Skip to content

ACB and iPACK Blocks With Intravenous Dexamethasone and Perineural Dexmedetomidine in Total Knee Arthroplasty

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Three Adjuvant Strategies for ACB and iPACK Blocks in Patients Undergoing Elective Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07677215
Enrollment
120
Registered
2026-06-30
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-10-01
Last updated
2026-06-30

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Knee Osteoarthritis

Brief summary

This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety of three adjuvant strategies for ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) and iPACK block in patients undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine combined with ACB and iPACK blocks using 0.2% ropivacaine. Patients will be randomized into one of three groups: standard ACB + iPACK without adjuvants, ACB + iPACK with intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg, or ACB + iPACK with intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg combined with perineural dexmedetomidine added to both regional blocks. The primary outcome will be total postoperative opioid consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery expressed as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary outcomes will include pain intensity at rest and during movement, duration of analgesia, time to first rescue analgesia, quadriceps muscle strength, early mobilization, adverse events, inflammatory markers, and length of hospital stay.

Detailed description

Postoperative pain following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) remains a major clinical challenge and may negatively affect early mobilization, rehabilitation, patient satisfaction, and postoperative recovery. Inadequate pain control after TKA is associated with increased opioid consumption and opioid-related adverse events, including nausea, vomiting, sedation, urinary retention, respiratory depression, and postoperative delirium, particularly in elderly patients. Ultrasound-guided Adductor Canal Block (ACB) combined with iPACK (Infiltration between the Popliteal Artery and Capsule of the Knee) block has become an increasingly popular regional anesthesia strategy for TKA because it may provide effective analgesia while preserving quadriceps muscle strength and facilitating early mobilization. The ACB primarily targets the sensory innervation of the anterior and medial aspects of the knee, whereas the iPACK block supplements analgesia of the posterior knee capsule. Several adjuvant medications have been investigated to prolong the duration and improve the quality of peripheral nerve blocks. Intravenous dexamethasone is widely used as a perioperative analgesic adjunct and may prolong postoperative analgesia while also reducing postoperative nausea and vomiting. Perineural dexmedetomidine has been shown to prolong sensory blockade, improve analgesia quality, and reduce opioid requirements. However, the optimal combination of systemic and perineural adjuvants for ACB and iPACK blocks in TKA remains unclear. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled trial is to compare three perioperative analgesic strategies in patients undergoing elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty under spinal anesthesia: Standard ACB + iPACK without adjuvants, ACB + iPACK with intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg, ACB + iPACK with intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg combined with perineural dexmedetomidine. All participants will receive standardized spinal anesthesia with 0.5% ropivacaine (3-4 mL). Ultrasound-guided ACB and iPACK blocks will be performed using 20 mL of 0.2% ropivacaine for each block. In the dexmedetomidine group, 12.5 µg of dexmedetomidine will be added to each regional block. The primary endpoint of the study will be total postoperative opioid consumption during the first 48 postoperative hours expressed as intravenous morphine equivalents. Secondary endpoints will include postoperative pain scores at rest and during movement, time to first rescue analgesia, duration of analgesia, quadriceps muscle strength, early mobilization, opioid-related adverse events, dexmedetomidine-related adverse events such as bradycardia and hypotension, inflammatory markers, and length of hospital stay. The study hypothesis is that intravenous dexamethasone will improve postoperative analgesia compared with standard ACB + iPACK alone, while the addition of low-dose perineural dexmedetomidine will further prolong analgesia duration and reduce opioid consumption without significantly increasing adverse events or impairing postoperative mobilization.

Interventions

DRUGRopivacaine 0.2% Injectable Solution

Ropivacaine 0.2% used for ultrasound-guided ACB and iPACK blocks (20 mL per block).

DRUGDexamethasone

Intravenous dexamethasone 8 mg administered perioperatively.

DRUGDexmedetomidine

Perineural dexmedetomidine 12.5 μg added to each regional block (ACB and iPACK).

Sponsors

Poznan University of Medical Sciences
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to 100 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 60 and 100 years * Scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty * American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III * Ability to understand study procedures and provide written informed consent * Eligibility for spinal anesthesia and ultrasound-guided regional anesthesia according to institutional standards

Exclusion criteria

* Known allergy or hypersensitivity to ropivacaine, dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, or any study-related medication * Contraindications to spinal anesthesia or peripheral nerve blocks * Coagulation disorders or anticoagulant therapy preventing safe regional anesthesia * Infection at the planned puncture site or systemic infection * Severe neurological disorders affecting lower limb sensory or motor function * Severe hepatic, renal, or uncontrolled cardiovascular disease * Clinically significant bradycardia or advanced atrioventricular conduction abnormalities * Chronic opioid use for more than 3 months before surgery * Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus or contraindications to dexamethasone administration * Inability or refusal to provide written informed consent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total postoperative opioid consumption during the first 48 hours after surgery48 hours after surgeryTotal postoperative opioid consumption will be recorded during the first 48 hours after total knee arthroplasty and converted to intravenous morphine milligram equivalents.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pain intensity at rest6 hours after surgeryPain intensity at rest will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Pain intensity during movement assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale6 hours postoperativelyPain intensity during movement will be assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale during active or passive knee movement, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.
Time to first rescue analgesia48 hours after surgeryTime from the end of surgery to the first request for or administration of rescue analgesic medication.
Quadriceps muscle strength of the operated limb6 hours postoperativelyQuadriceps muscle strength of the operated limb will be assessed using a standardized motor strength scale.
Time to first postoperative mobilization48 hours postoperativelyTime from the end of surgery to the first successful mobilization with assistance, according to the institutional rehabilitation protocol.
Length of hospital stayup to 7 daysLength of hospital stay will be defined as the number of days from surgery to hospital discharge.

Countries

Poland

Contacts

CONTACTMalgorzata Reysner, MD PhD
mreysner@ump.edu.pl+48 61 8310122
CONTACTTomasz Reysner, MD PhD
treysner@ump.edu.pl+48 61 8310122
STUDY_CHAIRMalgorzata Reysner, MD PhD

Poznan University of Medical Sciences

STUDY_DIRECTORMichał Borys, MD PhD

The John Paul II Catholic University of Lublin

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 1, 2026