Frailty Syndrome, Peritoneal Dialysis (PD)
Conditions
Brief summary
This study aims to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive nursing intervention based on the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC) on patients undergoing peritoneal dialysis with frailty syndrome. The main questions it aims to answer include: Can the ITHBC-based comprehensive nursing intervention improve patients' frailty status? Can the intervention reduce patients' nutritional risk? Can the intervention enhance patients' exercise self-efficacy, social support, and self-management behaviors? Researchers will compare the ITHBC-based comprehensive nursing intervention (intervention group) with routine care (control group) to assess the effectiveness of the intervention program. Participants: The intervention group receives the ITHBC-based comprehensive nursing intervention (including personalized assessment, knowledge and belief reinforcement, skill development, goal setting and follow-up, and social support promotion) in addition to routine care for 3 months The control group receives routine care (including admission education, standardized in-hospital health education, and monthly outpatient or telephone follow-up for 3 months) Data are collected at baseline (T0), 1 month (T1), and 3 months (T2) post-intervention Outcome measures include: frailty scores, nutritional risk scores, exercise self-efficacy scores, social support scores, and self-management behavior scores
Interventions
BEHAVIORALITHBC-Based Comprehensive Nursing Intervention
A 3-month comprehensive nursing program based on the Integrated Theory of Health Behavior Change (ITHBC), consisting of five phases: (1) personalized assessment of frailty, nutritional status, physical activity, social support, and self-management capabilities; (2) knowledge and belief reinforcement through video-based and handbook-based education; (3) skill and competency development in nutrition management, multicomponent exercise training, and medication guidance; (4) goal setting and follow-up with individualized diet and exercise plans, biweekly visits in the first month and monthly visits thereafter; and (5) social support promotion involving healthcare professionals, family members, and peer support groups.
BEHAVIORALRoutine Care
Routine nursing care for PD patients, including admission education, standardized in-hospital health education, and either outpatient or telephone follow-up once monthly for 3 months post-discharge.
Sponsors
Henan University
Study design
Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)
Intervention model description
This is a quasi-experimental study using temporal (sequential) grouping to prevent inter-group contamination. Participants admitted between March and April 2025 were assigned to the control group, and those admitted between May and June 2025 were assigned to the intervention group.
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* age ≥ 18 years; * a diagnosis of end-stage renal disease with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of \< 15 mL/min/1.73 m² ; * currently undergoing peritoneal dialysis with regular follow-up at the peritoneal dialysis clinic; * a score of ≥ 3 on the Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale; * provision of written informed consent and voluntary participation in this study.
Exclusion criteria
* presence of concurrent severe primary diseases, including malignant tumors; * cognitive impairment or a diagnosed mental illness; * limb dysfunction that precluded cooperation with the intervention.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale | Baseline, Month 1, Month 3 | The Fried Frailty Phenotype Scale was developed by Fried et al. in 2001 and is recognized as the most widely used frailty assessment tool in the fields of gerontology and nephrology. This scale includes five components: unintentional weight loss, exhaustion, reduced grip strength, slow walking speed, and decreased physical activity. One point is assigned for each criterion that is met, yielding a total score that ranges from 0 to 5. A score of 0 indicates absence of frailty; scores of 1-2 suggest pre-frailty; and scores of 3 or more indicate frailty. The Cronbach's α coefficient for this scale was reported as 0.868. |
| Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale | Baseline, Month 1, Month 3 | The Chronic Kidney Disease Self-Management Scale (CKD-SM), which was developed by Yu P. and colleagues, evaluates the self-management behavior level of patients undergoing home-based peritoneal dialysis. This scale contains 31 items, which cover four domains: dietary management (12 items), treatment management (9 items), physical activity management (5 items), and psychosocial management (5 items). Each item was scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with response options ranging from "never" to "always" and corresponding scores ranging from 1 to 4. The total score ranges from 31 to 124, with higher scores indicating stronger self-management abilities. The overall Cronbach's α coefficient of this scale was reported as 0.902, and the test-retest reliability was reported as 0.898. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Nutritional Risk Screening Tool | Baseline, Month 1, Month 3 | The Nutritional Risk Screening Tool (NRS-2002), which was developed by Kondrup and colleagues, is an evidence-based screening tool for nutritional risk. The total score is calculated as the sum of three components: a disease severity score, a nutritional status impairment score, and an age score. Both the disease severity score and the nutritional status impairment score range from 0 to 3 points, with 1 additional point being added for patients aged ≥ 70 years. The total score ranges from 0 to 7 points, and a score of ≥ 3 indicates the presence of nutritional risk. The Cronbach's α coefficient for this scale was reported as 0.760, and the criterion validity was reported as 0.670. |
| Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale | Baseline, Month 1, Month 3 | The Self-Efficacy for Exercise Scale (SEE), which was developed by Resnick and colleagues and was adapted into a Chinese version by Lee and colleagues, assesses patients' confidence in their ability to adhere to an exercise regimen. This is a single-dimension scale consisting of nine items, each scored from 0 to 10, with response options ranging from "no confidence" to "very confident." The total score ranges from 0 to 90, with higher scores indicating greater patients' confidence in maintaining regular exercise. The Cronbach's α coefficient of this scale was reported as 0.75, and the content validity index was reported as 0.90 |
| Social Support Rating Scale | Baseline, Month 1, Month 3 | The Social Support Rating Scale (SSRS), which was developed by Xiao S., assesses an individual's level of social support. This scale includes three dimensions (objective support, subjective support, and utilization of social support), comprising a total of ten items. The total score ranges from 12 to 66, with higher scores indicating a higher level of social support. The Cronbach's α coefficient for the overall scale was reported as 0.896, and the dimension-specific Cronbach's α coefficients were reported to range from 0.833 to 0.896. |
| Laboratory Parameters | Baseline, Month 3 | Serum albumin, hemoglobin, and serum total protein levels were measured to evaluate nutritional status and anemia in patients. |
Countries
China
Outcome results
None listed