Skip to content

Artificial Intelligence Chatbots as an Educational Tool for Statistical Analysis Among Dental Students

Usability and Efficacy of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots as an Educational Aid for Statistical Data Analysis Among Dental Students: A Randomized Crossover Trial

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07684651
Enrollment
220
Registered
2026-07-06
Start date
2026-04-04
Completion date
2026-07-30
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Dental Education and Teaching Learning Processes

Brief summary

The goal of this randomized crossover trial is to learn if ChatGPT-5.2 is usable and effective as a supplementary educational tool for teaching statistical data analysis to fifth-year undergraduate dental students. The study will also compare ChatGPT-5.2 with conventional statistical tools, such as Microsoft Excel and online statistical calculators.

Interventions

OTHERChatGPT 5.2

ChatGPT 5.2 will be used for solving the statistical analysis assignment

Microsoft excel and online calculators will be used to solve the statistical analysis assignment

Sponsors

Rowan Elshabrawy
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 25 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Fifth-year undergraduate dental students enrolled at the Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. 2. Students officially registered in the Research Project course (211082502) during the Spring 2026 semester. 3. Provided written informed consent and agreed to participate voluntarily in the study.

Exclusion criteria

1. Postgraduate students and undergraduate students not enrolled in the fifth year of the dental program, Faculty of Dentistry, Alexandria University, Egypt. 2. Students not registered in the Research Project course during the Spring 2026 semester. 3. Students who decline to provide written informed consent to participate in the study \-

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
The efficacy of technological tools for completing the statistical analysis assignments.21 daysEfficacy will be evaluated by comparing participants' performance scores across the two tools (AI-ChatGPT-5.2 and conventional tools). Scores will be calculated as the percentage of correct answers in the two assignments. Score = (Number of correct answers)/(total number of questions)×100
The usability of the technological tools for completing the statistical analysis assignments21 daysUsability is defined as "the extent to which a product can be used by specified users to achieve specific goals with effectiveness, efficiency, and satisfaction in a specified context of use. it will be assessed using system usability questionnaire(SUS), SUS yields a single number representing a composite measure of the overall usability of the system being studied. Note that scores for individual items are not meaningful on their own. To calculate the SUS score, first sum the score contributions from each item. Each item's score contribution will range from 0 to 4. For items 1,3,5,7,and 9 the score contribution is the scale position minus 1. For items 2,4,6,8 and 10, the contribution is 5 minus the scale position. Multiply the sum of the scores by 2.5 to obtain the overall value of SU. SUS scores have a range of 0 to 100.

Countries

Egypt

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026