Skip to content

Influence of Acetal Resin Versus Nylon Elastic Cap on Crestal Bone Loss in Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture

Influence of Acetal Resin Versus Nylon Elastic Cap on Crestal Bone Loss in Mandibular Implant-Supported Overdenture

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07666763
Acronym
AcetalResin
Enrollment
22
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2026-07-01
Completion date
2027-08-01
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Bone Loss, Pocket, Periodontal

Brief summary

Objective: To evaluate and compare the effect of two different attachment housing materials-Acetal Resin (Polyoxymethylene) versus conventional Nylon elastic caps-on marginal crestal bone loss around dental implants supporting a mandibular overdenture. It also evaluates peri-implant clinical tissue health by measuring pocket depth and the gingival bleeding index.

Detailed description

Study Design & Timeline: A prospective, double-blind, randomized controlled clinical trial with a 1:1 allocation ratio. Clinical and radiographic outcomes will be evaluated at overdenture insertion (baseline), and at 6 and 12 months post-insertion.ethodology & Analysis: Pre-operative bone volume will be assessed via Cone Beam CT (CBCT). Crestal bone loss will be measured using the long cone parallel radiographic technique , while pocket depth and gingival bleeding will be measured using a William's graduated probing device. Data will undergo normality testing to determine the use of parametric (Independent t-test, Repeated Measures ANOVA) or non-parametric (Mann-Whitney, Friedman) statistical analyse

Interventions

overdenture supported by implants

DEVICEnylon

overdenture supported by implants

Sponsors

Future University in Egypt
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
40 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Completely edentulous mandible. * Sufficient bone height/width in mandibular residual ridges. * Angles classification class I. * Sufficient inter-arch distance

Exclusion criteria

* TMJ disorders. * Diabetic * Hypertensive * Cancer patients. * Smoker * Osteoporosis. * Immunosuppressive disease * Any disease affecting bone/implant stability.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in crestal bone levelsone yearmm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
pocket depth changesone yearmm

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026