Skip to content

Postoperative Cognitive Function After Different Anesthetic Techniques in Obese Patients

Effects of Low-Flow Sevoflurane, Normal-Flow Sevoflurane, and Total Intravenous Anesthesia on Postoperative Cognitive Function in Obese Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Abdominal Surgery

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07665645
Enrollment
90
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2023-01-10
Completion date
2023-06-20
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Obesity (BMI>30), Postoperative Cognitive Function

Keywords

Obesity, Cognitive Function, Mini-Mental State Examination, MMSE, Sevoflurane, Total Intravenous Anesthesia, TIVA, Low-Flow Anesthesia, BIS Monitoring, Laparoscopic Surgery

Brief summary

Obese patients are at increased risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). The effects of different anesthetic techniques on postoperative cognitive function remain controversial. This prospective randomized study aimed to compare the effects of low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, normal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, and total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) on postoperative cognitive function and recovery characteristics in obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery. Cognitive function was assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) before surgery, at postoperative 30 minutes, and on postoperative day 3.

Detailed description

Obesity is associated with physiological alterations that may increase the risk of postoperative cognitive dysfunction (POCD). The influence of anesthetic techniques on postoperative cognitive outcomes in obese patients remains uncertain. This prospective randomized study was conducted in obese patients (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) aged 18-65 years undergoing elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery under general anesthesia. Patients were randomly assigned to one of three groups: low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, normal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Anesthetic depth was monitored using bispectral index (BIS) monitoring and maintained between 40 and 60 in all groups. The primary objective was to compare postoperative cognitive function among the three anesthetic techniques using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE). MMSE scores were evaluated preoperatively, at postoperative 30 minutes, and on postoperative day 3. Secondary objectives included comparison of recovery characteristics, including eye-opening time, extubation time, Modified Aldrete Recovery Scores, and perioperative hemodynamic parameters. The study was approved by the Marmara University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval No. 09.2022.744) and written informed consent was obtained from all participants before enrollment.

Interventions

Maintenance of general anesthesia with sevoflurane inhalation. Patients were assigned to either low-flow (1 L/min) or normal-flow (3 L/min) fresh gas flow anesthesia protocols.

DRUGpropofol

Maintenance of total intravenous anesthesia using continuous propofol infusion under BIS monitoring.

DRUGRemifentanil

Continuous remifentanil infusion was administered during maintenance of anesthesia according to study protocol.

Sponsors

Gaziantep City Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

Participants were unaware of the anesthetic technique assigned to them. Postoperative cognitive assessments were performed by an outcome assessor blinded to group allocation. Anesthesia providers were aware of treatment allocation because of the nature of the interventions.

Intervention model description

Participants were randomly assigned to one of three parallel groups: low-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, normal-flow sevoflurane anesthesia, or total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA). Cognitive function was evaluated using the Mini-Mental State Examination before surgery, at postoperative 30 minutes, and on postoperative day 3.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Age between 18 and 65 years * Body mass index (BMI) ≥30 kg/m² * ASA physical status I-III * Scheduled for elective laparoscopic abdominal surgery * Provision of written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* History of psychiatric disease * Dementia or known cognitive impairment * Hearing or language disorders preventing MMSE assessment * Refusal to participate * Conversion from laparoscopic to open surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) ScorePreoperative, postoperative 30 minutes, and postoperative day 3Postoperative cognitive function assessed using the Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Eye Opening TimeEnd of surgeryTime from discontinuation of anesthetic administration to spontaneous eye opening
Extubation TimeEnd of surgeryTime from discontinuation of anesthetic administration to tracheal extubation.
Modified Aldrete Recovery ScorePostoperative recovery periodRecovery status assessed using the Modified Aldrete Score.
heart rateDuring surgerypatient's intraoperative measured heart rate
mean arterial pressureduring surgerypatient's intraoperative measured mean arterial pressure
oxygen saturationDuring surgeryoxygen saturation of the patient will be recorded
end-tidal carbon dioxideDuring surgeryend-tidal carbon dioxide of the patient will be recorded

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAhmet Tunca, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Gaziantep City Hospital

STUDY_CHAIRSeniyye Ü Zengin, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Pendik Training and Research Hospital

STUDY_DIRECTORMeliha O Ergün, MD

Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Marmara University Faculty of Medicine, Pendik Training and Research Hospital

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026