Skip to content

European Multi-Centre Post-Market Registry on Thoracic Endovascular Arch Repair Using Castor™ and Cratos™

European Multi-Centre Castor™ and Cratos™ Branched Endovascular Arch Repair Registry

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07668687
Acronym
CEDAR
Enrollment
100
Registered
2026-06-25
Start date
2025-09-12
Completion date
2033-12-01
Last updated
2026-06-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Aneurysm of Aorta, Thoracic, Dissection of Thoracic Aorta, Dissection of Thoracic Descending Aorta, Intramural Hematoma of the Thoracic Aorta, Penetrating Aortic Ulcers (PAUs), Ulcer-like Projection (ULP)

Keywords

Castor™ Branched Aortic Stent Graft System, Cratos™ Branched Aortic Stent Graft System, TEVAR, thoracic aortic aneurysm (TAA), Penetrating Aortic Ulcer (PAU), Aortic Intramural Haematoma (IMH), Ulcer-like projection (ULP), thoracic aortic dissection

Brief summary

The Castor™ and Cratos™ Branched Aortic Stent Graft Systems are medical devices designed for the minimally invasive endovascular treatment of thoracic aortic pathologies in the descending aorta. The goal of this multi-centre retrospective and prospective observational registry study is to capture the short-, medium- to long-term safety and performance data of how Castor™ and Cratos™ stent-grafts work in real-world settings (everyday medical practice). The aim is to study approximately 100 patients in European hospitals, with competitive enrollment.

Detailed description

The CEDAR registry is a post-market clinical study with retrospective and prospective enrollment and retrospective and prospective data collection.

Interventions

DEVICEImplantation with Castor™ stent graft

Treatment of subjects diagnosed with thoracic aortic pathologies using the Castor™ Branched Aortic Stent-Graft and Delivery System. Follow up as per institutional standard of care.

DEVICEImplantation with Cratos™ stent graft

Treatment of subjects diagnosed with thoracic aortic pathologies using the Cratos™ Branched Aortic Stent-Graft and Delivery System. Follow up as per institutional standard of care.

Sponsors

Shanghai MicroPort Endovascular MedTech(Group)Co., Ltd
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
OTHER

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Implantation of a Castor™ or Cratos™ single branch endoprothesis with incorporation of the left subclavian artery * Age \>18 years

Exclusion criteria

* Patients allergic to the materials of the device; * Patients with severe or potentially systemic infections that increase the chance of graft infection; * Minors and pregnant women; * Branch for other supra-aortic vessels than the LSA * Rejection of participation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
30-day all-cause mortality30 daysA measure of the total number of patients participating in the CEDAR study who die from any cause within 30 days of the implantation of the branched aortic stent graft - Castor™ or Cratos™.
Technical success rate24 hoursTechnical Success is defined as successful access and deployment of the endograft, including implantation of the branch into the target vessel, with patency of the branch and no evidence of type I or type III endoleak on completion angiography or cone-beam computed tomography. Additional intra-operative measures to achieve this, such as ballooning or branch extension with additional stent grafts, are also considered as primary technical success.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical success rate at 30 days, 6 months and at 1 - 5 yearsat 30 days, 6 months and at 1 - 5 yearsThis is defined as Technical Success plus the absence of aortic related death, aortic rupture, graft infection, sac expansion \> 5mm, graft migration \>10mm, persistent endoleaks type I and III requiring re-intervention, conversion to open surgery, permanent paraplegia, disabling stroke or permanent dialysis.
Rate of Endoleakat 30 days, 6 months, and at 1 - 5 years
Branch occlusion rateat 30 days, 6 months, and 1-5 year
Rate of perioperative retrograde type A aortic dissections30 days, 6 months, and at 1 - 5 years
Rate of reinterventionat 30 days, 6 months, and at 1-5 years
Combined endpoint major adverse eventsat 30-days, 6 months and 1 yearall-cause mortality, myocardial infarction, respiratory failure with postoperative prolonged mechanical ventilation \> 24h, renal function declining in a GFR \> 50% reduction to perioperative, bowel ischemia requiring surgical resection, major stroke and permanent paraplegia.
Incidence rate of spinal cord ischemia for the duration of the studyat 30 days, 6 months, and at 1 - 5 years
Stroke rateat 30 days, 6 months, and at 1 - 5 years
All-cause mortalityat 30 days, 6 months, and at 1 - 5 years

Countries

Germany, Switzerland

Contacts

CONTACTMaggie Shen, MD MSc
maggie.shen@endovastec-lm.com00441235750800
CONTACTAnne Woodman
anne.woodman@endovastec-lm.com00441235750800
STUDY_DIRECTORJing Wang

Shanghai MicroPort Endovascular MedTech(Group)Co., Ltd

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 26, 2026