High), 3.01-5.00 (Medium), and 1.00-3.00 (Low).

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

STUDY_DIRECTORCoşkun YILMAZ, Associate professor

Gümüşhane Universıty

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026