Skip to content

Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Grade II and III Hemorrhoids

Comparison of Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty Versus Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy in Grade II and III Hemorrhoids: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07678814
Acronym
LHP-MMH
Enrollment
96
Registered
2026-07-01
Start date
2025-09-01
Completion date
2026-03-31
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Hemorrhoids Second Degree, Hemorrhoids Third Degree, Internal Hemorrhoids

Keywords

Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty, Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy, Randomized Controlled Trial, Postoperative Pain, Patient Satisfaction

Brief summary

Hemorrhoidal disease is one of the most common anorectal disorders. Conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy remains the standard treatment but is associated with considerable postoperative pain. Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative. This randomized controlled trial compares postoperative pain, patient satisfaction, and hospital stay between Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty and conventional hemorrhoidectomy in patients with Grade II and Grade III hemorrhoids.

Detailed description

This single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted in the Department of Surgery, Jinnah Hospital Lahore. Ninety-six patients diagnosed with Grade II or Grade III hemorrhoids were randomized into two equal groups. Group A underwent Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty. Group B underwent conventional Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy. Patients were followed postoperatively for pain assessment using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), hospital stay, and patient satisfaction using a structured Likert-scale questionnaire.

Interventions

Patients randomized to the intervention group underwent Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty under spinal anesthesia. A diode laser probe was introduced into the hemorrhoidal tissue through a small mucosal entry point under direct visualization using an anoscope. Controlled laser energy was delivered submucosally to achieve coagulation, shrinkage, and fixation of the hemorrhoidal cushions while preserving the surrounding anoderm and mucosa. The procedure was performed according to standard surgical protocols with the aim of reducing postoperative pain, bleeding, and recovery time.

Patients randomized to the control group underwent conventional open Milligan Morgan Hemorrhoidectomy under spinal anesthesia. The hemorrhoidal pedicles were identified, ligated, and excised using standard surgical techniques. The wounds were left open with preservation of mucocutaneous bridges between excision sites. Hemostasis was achieved as required. Patients received routine postoperative care and follow-up according to institutional protocols.

Sponsors

Allama Iqbal Medical College
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥18 years Grade II hemorrhoids Grade III hemorrhoids Both genders

Exclusion criteria

Rectal prolapse Anal fissure Anorectal malignancy Pregnancy or lactating mothers

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative PainPost Operative period: (6) Six Hourly in first 48 Hours, at 1 week post operative period & at 1 month post operatively.Pain measured using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS).
Patient Satisfaction1 month postoperativePatient satisfaction assessed using Likert-scale questionnaire.

Countries

Pakistan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026