Skip to content

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave in Planter Fasciitis

Effectiveness of Extracorporeal Shockwave on Gait Parameters and Quality of Life in Planter Fasciitis

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07669831
Enrollment
175
Registered
2026-06-25
Start date
2024-04-01
Completion date
2026-05-30
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Effectiveness, Extracoropral Shock Wave Therapy, Observational Cohort Study, Planter Fasciitis

Keywords

planter fasciitis, Quality of life, Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy, Effectiveness, Observational Cohort Study

Brief summary

Extracorporeal Shockwave (ESW) is a popular, non-invasive approach that arisen in line to stimulate healing via acoustic waves targeting lesion site i.e., planter fasciitis. Therefore, current clinical trial targets to determine the long-term effectiveness of ESW on Calcaneal spur in terms of quality of life, functional, and clinical manifestations, as well addressing real barriers for ESW approach among whom diagnosed with planter fasciitis.

Detailed description

Worldwide ESW protocol parameters' discrepancy still a research gap, mainly in terms of calcaneal spur i.e., sessions' number, applications' parameters. Therefore, current clinical trial was conducted to address the effectiveness of ESW on planter fasciitis on long-term, plus identifying the real barriers addressed by sufferers.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Adly A Adam
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 59 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Individuals diagnosed with planter fasciitis, whom age ranged between 25-59 years old, with nearby 3 months of clinical manifestations mainly heel pain. * Whom have plantar medial heel pain: most noticeable with initial steps after a period of inactivity, but also worse following prolonged weight-bearing, * Whom had pain with palpation of the proximal insertion of the plantar fascia. * Whom had positive windlass test.

Exclusion criteria

* Any individual whom underwent feet or ankle surgical interventions, received steroid injections within the past 3 months, also whom have deep venous thrombosis, or had a tarsal tunnel syndrome, diabetic neuropathies or any sort of tumors, lymphatic lesions.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Pressure Pain Threshold1- At Baseline, 2- Post-Treatment, 3- After 6 months as long-term follow-upA valid, reliable Pressure Algometer device, that is calibrated per each evaluation, in line to identify well-addressed pressure pain threshold, that spread from the plantar calcaneal tuberosity for each participant.
American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Society Scale (AOFAS)1- At baseline, 2- Post-treatment, 3- After 6 months as long-term follow-up.a 9-item questionnaire classified into three subscales: 1) level of pain consists of 1 item and its score ranges from 0 to 40; 40 points = no pain and 0 points = severe pain; 2) function consists of 7 items (Activity limitations, support requirements, maximum continuous walking distance, walking surface, gait abnormalities, sagittal motion, hind foot motion, ankle hind-foot stability), and its score ranges from 0 (severe function impairment score) to 50 points (full function score); and 3) foot alignment consists of 1 item; its score ranges from 0 to 10 points; good alignment of ankle and foot equals 10 points and zero indicates severe malalignment, symptoms. It was used for measuring functional recovery after different foot and ankle problems. The total score of the scale ranged from 0 to 100 points; (0) indicates the worst, and (100) shows no symptoms or impairments.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Visual Analogue Scale1- At Baseline, 2- Post-Treatment, 3- After 6 months as long-term follow-up10-point, as 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain they can imagine). VAS scores ≤3.4 demarcated as mild pain, 3.5 to 7.4 as moderate pain, and ≥7.5 as severe pain. VAS is a simple, valid, as well as successful way to keep monitor of how a patient's pain is changing over time, and it has been utilized extensively in varied adult groups with a strong evidence of test-retest reliability (ICC= 0.99, 95%CI 0.989-0.992)
Arabic version of the foot function index (FFI)1- At Baseline, 2- Post-Treatment, 3- After 6 months as long-term follow-upa widely used self-reporting measure used to assess the impact of foot pathology on pain, disability, and activity limitation. It is a reliable and sensitive outcome measure for patients with foot and ankle disorders. The FFI's subscale scores range from 0% to 100%, with higher scores indicating lower function and a poorer quality of life

Countries

Egypt

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAdnan AA Gharib

GOTHI

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026