Skip to content

Muscle Function Response to Resistance Band Training in Older Adults With Impaired Muscle Power

Muscle Function Response to Resistance Band Training in Older Adults With Impaired Muscle Power

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07672834
Enrollment
104
Registered
2026-06-29
Start date
2024-06-02
Completion date
2027-10-30
Last updated
2026-07-01

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ageing

Keywords

muscle power, Balance, functional movement

Brief summary

To investigate the effect of an fitness advice and resistance band exercise intervention on balance, muscle function, and power in an older people population who have low muscle power.

Interventions

OTHERResistance band exercise

Participants will be given a resistance band and at set of exercises that target the lower extremities and asked to perform these as three sets of 15 repetitions, 2 times a week.

BEHAVIORALFitness advice

Participants will be undertake a series of functional fitness tests and have their performance evaluated against normative values for their age and sex. Following this advice will be given with the aim of empowering change in physical activity participation.

Sponsors

Brunel University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Participants will be of male or female sex and free from known neurological health conditions (e.g. Peripheral Neuropathy, Parkinson's Disease, Stroke, Migraines, Epilepsy) or musculoskeletal injury. * low muscle power determined as a score of 8.1 and 9 seconds or more for the completion of the 5 times sit to stand test for males and females respectively

Exclusion criteria

* Neurological health condition or musculoskeletal injury at the time of baseline testing * individuals aged under 50 * individuals who have been told to avoid strenuous physical activity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postural swayafter 12 weeksUsing a force plate recording at 100Hz for 30 seconds, 5 eyes open and eyes closed trials will be recorded at baseline and after 12 weeks of resistance band exercises. Using the Centre of Pressure measurements provided. Linear (e.g. total sway path length and sway path in the medio-lateral and anterior-posterior directions, measured in meters) and non-linear (fractal dimension, unitless measurement units) postural control measurements will be calculated.
Five times sit to stand timeAfter 12 weeksSitting on a chair, participants stand to full leg extension, and then return to a seated position 5 times, and the time taken recorded in seconds.
Single leg stand timeAfter 12 weeksThis is the length of time, in seconds, an individual can stand on a single leg for as long as possible (up to a maximum of 90 seconds)
Timed up and goAfter 12 weeksThis is the time, in seconds, it takes for an individual to stand from a seated position, without using their hands, walk around a cone which is 3 meters away, before returning to the seated position.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fear of fallingAfter 12 weeksFalls efficacy scale - international questionnaire (https://sites.manchester.ac.uk/fes-i). The total score of questions will be used in the analysis.
Perceived change in body, balance and powerAfter 12 weeksUsing a 15 point Likert Global Rating of Change scale (GRC) to measure perceived change. +7 to +1: Ranging from "A very great deal better" (+7) to "A little better" (+1) 0: No change -1 to -7: Ranging from "A little worse" (-1) to "A very great deal worse" (-7) This scale will be completed for the measurement of perceived change in body, balance and power separately (i.e. there will be a separate scores given for each domain).
Self-efficacy for exerciseAfter 12 weeksSelf-efficacy for exercise questionnaire (SEE) (https://www.sralab.org/sites/default/files/2017-06/Self-efficacy%20for%20exercise\_Website\_PDF.pdf). The total score of 9 questions will be used in the analysis. The Scale: Each question is rated from 0 (Not Confident) to 10 (Very Confident). Scoring: Add the numbers for all 9 responses together. Range: Total scores range from 0 to 90. Interpretation: Higher totals indicate a greater level of self-efficacy (stronger belief in your ability to maintain an exercise routine).
Quality of life12 weeksThe Older People Quality of Life questionnaire (OPQOL) will be completed (https://ilcuk.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/OPQOL-full-questionnaire.pdf). Each subsection of the OPQOL will be analysed separately. This is scored on a 5 point scale 1 = very good to 5 = very bad. The scores are reversed so that a higher value suggests better quality of life. In each subsection values are summed. Subsections Live overall = min score is 4 and max score is 20 Health = min score is 4 and max score is 20 Social relationships = min score is 5 and max score is 25 Independence, control over life, freedom = min score is 4 and max score is 20 Home and neighbourhood = min score is 4 and max score is 20 Financial circumstances = min score is 4 and max score is 20 Leisure and activities = min score is 6 and max score is 30
Muscle powerAfter 12 weeksUsing a Biodex dynamometer, 5 practice and 5 trial concentric muscle efforts will be performed with the peak torque (newton meters), time to peak torque (seconds) and peak torque (newton meters) at 0.18 seconds will be recorded.
Grip strengthAfter 12 weeksusing and hand strength dynamometer, grip strength will be measured as the maximum value of 2 maximal efforts using their dominant hand. This is measured in kilograms.

Countries

United Kingdom

Contacts

CONTACTDaniel C Low, Doctor of Philosophy
Daniel.low@brunel.ac.uk+44 01895 268931

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 2, 2026