Skip to content

A Trial Comparing GQ1005 and T-DM1 in Patients With HER2-Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Breast Cancer

A Phase III, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Controlled Study Comparing GQ1005 and Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Patients With HER2-Positive Unresectable or Metastatic Breast Cancer Previously Treated With Trastuzumab and a Taxane

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07673029
Enrollment
228
Registered
2026-06-29
Start date
2025-01-10
Completion date
2028-01-09
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This study is designed to compare efficacy and safety of GQ1005 versus T-DM1 in HER2-positive, unresectable and/or metastatic breast cancer patients previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane.

Detailed description

This is a phase III, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study comparing GQ1005 with Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in patients with HER2-positive unresectable or metastatic breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane. Approximately 228 patients with unresectable or metastatic HER2-positive breast cancer will be randomized 1:1 to receive GQ1005 or T-DM1, respectively.

Interventions

DRUGGQ1005

Administered I.V.

DRUGT-DM1

Administered I.V.

Sponsors

GeneQuantum Healthcare (Suzhou) Co., Ltd.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male or female adults ≥ 18 years at the time of voluntary signing of informed consent. * Pathologically confirmed unresectable or metastatic HER2 positive breast cancer previously treated with trastuzumab and taxane * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status score is 0 or 1. * Presence of at least one measurable lesion according to RECIST v1.1 * Expected survival time ≥ 12 weeks. * Patients must give informed consent to this study and voluntarily sign written informed consent form prior to the study NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/

Exclusion criteria

may apply.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Blinded Independent Central Review (BICR) assessment per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Version 1.1 (RECIST 1.1)Up to approximately 24 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Survival (OS)Up to approximately 24 months
Progression Free Survival (PFS) by Investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1Up to approximately 24 months
Objective response rate (ORR) by BICR and investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1Up to approximately 24 months
Duration of response (DoR) by BICR and investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1Up to approximately 24 months
Disease Control Rate (DCR) by BICR and investigator assessment per RECIST 1.1Up to approximately 24 months
Adverse events:Number and percentage of patients who report serious adverse events (SAEs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), TEAEs leading to study drug discontinuation, adverse events of special interest (AESIs) (graded according to the NationaUp to approximately 24 months
PK parameters:Plasma concentrations of GQ1005 ADC, total anti-HER2 antibody and free toxin DXd at each time pointUp to approximately 24 months
Anti-drug antibodies (ADA):Number and percentage of patients who develop anti-drug antibody (ADA).Up to approximately 24 months
Quality of Life Assessment:Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by EQ-5D-5LUp to approximately 24 monthsChange from baseline in EQ-5D-5L health state utility index score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score. VAS score range from 0-100, higher scores indicate better health status.
Quality of Life Assessment:Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ) - C30Up to approximately 24 monthsChange from baseline in the functioning/symptom/global quality of life (QoL) subscales of EORTC QLQ-C30. Scale scores range from 0-100. For functioning and global QoL scales, higher scores indicate better functioning or global health status. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.
Quality of Life Assessment:Change in Health-Related Quality of Life Assessed by EORTC QLQ-BR45Up to approximately 24 monthsChange from baseline in the functioning/symptom subscales of EORTC QLQ-BR45. Scale scores range from 0-100. For functioning scales, higher scores indicate better functioning. For symptom scales, higher scores indicate greater symptom burden.

Countries

China

Contacts

CONTACTZhenxing Yang
yangzx@genequantum.com+86 13801896162
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORZefei Jiang, M.D.

The Fifth Medical Center of the Chinese People's Liberation Army General Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 30, 2026