Skip to content

EFFECT OF MULLIGAN CERVICAL SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDE ON POSTURAL STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NECK PAIN

EFFECT OF MULLIGAN CERVICAL SUSTAINED NATURAL APOPHYSEAL GLIDE ON POSTURAL STABILITY IN PATIENTS WITH CHRONIC NECK PAIN

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07673575
Acronym
SNAG Mulligan
Enrollment
44
Registered
2026-06-29
Start date
2026-08-20
Completion date
2026-11-01
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Chronic Neck Pain With Mobility Deficits, Chronic Neck Pain With Mobility Deficits (> 3 Months)

Keywords

SNAG, chronic neck pain with mobility deficits, MULLIGAN

Brief summary

This study seeks to address the identified research gap by objectively investigating the effect of Mulligan Cervical SNAGs on postural stability in individuals with chronic neck pain and mobility impairments. The findings aim to provide evidence-based insights into whether restoring joint mobility through this manual intervention can effectively enhance sensorimotor control and balance performance. The study aims to determine if adding SNAG to a conventional exercise program provides superior improvements in balance indices (OSI, APSI, MLSI), Pain, functional disability, Range of motion, Joint position sense, and kinesiophobia compared to exercise alone. The primary purpose of this study is to answer the following research questions: * Does the application of cervical SNAGs lead to a significant improvement in the postural stability of patients with chronic neck pain with mobility deficits? * Is there a correlation between the improvement in cervical range of motion (ROM) following SNAGs and the enhancement of postural control performance?

Detailed description

Chronic neck pain associated with mobility deficits is a prevalent musculoskeletal condition that extends beyond localized discomfort to involve significant sensorimotor disturbances. The cervical spine plays a pivotal role in postural control due to its high density of mechanoreceptors and its intricate integration with the vestibular and visual systems. Patients with CNP frequently exhibit impaired proprioception and increased postural sway. This leads to a higher risk of falls and functional limitations. If SNAG is proven effective, the results will help clinicians justify the inclusion of Mulligan SNAGs in rehabilitation protocols not only to restore mobility and reduce pain but also to address balance impairments and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain. From a patient perspective, these improvements may enhance functional performance, confidence during movement, and quality of life. From a socioeconomic perspective, improving functional abilities and reducing disability may decrease healthcare costs, work absenteeism, and the long-term burden associated with chronic neck pain. Scientifically, this study may contribute to the growing body of evidence regarding the sensorimotor and balance-related effects of Mulligan SNAG techniques and provide further insight into the relationship between cervical mobility, postural stability, and kinesiophobia in patients with chronic neck pain.

Interventions

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST1- The Biodex Balance System (BBS)

The Biodex Balance System SD Model 950-441(Biodex Medical Systems, Inc.) is a multi-dimensional (static and dynamic) postural control assessment and training system. It provides objective, valid, and reliable measures of a patient's ability to balance on stable and unstable surfaces. It measures the overall Stability Index (OSI), anterior/posterior stability index (APSI), and medial/lateral stability index (MLSI). Its intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) reliability is R = 0.92 (OSI), R = 0.89 (APSI), and R = 0.93 (MLSI). Chronic neck pain subjects have demonstrated significantly worse Biodex balance performance across OSI, APSI, and MLSI

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST2-The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

The Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a unidimensional measure of pain intensity that serves as a segmented numerical version of the visual analog scale (VAS). It consists of an 11-point scale where the respondent selects a whole number from 0 to 10 that best reflects the intensity of their pain, with 0 representing "no pain" and 10 representing the "worst imaginable pain" . The NPRS has demonstrated high construct and criterion validity for assessing pain severity in patients with chronic musculoskeletal disorders. It is considered a valid tool for differentiating pain characteristics between individuals with chronic neck pain and healthy controls. The research suggests that the NPRS is often more responsive to clinical changes and easier for patients to comprehend than the traditional VAS .This scale is characterized by excellent test-retest reliability (ICC: 0.95),

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST3- The Neck Disability Index (Arabic version) for functional disability

Neck disability index (NDI) is self-reported assessment includes ten items: pain severity, personal care, lifting, work, headaches, concentration, sleeping, driving, reading, and recreation. Higher scores imply a greater level of disability. Arabic version of the NDI was used to assess Arabic patients with neck pain, as the Arabic version of the NDI is reliable and valid

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST4- Digital Inclinometer for Cervical Range of Motion

A digital inclinometer is a handheld electronic device used to objectively measure the degrees of spinal curvature by detecting inclination relative to the force of gravity.In cervical spine assessment, it is used to quantify movements including flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation.The digital inclinometer is recognized as a highly valid and reliable instrument for measuring cervical range of motion (CROM). Recent studies have reported excellent intra-rater and inter-rater reliability (ICC \> 0.85), particularly for cervical rotation and lateral flexion. It is often preferred over traditional goniometry because it provides precise, objective, and quantitative data that is less susceptible to manual measurement error.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST5- Arabic Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11)

The TSK-11 is a shortened, 11-item version of the original Tampa Scale, designed to assess kinesiophobia. Defined as an irrational and debilitating fear of physical movement resulting from a feeling of vulnerability to painful injury or re-injury . The Arabic version was developed to provide a linguistically and culturally adapted tool for assessing fear-avoidance beliefs in Arabic-speaking populations. The Arabic version of the TSK-11 has been cross- culturally validated and demonstrates strong psychometric properties. It exhibits high internal consistency, with Cronbach's alpha values typically ranging from 0.86 to 0.90, and excellent test-retest reliability. It shows significant concurrent validity, as scores are strongly correlated with pain intensity (NPRS) and functional disability measures like the Neck Disability Index.

DIAGNOSTIC_TEST6- Overhead LASER pointer for Cervical proprioception

An overhead LASER pointer will be used to assess cervical proprioception by performing the Cervical Joint Position Error (JPE) test. The Joint Position Sense Error (JPSE) is considered one of the essential measures to clinically assess cervical proprioception. The test has good (ICC: 0.77-0.78)

OTHERMulligan Cervical SNAG Technique Protocol

Patient positioning: Seated or standing, with spine in neutral or slight flexion. * Therapist hand placement: Thumb or fingers on the targeted cervical vertebra (e.g., C2-C7 or upper thoracic T1-T4). * Direction of glide: Anterior and upward glide along the plane of the facet joint, synchronized with the patient's active movement (e.g., rotation, extension) * Repetitions: 10 repetitions per session, each held for 10 seconds, with rest intervals. * Session structure: SNAG mobilizations performed first, followed by conventional exercises. * Cervical spine: Targeted for joint position sense, pain, and dizziness. Technique variations: • Minor adjustments in force direction to optimize symptom reduction.

OTHERConventional therapy group

Based on the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) Clinical Practice Guidelines for Neck Pain with Mobility Deficits, participants in the conventional therapy group received a multimodal treatment program consisting of mobility exercises, strengthening and endurance training, stretching exercises, and patient education * Cervical and thoracic mobility exercises. * Strengthening and endurance exercises for the deep cervical flexors, cervical extensors, and scapulothoracic muscles. * Stretching exercises for the upper trapezius, levator scapulae, pectoral, and cervical muscles. * Patient education regarding posture, ergonomics, activity modification, and self-management strategies. Sequencing: • SNAG mobilizations performed at session start, followed by active exercises and stretching Manual therapy timing: • SNAG component adds \~10 minutes to a 20-minute exercise session

Sponsors

Menna Allah Ahmed Marei Elnaggar
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Group A (Experimental: Mulligan cervical SNAG plus conventional physiotherapy) or Group B (Control: conventional physiotherapy alone). Outcome assessments will be conducted at three time points: baseline, at eight weeks, immediately after completion of the final intervention session, and after four weeks for a short follow-up assessment (Follow-up assessment will be conducted 4 weeks after completion of the 8-week intervention period to evaluate retention of treatment effects).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 45 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* The patients will be selected according to the following criteria: 1. Adults aged between 20 and 45 years 2. Body mass index from 18.5 - 24.99 kg/ m2. 3. Chronic neck pain lasting ≥3 months 4. Diagnosis of neck pain with mobility deficits, including restricted cervical ROM, and pain provoked with movement 5. Presence of cervical hypomobility confirmed by segmental mobility assessment on clinical examination 6. Pain intensity ≥3/10 on the numerical Pain Rating Scale 7. Reduced cervical range of motion in at least one direction measured objectively (by digital inclinometer) 8. Ability to stand independently without assistive devices (required for postural stability assessment)

Exclusion criteria

* The patients will be excluded if they present with: 1. Specific causes of neck pain, such as fracture, tumor, infection, inflammatory disease, or cervical myelopathy, confirmed by X Ray and physical examination 2. Cervical radiculopathy or neurological deficits (e.g., dermatomal sensory loss, reflex changes, or muscle weakness) 3. History of cervical spine surgery or recent trauma (within the last 6 months) 4. Vestibular disorders or conditions affecting balance (e.g., vertigo unrelated to cervical origin) 5. Temporomandibular disorders, significant shoulder pathology, and shoulder surgeries that may influence cervical movement or outcomes 6. Participation in physiotherapy or manual therapy for neck pain within the previous 3 months 7. Pregnancy or any medical condition contraindicates manual therapy 8. History of chronic ankle instability 9. Any lower limb pathology affecting balance

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
A) Postural Stability (Biodex Balance System)before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.Overall Stability Index (OSI) - total amount of platform deviation. * Anterior-Posterior Stability Index (APSI) - sagittal plane sway. * Medial-Lateral Stability Index (MLSI) - frontal plane sway. These indices are mathematically defined in research: APSI and MLSI Calculated from the deviation of platform angles along X and Y axes (Higher scores = worse balance Reliability Evidence * ICC OSI = 0.92, APSI = 0.89, MLSI = 0.93 * Indicates excellent reliability for research. For chronic cervical pain with hypomobility, the most appropriate Biodex protocol (supported by evidence) is: * Static Postural Stability Test: * Platform locked * 3 trials × 20 s * Eyes open * Compute OSI, APSI, MLSI Dynamic Postural Stability Test * Platform level 8 (commonly used mid-level) * 3 trials × 20 s * Eyes open A) Compute OSI, APSI, MLSI

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Numerical Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.The NPRS is an 11-point self-reported scale (0-10) for pain intensity. 1. Ask the patient to rate their pain intensity on a scale from 0 = no pain to 10 = worst possible pain. 2. It can assess current pain, pain in the last 24 hours . 3. The scale is valid, reliable, and widely used in clinical and research settings. Standard instructions to participants "Please rate your pain intensity on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 means no pain at all, and 10 means the worst pain imaginable." This standardized wording is supported by multiple trials.
Neck Disability Index (Arabic Version)before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.The Arabic NDI is validated and used widely in neck pain research. * The patient completes 10 items, each scored 0-5. * Total scores range from 0-50 (or converted to %). * Disability categories: * 0-4: No disability * 5-14: Mild * 15-24: Moderate * 25-34: Severe Procedure * Provide the patient with the questionnaire. * Explain each item when needed (common in Arabic versions). * Sum the scores and classify disability.
Digital Inclinometer for Cervical ROMbefore the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.Multiple studies describe standardized inclinometer protocols Devices show good validity compared with 3D motion capture 1. Patient is usually seated upright with feet on the floor. 2. Place the inclinometer on the vertex of the head aligned with T1 or other fixed reference, depending on the device. 3. Measure flexion, extension, lateral flexion, and rotation. 4. Perform 3 trials per direction and use the mean.
Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-11, Arabic Version)before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.Kinesiophobia was assessed using the Arabic version of the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK-AV-11), which is a valid and reliable tool for evaluating fear of movement in Arabic-speaking patients. It consists of 11 items scored on a 4-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating greater fear of movement Brief and validated for chronic pain including neck pain Contains 11 items, each scored 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). Procedure 1. Provide the questionnaire. 2. Ensure the patient answers all 11 items. 3. Sum all item scores (minimum 11, maximum 55). 4. Higher scores = higher kinesiophobia
Overhead Laser Pointer for Cervical Proprioception (Joint Position Error Test)before the intervention, after 8 weeks, and at a 4-week follow- up.Setup * Attach a laser pointer to the patient's forehead or headband * Place a target on the wall at a distance of 90 cm. * Align the laser to the center of the target at the neutral head position. Testing procedure 1. Patient sits upright, eyes closed (no visual feedback allowed) 2. Patient moves head: 1. Rotation right 2. Rotation left 3. Flexion 4. Extension 3. Patient returns to what they believe is the original neutral position. 4. Record the deviation in degrees from the center of the target. 5. Repeat 3-5 trials per direction; average the error

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

CONTACTMenna-Allah A Elnaggar, demonstrator
me370433@gmail.com+201069014391
CONTACTRewan M Aloush, Teaching Assistant
rewan.aloush@gmail.com+201024232512

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 30, 2026