Skip to content

Quadriceps Tendon vs Peroneus Longus Tendon in ACL Reconstruction

A Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Quadriceps Tendon and Peroneus Longus Tendon Autografts in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Clinical, Functional, and Gait Analysis Outcomes

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07671729
Enrollment
60
Registered
2026-06-26
Start date
2026-05-01
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Keywords

ACL reconstruction, Anterior cruciate ligament, Quadriceps tendon autograft, Peroneus longus tendon autograft, Gait analysis, Return to sport, Knee stability, Ankle muscle strength, Functional outcomes, Randomized controlled trial

Brief summary

This prospective randomized clinical trial aims to compare quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury undergoing primary reconstruction surgery will be randomly assigned to one of the two graft groups. Clinical examination findings, return-to-sport outcomes, ankle muscle strength, ankle-related functional scores, and gait analysis parameters will be evaluated at 6 months and 12 months postoperatively. The study aims to investigate both knee-related functional outcomes and donor site morbidity associated with graft harvesting techniques.

Detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most commonly performed orthopedic procedures for restoring knee stability and enabling return to sports activities after ACL injury. Various autograft options have been described for ACL reconstruction, including hamstring tendon, bone-patellar tendon-bone, quadriceps tendon, and more recently, peroneus longus tendon grafts. Each graft option has unique biomechanical characteristics, advantages, and potential donor site morbidities. Quadriceps tendon autografts have gained increasing popularity because of their adequate graft diameter, favorable biomechanical properties, and relatively low donor site complications. Peroneus longus tendon autografts have also emerged as a promising alternative graft source with satisfactory clinical outcomes and sufficient graft size. However, concerns remain regarding donor site morbidity, particularly potential effects on ankle muscle strength and ankle function following peroneus longus tendon harvesting. This prospective randomized study aims to compare quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autografts in patients undergoing primary ACL reconstruction. Patients will be randomly assigned into two groups according to graft type. Clinical evaluations, functional knee scores, return-to-sport outcomes, ankle muscle strength assessments, ankle-related functional scores, and gait analysis parameters will be assessed during postoperative follow-up. Follow-up evaluations will be performed at 6 months and 12 months after surgery. The findings of this study are expected to contribute to graft selection strategies in ACL reconstruction by providing comparative data regarding clinical outcomes, functional recovery, gait characteristics, and donor site morbidity.

Interventions

PROCEDUREAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Quadriceps Tendon Autograft

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using quadriceps tendon autograft.

PROCEDUREAnterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Using Peroneus Longus Tendon Autograft

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction performed using peroneus longus tendon autograft.

Sponsors

Acibadem University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Intervention model description

Participants will be randomly assigned to undergo anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using either quadriceps tendon autograft or peroneus longus tendon autograft in parallel groups.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients diagnosed with anterior cruciate ligament rupture * Patients scheduled for primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction * Age between 18 and 50 years * Ability to provide informed consent * Willingness to comply with postoperative rehabilitation and follow-up evaluations

Exclusion criteria

* Previous ligament reconstruction surgery on the affected knee * Multi-ligament knee injuries requiring additional ligament reconstruction * Severe osteoarthritis of the knee * Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction * Neuromuscular disorders affecting lower extremity function * Active infection * Inability to comply with follow-up protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Score12 months postoperativelyComparison of postoperative subjective knee function between quadriceps tendon and peroneus longus tendon autograft groups using the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Return to Sport RateAssessment of return to pre-injury level of sports activity following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.6 and 12 months postoperatively
Ankle Plantar Flexion Strength6 and 12 months postoperativelyIsokinetic ankle plantar flexion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during plantar flexion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Ankle Dorsiflexion Strength6 and 12 months postoperativelyIsokinetic ankle dorsiflexion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during dorsiflexion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Ankle Inversion Strength6 and 12 months postoperativelyIsokinetic ankle inversion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during inversion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Ankle Eversion Strength6 and 12 months postoperativelyIsokinetic ankle eversion strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during eversion will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Ankle Rotational Strength6 and 12 months postoperativelyIsokinetic ankle rotational strength will be evaluated using an isokinetic dynamometer. Peak torque (Nm) during rotational movements will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Ground Reaction Force6 and 12 months postoperativelyLower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Ground reaction force (N) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Force Asymmetry6 and 12 months postoperativelyLower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Force asymmetry (%) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.
Weight Distribution6 and 12 months postoperativelyLower extremity biomechanical performance will be assessed using the VALD ForceDecks dual force plate system. Weight distribution (%) during standardized standing and functional testing tasks will be recorded and compared between study groups.

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 27, 2026