Skip to content

Efficacy of Facial Massager in Reducing Intra Oral Injection Pain in Pediatric Patients

Efficacy of a Vibrating Facial-T- Massager as an Adjunct to Topical Anesthesia in Reducing Intraoral Injection Pain in Children: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07682181
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-07-02
Start date
2026-06-01
Completion date
2026-12-31
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Local Anesthesia Infiltration

Keywords

local anesthesia, local infiltration, massager, vibrating device, Topical Benzocaine

Brief summary

Abstract * Background: Local anesthesia is a primary source of anxiety in pediatric dentistry. * Objective: To evaluate if mechanical vibration from a low-cost facial massager reduces pain and anxiety during injections using the Gate Control Theory. * Design: Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial .

Detailed description

Methodology & Study Design * Setting: Pediatric Dental Department, Kadapa, Andhra Pradesh. * Inclusion Criteria: Children aged 4-12 years requiring local anesthesia, cooperative (frankl 3,4) * Exclusion Criteria: History of allergy to benzocaine, acute infection at the site, or special healthcare needs affecting sensory perception, Medically compromised, unco-operative children, those who do not consent. Intervention Protocol 1. Group 1: Application of 20% Benzocaine gel for 2 minutes followed by a standard local anesthetic injection. 2. Group 2: Application of Facial Massager on the buccal mucosa 30 seconds prior to and during the injection. 3. Group 3: Application of 20% Benzocaine gel for 2 minutes + Facial Massager applied to the buccal mucosa 30 seconds prior to and during the injection. 4. Infection Control & Sterilization To ensure patient safety, the following protocol for the non-medical T-massager will be implemented: * Barrier Protection: The device will be encased in a single-use, disposable polyethylene sleeve (Digital Sensor Sleeve) and secured with tape. * Disinfection: After barrier removal, a "Double-Wipe" method using 70% Isopropyl Alcohol wipe will be used.

Interventions

DEVICEFacial T massager

vibrating facial T massager used to apply on mucosa for mechanical stimulation and gate control

topical application of mucopain gel for 30 seconds

Sponsors

Government Dental College and Hospital, India
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
4 Years to 12 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Children aged 4-12 years requiring local anesthesia * Cooperative behaviour (frankl rating 3,4)

Exclusion criteria

* History of allergy to benzocaine * acute infection at the site * special healthcare needs affecting sensory perception * Medically compromised children * unco-operative children * those who do not consent.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
self reort of painafter injectionwong-baker faces pain rating scale with face emoji rating no pain as score zero to score ten as that huts worst.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
physiologic parameterpre and during administration of local anesthesiameasuring heart rate pre and during injection of local Anesthesia

Contacts

CONTACTjayachandra Assistant professor, MDS
dr.jayachandra2509@gmail.com+91-9490088514

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026