Skip to content

Impact of Hyaluronic Acid and Bone Graft on Peri-Implant Tissue

Impact of Hyaluronic Acid and Bone Graft on PeriImplant Tissue Phenotype."A Randomized Controlled Trial"

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07665281
Enrollment
36
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2025-12-05
Completion date
2026-07-02
Last updated
2026-07-07

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Alveolar Bone Loss, Dental Implant, Partially Edentulous Jaw

Keywords

dental implant, Hyaluronic acid, gingiva, bone graft, Keratinized Mucosa

Brief summary

This randomized controlled clinical trial aims to evaluate the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) and particulate bone graft on the peri-implant tissue phenotype in patients receiving dental implants. Healthy adult participants requiring dental implant placement will be randomly allocated into one of three equal groups (12 implants per group): Group 1 will receive dental implants combined with hyaluronic acid gel (Gengigel); Group 2 will receive dental implants combined with both hyaluronic acid and particulate bone graft; and the control group will receive dental implants alone. Clinical and radiographic assessments will be performed using a customized measurement stent to ensure standardized evaluations at baseline, immediately postoperatively, and at 8 and 16 weeks of follow-up. The primary and secondary outcomes include alterations in ridge width, keratinized tissue width/thickness, radiographic soft tissue height, and marginal bone height. The study aims to determine whether the adjunctive use of hyaluronic acid and bone grafts enhances the quality of the peri-implant soft and hard tissue phenotype.

Interventions

PROCEDUREDental Implants with Hyaluronic Acid

Surgical placement of dental implants, followed by the application of hyaluronic acid gel at the implant site, was performed to evaluate its impact on peri-implant tissue phenotype.

PROCEDUREDental Implants with Hyaluronic Acid and Particulate Bone Graft

Surgical placement of dental implants, combined with the application of hyaluronic acid gel and particulate bone graft at the implant site, was performed to evaluate its impact on peri-implant tissue phenotype.

PROCEDUREStandard Dental Implants Placement only

Standard surgical placement of dental implants following conventional clinical protocols without the application of any adjunctive materials.

Sponsors

Al-Mustansiriyah University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Masking description

The outcomes assessor was blinded to the group allocation to prevent bias during the evaluation of soft tissue width and crestal bone measurements.

Intervention model description

A randomized, controlled, parallel-group clinical trial with three arms: Group 1 (Dental Implants + Hyaluronic Acid), Group 2 (Dental Implants + Hyaluronic Acid + Particulate Bone Graft), and a Control Group (Dental Implants alone).

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Adults ≥ 18 years old. * Partially edentulous patients requiring dental implant placement. * Good oral hygiene (Calibrated Gingival Bleeding Index (GBI) \< 10%, O'Leary ---Plaque Index (PI) \< 10%). * Sufficient bone volume for implant placement.

Exclusion criteria

* Systemic conditions affecting bone healing (e.g., uncontrolled diabetes). * Smoking \> 10 cigarettes/day. * Medications affecting bone metabolism (e.g., bisphosphonates). * Active periodontal disease. * Pregnant or lactating women.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ridge Width Changes (RW)Baseline (preoperative), immediate postoperative, 8 weeks, and 16 weeks.The changes in Ridge Width is measured at the reference points using a digital vernier caliper.
Bone Width (BW)Baseline (preoperative), and 16 weeks postoperativelyMeasured in millimeters by subtracting the buccal and lingual mucosal thickness from the ridge width.
Change in width of keratinized tissue (KTW)Baseline (preoperative), 8 weeks, and 16 weeksMeasured in millimeters at the mid-buccal aspect of the implant site using an endodontic rotary file and digital vernier caliper.
Keratinized Tissue Thickness (KTT)Baseline (preoperative), and 16 weeks postoperativelyMeasured in millimeters at the buccal, crestal and lingual reference points using a periodontal probe and a digital vernier caliper.
Radiographic Mucosal Thickness (RT)Baseline (preoperative), immediate postoperative, 8 weeks, and 16 weeksMeasured in millimeters on periapical radiographs using digital software from the crestal bone level to the crest of crestal oral mucosa 5 mm away from the height distal surface of the adjacent tooth on the mesial side of the implant.
Crestal Bone Height (BH)Immediate postoperative, 8 weeks, and 16 weeksMeasured in millimeters on periapical radiographs using digital software from the second serration on the mesial side of the implant to the crest of the bone.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Postoperative Pain ScoresThree times daily (morning, afternoon, and evening) for the first 7 days postoperativelyPatients received a standardized pain assessment chart for self-evaluation over seven consecutive postoperative days. This chart featured an 11-point (0-10) Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) integrated with the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale and supplemented with descriptive pain expressions ranging from a minimum value of 0 (representing no pain) to a maximum value of 10 (representing the worst possible pain), where higher scores indicate a worse outcome (greater pain severity).
Plaque Index (PI)Baseline (preoperative), 8 weeks, and 16 weeksO'Leary plaque index
Gingival Index (GI)Baseline (preoperative), 8 weeks, and 16 weeksGingival Bleeding Index

Countries

Iraq

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 8, 2026