Skip to content

High-Fidelity Simulation in Vaccination Training

The Effect of High-fidelity Simulation on Childhood Vaccination Training in Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07678190
Enrollment
104
Registered
2026-07-01
Start date
2022-11-01
Completion date
2023-01-01
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Education Nursing, Simulation-based Education, Vaccination Training

Keywords

vaccine hesitancy, high-fidelity simulation, nursing students, ımmunization, knowledge, skill

Brief summary

This study compared the impact of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standart laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, learning satisfaction, and self-confidence within a childhood vaccination training.

Detailed description

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effectiveness of high-fidelity simulation (HFS) versus standard laboratory practice (SLP) on nursing students' knowledge, psychomotor skills, satisfaction, and self-confidence in childhood vaccination training. A total of 122 fourth-year nursing students were randomly assigned to HFS or SLP groups; 104 completed the study. All participants received the same theoretical training on childhood immunization. The HFS group participated in a simulation scenario involving vaccine hesitancy, while the SLP group performed traditional laboratory-based practice on a manikin. Knowledge was assessed using a pre-test, post-test at 1 hour, and a one-month follow-up test. Skills were evaluated immediately after the intervention. Satisfaction and self-confidence were also measured post-intervention. The primary outcomes were knowledge and skill performance, while secondary outcomes included satisfaction and self-confidence. The study was conducted in accordance with ethical standards, and informed consent was obtained from all participants.

Interventions

High-fidelity simulation-based training including a vaccine hesitancy scenario, structured briefing, simulation, and debriefing.

BEHAVIORALStandard Laboratory Practice

Traditional laboratory-based vaccination training using a manikin without a structured simulation scenario.

Sponsors

Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Experimental Group: High-Fidelity Simulation (HFS) Control Group: Standard Laboratory Practice (SLP)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Fourth-year nursing students * Voluntary participation

Exclusion criteria

* Did not complete post-tests * Non-volunteering

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Childhood Immunization Knowledge Test (CIKT)Baseline, 1 hour after training, and 1 month after trainingA 10-item multiple-choice test developed by the researchers based on national guidelines and literature. Each correct answer is scored as 10 points. Total scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating greater knowledge of childhood immunization. Expert validation was obtained, and the KR-20 reliability coefficient was 0.93.
Pediatric Intramuscular Vaccination Administration Checklist (PIVAC)1 hour after trainingItems are scored from 0 (not performed) to 2 (performed). Total scores range from 0 to 40, with higher scores indicating better pediatric intramuscular vaccination administration skills. The checklist demonstrated expert validity and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.90.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Student Satisfaction and Self-Confidence in Learning Scale (SCLS)1 hour after trainingA validated 12-item, 5-point Likert scale with two subscales (Satisfaction and Self-Confidence). Total scores range from 12 to 60, with higher scores indicating greater satisfaction and self-confidence in learning. In this study, Cronbach's alpha was 0.96 for the satisfaction subscale, 0.94 for the self-confidence subscale, and 0.96 for the total scale.
Simulation Design Scale (SDS)1 hour after trainingThe Simulation Design Scale consists of 20 items rated on a 5-point Likert scale. Total scores range from 20 to 100, with higher scores indicating a more positive evaluation of the simulation design. Cronbach's alpha was 0.98.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026