Skip to content

Effect of Implementing External Ventricular Drain Guidelines on Nurses' Practice and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients' Outcomes

Effect of Implementing External Ventricular Drain Guidelines on Nurses' Practice and Traumatic Brain Injury Patients' Outcomes

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07682987
Enrollment
86
Registered
2026-07-06
Start date
2025-09-07
Completion date
2027-01-01
Last updated
2026-07-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Brain Injuries,Traumatic

Keywords

External Ventricular Drain Guidelines, Nurses' Practice, Traumatic Brain Injury Patients' Outcomes

Brief summary

Neurosurgical patients are more vulnerable to infections related to medical care due to their requirement for surgically inserted devices like ventriculostomies and their extended hospital stays. Introduction of a foreign device can result in infection due to insertion technique as well as postinsertion management. Establishing protocols of ventriculostomy drain management tools to raise nurse awareness and adherence to the most recent standards of care may greatly lower the risk of health care-associated infection in the neurosurgical population. Based on the high demand on information and technological resources, nurses must be qualified to ensure patient safety and make more assertive decisions. For this reason, it is imperative that these nurses possess the necessary knowledge and abilities to provide assistance. The purpose of training has evolved to encompass professional development, acquiring knowledge, and the teaching and practicing of new skills

Detailed description

Traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains a global public health challenge. It is a major cause of death and disability across all ages worldwide (World Health Organisation, 2018; American Association for Surgery of Trauma, 2018), with substantial socio-economic consequences (Kolias, Rubiano, Figaji, Servadei & Hutchinson, 2019). The rising global incidence of TBI is attributable to the increase in road traffic collisions and trauma-related violence in low and middle-income countries. It causes death in more than five million people annually, representing approximately 10% of the global death toll (WHO, 2014). Major trauma is a main cause of admissions to intensive care units (ICU) and consumes a significant share of ICU resources (Menon, & Ercole, 2017). Traumatic brain injury can be divided into primary and secondary brain injury. The primary injury occurs because of the initial physical insult. The pattern and extent of damage will depend on the nature, intensity, and duration of the impact (Carlson et al., 2024). Following a primary injury, brain oedema, disturbed cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) dynamics, and the presence of mass lesions exhaust the volume buffering compensatory mechanism mediated by CSF drainage from brain cisterns to the spinal subarachnoid space and can lead to a rise in intracranial pressure (ICP) (Chau et al., 2019). The subsequent increase in ICP and impaired autoregulation result in reduced cerebral perfusion, exacerbating cerebral ischemia, secondary brain injury, brain tissue compression, distortion, and herniation can ultimately lead to death (Alali et al., 2013). Therefore, control of ICP is an important factor in the medical and surgical management of TBI (Winkler, Minter, Yue, & Manley, 2016). External ventricular drainage is a lifesaving procedure experienced in neurocritical care units (Muralidharan, 2015). It is consisting of placing a catheter into the lateral ventricles of the brain to a collection system outside of the body with the purpose of diverting the CSF flow extra-cranially or to monitor ICP (Patil et al., 2013). After insertion, the EVD monitoring, maintenance and troubleshooting essentially become a nursing responsibility. Accurate and accountable nursing care may have the ability to portend better outcomes in patients requiring CSF drainage ( Mohamed Maarouf, & Faltas Marzouk Faltas, 2020) . The external ventricular drain (EVD) is a medical and health technology that serves both diagnostic and therapeutic purposes (Jamjoom et al., 2018). It is widely recognized as the preferred method and is considered the gold standard for treating certain neurological conditions such as hydrocephalus, intracranial hemorrhage, tumors, meningitis. By facilitating continuous monitoring and effectively reducing ICP. Although the EVD enables drug delivery, blood or CSF drainage, and CSF collection samples when required (Carney et al., 2017). The utilization of EVD catheters combined with ICP monitoring has seen a notable rise. This monitoring technique enables the recording of ICP values and waveform patterns while maintaining continuous CSF drainage (Chau et al., 2019). External ventricular drain is contraindicated in patients who have a coagulation disorder, receive anticoagulant medication, or have a disease on their scalp or localized abscesses. This precaution is due to the significant risk of central nervous system infections, such as meningitis and ventriculitis (Sweet & Foley, 2019). The EVD system must be correctly levelled and closed to CSF drainage for an appropriate amount of time to provide a precise ICP reading, which is required to assess the brain's health (Liu et al, 2020). Adjusting the height of the collection chamber regulates the flow by increasing or decreasing the amount of pressure required for the CSF to drain . The CSF drainage is dependent on the balance between ICP and the height of the reservoir. Ventricular drainage can be used to assist with controlling increased ICP by providing a temporary exit for the CSF flow (Camacho et al, 2013). Patients undergoing EVD may encounter various complications that can impact their wellbeing. These include the possibility of infection, which can be recognized by symptoms such as elevated body temperature, redness, or the discharge of fluid or secretion. System obstruction may be observed when the drainage of CSF falls below the expected minimum level or when the CSF waveform appears flat on the monitoring device. Another potential complication is excessive CSF drainage. Furthermore, EVD can result in bleeding, problems with the ventricles, or unintentional catheter removal, requiring neurosurgical interference (Aslam, Afzal, Sarwar, & Khan, 2022). Nurses who are competent in the assessment and care of patients with both neurological and drain conditions should keep a close eye on patients who need an EVD. Monitoring for symptoms and signs connected to changing ICP should be part of the patient assessment process. The registered nurse should conduct and record neurological examinations on an hourly basis. This includes measuring the mean ICP, CSF drainage, color, and clarity (Kumar, Malhotra, & Bhatia, 2021).

Interventions

OTHERExternal Ventricular Drain Guidelines

mandatory checks, hourly documentation, leveling the EVD system, dressing changes, removal of the EVD, CSF sampling, ICP monitoring and documentation.

Sponsors

Mansoura University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult traumatic brain injury patients ≥ 18 years old of each gender. * Hemodynamically stable patients. * Patients who are free from an EVD related complications within 24hours

Exclusion criteria

* Bleeding from the site of EVD within 24hours. * Hypo and hyper drainage of CSF or CSF leakage from entry site within 24hours. * Signs of infection related to EVD such as (fever- headache- change in CSF characteristics). * Coagulation disorder and who receive anticoagulant drug.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
cerebrospinal fluid4 monthsAbsence of CSF leakage from the site of insertion.

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAli

Mansoura University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 7, 2026