Burn, Combat-Related Burn Injury, Critical Care, Intensive Care, ICU, ICU Hospitalization, Mechanical Ventilation, Mechanical Ventilation Complication, Military Activity
Conditions
Keywords
burn, Combat-Related Burn Injury, adaptive support mechanical ventilation, mechanical ventilation
Brief summary
Severe burn injury frequently requires prolonged mechanical ventilation because of inhalation injury, respiratory failure, systemic inflammation, and repeated surgical procedures. Patients with extensive burns are at high risk of ventilator-associated complications, prolonged intensive care unit (ICU) stay, and death. Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is an automated mode of mechanical ventilation that continuously adjusts breathing support according to the patient's respiratory needs and lung mechanics. Although ASV has shown potential benefits in general ICU populations, its effectiveness in patients with severe burn injuries has not been adequately studied. The purpose of this randomized controlled trial is to compare Adaptive Support Ventilation with conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult burn patients, including those with inhalation injury, drone-related burns, and thermobaric blast burns. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either ASV or conventional ventilation. The study will evaluate whether ASV improves ventilator-free days, reduces duration of mechanical ventilation, decreases ventilator-associated complications, and improves clinical outcomes. The results of this study may help identify optimal ventilation strategies for patients with severe burn injuries and improve critical care management in both civilian and military burn centers.
Detailed description
Severe burn injury is frequently complicated by respiratory failure resulting from inhalation injury, systemic inflammation, pulmonary edema, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), and prolonged critical illness. Mechanical ventilation is often required for extended periods and is associated with substantial morbidity, including ventilator-associated pneumonia, ventilator-induced lung injury, prolonged sedation exposure, and increased intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay. Modern military conflicts have introduced new mechanisms of burn injury, including drone-delivered munitions and thermobaric explosive devices. These injuries are often characterized by a combination of thermal injury, blast overpressure, airway damage, inhalation injury, and severe pulmonary dysfunction. As a result, optimization of ventilatory support has become an important component of burn critical care. Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop mode of mechanical ventilation that automatically adjusts respiratory rate, tidal volume, inspiratory pressure, and minute ventilation according to patient respiratory mechanics and predicted physiologic requirements. Previous studies in mixed ICU populations have suggested that ASV may improve patient-ventilator synchrony, reduce work of breathing, facilitate weaning, and decrease the duration of mechanical ventilation. However, evidence regarding its use in severe burn patients remains limited. The BURN-ASV Trial is a prospective randomized controlled study designed to compare Adaptive Support Ventilation with conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation in critically ill adult burn patients requiring invasive mechanical ventilation. Participants will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either ASV or conventional ventilation according to institutional standards of care. Randomization will be stratified by burn severity, inhalation injury, thermobaric injury, and the presence of ARDS. The primary objective is to determine whether ASV increases ventilator-free days during the first 28 days following randomization. Secondary objectives include evaluation of mechanical ventilation duration, ventilator-associated complications, oxygenation, ventilator mechanics, sedation and opioid requirements, ICU and hospital length of stay, and mortality. The results of this study are expected to provide evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of automated ventilation strategies in patients with severe burn injuries and may contribute to future recommendations for respiratory support in both civilian and military burn intensive care settings.
Interventions
Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) is a closed-loop mode of invasive mechanical ventilation that automatically adjusts respiratory rate, tidal volume, inspiratory pressure, and minute ventilation according to patient respiratory mechanics and predicted physiologic requirements while maintaining lung-protective ventilation principles.
Conventional invasive mechanical ventilation delivered using pressure-controlled or volume-controlled modes according to institutional standards of care and lung-protective ventilation principles, including low tidal volume ventilation and limitation of airway pressures.
Sponsors
Study design
Intervention model description
Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either Adaptive Support Ventilation (ASV) or conventional lung-protective mechanical ventilation. Randomization will be performed using a computer-generated allocation sequence with stratification according to burn severity, presence of inhalation injury, thermobaric injury, and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) at enrollment. Participants will remain in their assigned treatment group throughout the study, and outcomes will be compared between groups using an intention-to-treat approach.
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Age 18 years or older. * Thermal burn injury involving ≥20% total body surface area (TBSA). * Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation expected to exceed 24 hours. * Admission to a participating intensive care unit within 48 hours of injury. * Burn injury resulting from conventional flame burns, explosion-related burns, drone-related burns, or thermobaric blast burns. * Written informed consent provided by the patient or a legally authorized representative.
Exclusion criteria
* Age younger than 18 years. * Pregnancy or breastfeeding. * Pre-existing chronic respiratory failure requiring home oxygen therapy or long-term mechanical ventilation. * Severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD GOLD IV) or other end-stage pulmonary disease. * Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) at the time of enrollment. * Severe traumatic brain injury requiring controlled hyperventilation. * Expected death within 24 hours of ICU admission. * Do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order or limitations of life-sustaining treatment. * Previous enrollment in the current study. * Participation in another interventional trial that may interfere with study outcomes.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Ventilator-Free Days at Day 28 | 28 days | Ventilator-free days are defined as the number of days alive and free from invasive mechanical ventilation during the first 28 days after randomization. |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Mechanical Ventilation | Up to 28 days | Total duration of invasive mechanical ventilation from randomization until successful liberation from ventilatory support. |
| Oxygenation Status | Days 1, 3, 7, and 14 after randomization | Partial pressure of arterial oxygen to inspired oxygen fraction ratio (PaO₂/FiO₂). |
| ICU Length of Stay | From randomization until hospital discharge, up to 90 days | Number of days from ICU admission until ICU discharge. |
| Sedative Medication Exposure | First 28 days after randomization | Cumulative doses of propofol, midazolam, ketamine, and dexmedetomidine administered during ICU stay. |
| 28-Day Mortality | 28 days | All-cause mortality occurring within 28 days after randomization. |
| 90-Day Mortality | 90 days | All-cause mortality occurring within 90 days after randomization. |