Chronic Pain
Conditions
Brief summary
This study evaluates the effectiveness of a oriented massage by comparing it with that of a classic symmetrical massage.
Detailed description
After being informed, included and randomised, the 50 people received four successive massages. Four receive a symmetrical massage and four receive a directional massage, in a 1:1 ratio.
Interventions
Physiotherapy-type massage
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Patients suffering from chronic spinal pain (for at least 3 months) refractory to PO2S * Patients aged between 18 and 80 * Patients having been treated with PO2S and still suffering from refractory pain * Patients who gave informed consent to participate in the study
Exclusion criteria
* Patients whose chronic spinal pain is caused by inflammatory disease, tumour, infection or trauma to the back. * Patients with a history of back surgery and/or vertebral fracture in the last 6 months * Patients with a motor disability related to the reason for consultation * Women who are more than six months pregnant. * Patients who are unable to communicate or understand the study process. * Patients who had been assessed and excluded by Dr Jean Luc Isambert.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Pain Intensity on the 0-to-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale | Day 0 immediately before treatment Session 1, Day 1 at 24 hours after treatment Session 1, Day 7 immediately before treatment Session 2, and Day 8 at 24 hours after treatment Session 2 | Pain intensity will be assessed using the 0-to-10 Numeric Pain Rating Scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain. Higher scores indicate greater pain intensity. The outcome measure is the change in pain intensity score from immediately before each treatment session to 24 hours after the same treatment session. |
Countries
New Caledonia