Skip to content

Success of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion During Continuous Chest Compressions in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study

Success of Laryngeal Mask Airway (LMA) Insertion During Continuous Chest Compressions in Neonatal Resuscitation: A Randomized Crossover Simulation Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07681960
Enrollment
32
Registered
2026-07-02
Start date
2026-06-23
Completion date
2026-06-24
Last updated
2026-07-02

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Asphyxia Neonatorum, Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR), Neonatal Resuscitation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the time required for laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion, first-attempt success rates, and airway sealing quality (air leak) during neonatal resuscitation with and without interrupting chest compressions. Standard resuscitation guidelines recommend pausing chest compressions for airway interventions due to the difficulty of inserting devices during physical movement. However, interrupting compressions drops coronary and cerebral perfusion. This study tests whether an LMA can be successfully inserted without pausing compressions in a high-fidelity simulation model. A total of 32 anesthesiologists participate in this randomized, crossover simulation study using a high-fidelity neonatal manikin. Participants perform two different scenarios in a randomly allocated order: Scenario A involves standard LMA insertion with interrupted chest compressions, and Scenario B involves LMA insertion during continuous, uninterrupted chest compressions. The primary objective is to determine if performing the procedure under continuous chest compressions affects the procedure time, clinical success, air leak volumes, or the perceived workload and stress of the practitioners.

Interventions

DEVICESize 1 ProSeal™ LMA

Laryngeal Mask Airway used for neonatal ventilation simulation.

Sponsors

Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. Being a senior anesthesiology resident (completed 2nd year) or an attending anesthesiologist. 2. Voluntary participation with signed informed consent.

Exclusion criteria

1. Refusal to participate. 2. Major physical disability that limits psychomotor tasks.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
LMA Insertion TimePeriproceduralThe time (in seconds) elapsed from the moment the participant picks up the LMA until the device is seated in the anatomical position and the first lung ventilation is achieved.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
First-attempt insertion success ratePeriproceduralPercentage of participants succeeding on the first try
Measured Air Leak Volume1 minute post-procedureMeasured Air Leak Volume (L/min) during 1-minute ventilation.
Perceived Procedural DifficultyImmediate post-procedureMeasured via Visual Analogue Scale - VAS, 0 to 10

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 3, 2026