Skip to content

CoSMAP Trial: SP-EA vs MP-TA Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Comparison of Perioperative and Postoperative Outcomes of Single-port (SP) Extraperitoneal Approach and Multi-port (MP) Transperitoneal Approach in Robot-assisted Radical Prostatectomy:A Propensity Score-matched Retrospective Cohort Study

Status
Active, not recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07666217
Acronym
CoSMAP
Enrollment
625
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2026-03-26
Completion date
2027-03-31
Last updated
2026-09-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Robot assisted radical prostatectomy, RARP, Single port, da Vinci SP, Extraperitoneal approach, Transperitoneal approach, Propensity score matching

Brief summary

This multicenter retrospective observational study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes between the da Vinci SP extraperitoneal approach (SP-EA) and the robotic multi-port transperitoneal approach (MP-TA) in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy for localized prostate cancer.

Detailed description

This is a multicenter, retrospective, propensity score-matched observational cohort study conducted in Japan. The study aims to compare perioperative and postoperative outcomes of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) performed using the da Vinci SP extraperitoneal approach (SP-EA) and the robotic multi-port transperitoneal approach (MP-TA) in patients with localized prostate cancer. Clinical data will be retrospectively and continuously collected from participating institutions and analyzed to evaluate the utility and potential clinical benefits of the SP-EA approach.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Intuitive Surgical
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
RETROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with localized prostate cancer (clinical stage T1-T3a, N0, M0) eligible for radical prostatectomy 2. Patients who underwent RARP via SP-EA or MP-TA on or after January 1, 2023 3. Patients with available postoperative follow-up data for ≥6 months (≥166 days) \*note 1)

Exclusion criteria

1. Patients who have expressed an intention to refuse the use of their data for this study 2. Patients who underwent RARP using surgical approaches other than those specified in the inclusion criteria (e.g., transvesical approach) 3. Patients who underwent RARP with pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) 4. Patients with a history of radiotherapy for prostate cancer 5. Any other patients whom the principal investigator or a co-investigator deem inappropriate, such as those with missing outcome data.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Incidence of postoperative complications and Clavien-Dindo Grade 3a or higher postoperative complicationsWithin 6 and 12 months after surgeryPostoperative complications occurring after robot assisted radical prostatectomy, including complications classified as Clavien-Dindo Grade 3a or higher.
Urinary continence rateWithin 6 and 12 months after surgeryAchievement of urinary continence after robot assisted radical prostatectomy.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Total operative timeDuring surgeryTotal operative time measured in minutes.
Console timeDuring surgeryConsole time measured in minutes.
Estimated blood lossDuring surgeryEstimated blood loss measured in milliliters.
Intraoperative transfusion rateDuring surgeryProportion of patients requiring blood transfusion during surgery.
Nerve sparing rateDuring surgeryProportion of patients undergoing nerve sparing procedures.
Drain placement rateDuring surgeryProportion of patients requiring surgical drain placement.
Intraoperative complication rateDuring surgeryvascular injury / organ injury / nerve injury / others
Conversion rateDuring surgeryConversion to open surgery
Positive surgical margin rateImmediately after surgeryProportion of patients with positive surgical margins
Length of hospital stayFrom the date of surgery until the date of hospital discharge, assessed up to 30 days after surgeryNumber of days from the date of surgery (Day 0) to hospital discharge.
Foley catheter durationFrom the date of surgery until the date of Foley catheter removal, assessed up to 30 days after surgeryNumber of days from the date of surgery (Day 0) to Foley catheter removal.
Postoperative serum PSA levelAt 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after surgeryPostoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level measured as an actual value in ng/mL
Biochemical recurrence rateWithin 6 and 12 months after surgeryDefined as PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL
Readmission rateWithin 6 and 12 months after surgery
Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scoreAt hospital discharge, an average of 7 daysNumeric Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating worse pain.
Sexual function scoreAt 6 months and 12 months after surgerySexual Health Inventory for Men (SHIM), ranging from 1 to 25, with higher scores indicating better erectile function

Countries

Japan

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORMasashi Takenaka

Fujita Health University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 18, 2026