Skip to content

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists and Alzheimer's Disease: A Multi-National Target Trial Emulation

GLP-1 Receptor Agonists Prevent Alzheimer's Disease Onset, Not Progression: Resolving the Real-World-Randomised Trial Paradox Across Five Continents

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07677865
Acronym
GLP1-AD-TTE
Enrollment
213891
Registered
2026-07-01
Start date
2007-01-01
Completion date
2026-06-24
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alzheimer Disease, Diabetes Mellitus Type 2, Obesity & Overweight

Keywords

glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, Alzheimer disease

Brief summary

Background: Seven large real-world cohort studies (N \> 4 million) have consistently reported that glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are associated with a 19-54% lower incidence of Alzheimer's disease (AD). However, in November 2025, the phase 3 EVOKE and EVOKE+ trials of oral semaglutide in 3,808 patients with biomarker-confirmed early-stage AD failed to slow clinical progression. This paradox between real-world evidence (RWE) and randomised evidence has not been systematically examined. Moreover, prior RWE studies were conducted predominantly in North American and European populations, leaving a critical generalisability gap for East Asian populations, who face the world's largest AD burden. Objective: To resolve the RWE-RCT paradox by testing whether the GLP-1RA effect on AD differs between cognitively unimpaired adults (primary prevention paradigm) and patients with established cognitive impairment (treatment paradigm), and to assess whether the protective effect is consistent across European, African, and East Asian ancestries. Study Design: This is a multi-centre, retrospective, observational cohort study using a target trial emulation framework. The investigator analysed patient-level electronic health records (EHR) from five cohorts across four continents: Optum® Clinformatics® (USA), Mass General Brigham Biobank (USA), CPRD Aurum (UK), the Swedish National Diabetes Register (Sweden), and the Hong Kong Hospital Authority Clinical Data Analysis and Reporting System (HKHA CDARS), which covers approximately the entire Hong Kong population. Study Population: A total of 2,138,917 adults aged ≥ 40 years with type 2 diabetes or obesity, with ≥ 2 years of continuous enrolment and no prior neurodegenerative disease diagnosis. GLP-1RA initiators (n = 612,418) were compared with DPP-4 inhibitor initiators (n = 1,526,499) using propensity-score overlap weighting, Fine-Gray competing-risk adjustment, negative-control outcomes, and instrumental-variable analysis to address confounding and surveillance bias.

Interventions

like semaglutide、tirzepatide、liraglutide,etc.

Sitagliptin,Saxagliptin,Vildagliptin,Linagliptin,Alogliptin etc.

Sponsors

West China Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER
Hong Kong University
CollaboratorOTHER
Boston Children's Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER
Karolinska University Hospital
CollaboratorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
40 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* • Age ≥ 40 years * Diagnosis of type 2 diabetes (ICD-10 E11) or obesity (E66) * ≥ 2 years of continuous enrolment in the cohort * Baseline HbA1c \< 10.5% * No prior diagnosis of any neurodegenerative disease * No prior use of any GLP-1RA or DPP-4i

Exclusion criteria

* • Prior diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease or other neurodegenerative diseases * Prior use of GLP-1 receptor agonists or DPP-4 inhibitors * Age \< 40 years * Baseline HbA1c ≥ 10.5% * Less than 2 years of continuous enrolment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of Alzheimer's DiseaseUp to 10 years (from index date of medication initiation to date of first AD diagnosis, death, or end of follow-up, whichever occurs first).Measurement Tool: International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision (ICD-10) diagnostic code G30 (Alzheimer's disease), extracted from linked electronic health records (EHR) and hospitalization databases across all participating cohorts. Diagnostic validity was confirmed via chart review against biomarker-confirmed AD (amyloid PET, CSF Aβ42, or plasma p-tau217), with a positive predictive value (PPV) ranging from 68.9% to 71.3% in validation samples. Unit of Measure: Time to first incident diagnosis, expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% confidence intervals, comparing GLP-1 receptor agonist initiators versus DPP-4 inhibitor initiators. Incidence rates are also reported as number of events per 1,000 person-years. Scale Information: Not applicable (this is a time-to-event diagnostic outcome, not a rating scale).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of All-Cause Dementia.Up to 10 yearsMeasurement Tool: ICD-10 codes for any dementia diagnosis, including Alzheimer's disease (G30), vascular dementia (F01), and unspecified dementia (F03), extracted from EHR and hospitalization records. Unit of Measure: Time to first diagnosis, expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% CI. Scale Information: Not applicable (diagnostic outcome).
Rate of Progression from Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI) to Alzheimer's DiseaseUp to 10 yearsMeasurement Name: Rate of Progression from MCI to AD. Measurement Tool: ICD-10 code G31.84 (Mild cognitive impairment) at baseline, followed by subsequent ICD-10 code G30 (Alzheimer's disease) during follow-up, extracted from EHR. Unit of Measure: Time to progression, expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% CI, specifically analyzed within the EVOKE-eligible patient subgroup (those with baseline cognitive impairment). Scale Information: Not applicable (diagnostic progression outcome).
Rate of All-Cause Mortality.Up to 10 years.Measurement Tool: Death records linked from national or regional death registries (e.g., Hong Kong Death Registry, Swedish National Death Registry, UK Office for National Statistics). Unit of Measure: Time to death, expressed as Hazard Ratio (HR) with 95% CI, analyzed using Fine-Gray subdistribution hazard models to account for competing risks. Scale Information: Not applicable (mortality outcome).

Countries

China

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026