Skip to content

Propolis-Based Solution Application in Extraction Socket Healing

Propolis-Based Solution Application in Extraction Socket Healing: A 3D Split-Mouth Clinical Pilot Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07665814
Enrollment
14
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2025-10-01
Completion date
2026-04-01
Last updated
2026-06-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Healthy

Brief summary

This pilot study evaluated whether a propolis-based topical solution improves soft-tissue healing after tooth extraction. Thirteen patients requiring extraction of two comparable teeth on opposite sides of the mouth were enrolled in a split-mouth design, in which one extraction site received the propolis solution while the other served as an internal control. The test site was treated with the propolis solution three times daily for seven days, while the control site received only saline rinses. Healing was tracked using 3D intraoral scans obtained before extraction and on days 7 and 14 afterward, allowing the percentage of socket closure to be measured objectively over time. Postoperative pain was also assessed using a standard visual pain scale on days 1, 3, and 7. The study aimed to determine whether this propolis-based formulation could serve as a natural, low-cost adjunct to standard post-extraction care to support faster tissue repair.

Interventions

DRUGPropolis-based topical solution (52% propolis extract, clove oil [Eugenia caryophyllus], and white willow bark [Salix alba] extract)

Drug: Propolis-Based Solution "A topical solution (52% propolis extract, clove oil, and white willow bark extract) applied to the test extraction socket via brush applicator three times daily for seven days."

OTHERSaline rinse (control)

The contralateral extraction socket received saline mouthwash only, with no active therapeutic agent applied, following the same pre-application oral hygiene steps (tooth brushing and saline rinse) as the test site

Sponsors

Saint-Joseph University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Split-mouth design

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
8 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Cooperative adult patients willing to accept the study protocol * Minors with a cooperative parent/legal guardian providing consent * Non-surgical extraction of bilaterally positioned teeth * Low-to-moderate extraction difficulty per the Pederson scale * Systemically healthy, with no history of systemic disease

Exclusion criteria

* Non-consenting patients * Failure to attend follow-up appointments per protocol * Heavy smokers (\>10 pack-years) * Systemic disease (e.g., diabetes mellitus, immunosuppressive syndromes) * Current use of contraceptive medication * Systemic antibiotic therapy within the previous 3 months * Anticoagulant therapy within the previous 4 weeks * Requirement for antibiotic prophylaxis * Pregnant or breastfeeding women * Known allergy to honey or bee-related products * Known allergy to local anesthetics used in dental procedures * Higher-difficulty extractions requiring sutures or other hemostatic measures

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Extraction Socket Surface Area ClosureBaseline (Day 0), Day 7, and Day 14 post-extractionPercentage reduction in socket surface area from baseline, calculated from 3D intraoral scans using the formula: % Closure = (Baseline area - Timepoint area) / Baseline area × 100.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain ScoreDay 1, Day 3, and Day 7 post-extractionPain intensity rated on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (VAS), with higher scores indicating greater pain.

Countries

Lebanon

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 30, 2026