Skip to content

Effects of Drop Jump During Warm-up on Athletic Performance and Ankle Stability in Young Basketball Players

Effects of Drop Jump During Warm-up on Jumping Ability, Sprint Performance and Ankle Landing Stability: A Randomized Controlled Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07664475
Enrollment
22
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2026-03-02
Completion date
2026-04-27
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Athletes, Performance

Keywords

Basketball Players, Warm-Up, Ankle Stability

Brief summary

Youth basketball is a sport that requires high levels of power and speed. Regardless of the competitive level, young athletes undergo rigorous training to enhance their coordination, neuromuscular reactivity, jump height, and sprint speed. Each youth basketball player voluntarily underwent testing at the same sports facility after reading and signing the informed consent document (provided by parents or legal guardians). During the first session, general anthropometric information was collected on all participants (age, weight, and height), followed by an assessment of athletic performance and stability parameters. For the vertical jump performance parameters, the Counter Movement Jump test (CMJ) was used through an optical detecting system. A pressure platform was used to measure ankle stability during the landing phase using a single-leg jump protocol, while acceleration performance was evaluated via a 10-meter sprint test. Subsequently, participants were randomly divided into two groups: an experimental group (EG) and a control group (CG). The EG performed a Drop Jump protocol at the end of warm-up, consisting of three sets of 5 repetitions, with a 3-minute rest period between sets, for a total duration of 8 weeks. At the end of the eight weeks, all measurements regarding the evaluated outcomes (vertical jump height, CMJ, landing ankle stability, and 10-meter sprint) were repeated for both groups.

Interventions

OTHERDrop Jump

Three sets, each consisting of 5 repetitions with 3-minute breaks between sets, to be performed twice a week. During each DJ trial, the participants were asked to perform a maximum vertical jump with their hands at their sides as soon as possible after touching the ground. They were also given 15 seconds to climb back onto the drop and perform another trial.

Sponsors

University of Palermo
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
OTHER
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Intervention model description

Experimental Group (EG) and Control Group (CG)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
13 Years to 14 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Active participation in competitive training programs (at least 7 hours per week), at least one year of experience in competitions organized by the Italian Basketball Federation, and no recent injuries.

Exclusion criteria

* Presence of current or not fully recovered injuries to the ankle or foot, and irregular participation in training sessions within the three weeks preceding the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Counter Movement Jump (CMJ)At the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 8-week treatment (T1)Initially, the athlete stands upright on a flat surface or force platform, feet shoulder-width apart, hands on hips (to eliminate arm swing). Without a pause, the athlete performs a quick downward movement (countermovement) by bending the knees and hips, then immediately jumps vertically as high as possible. The athlete lands in an upright position on the same spot, trying to absorb the impact with knees slightly bent. Jump height and flight time is recorded using an optical system, Optojump™ system(Microgate, Bolzano, Italy) connected to a personal computer with dedicated software(OptojumpTM Next software). The system consists of two optical bars, a receiver and a transmitter, positioned 1m apart. The bars identify ground contact time(with a precision of 1ms) and then convert non-contact time into cm. Based on recommendations on optimal jump height (20 to 60cm).
Ankle Landing StabilityAt the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 8-week treatment (T1)Ankle stability was assessed using a functional monopodalic protocol, which involved four jumps on one foot: two per leg, both frontally and laterally. These jumps were performed by stepping over an adjustable obstacle set at 70% of the maximum height reached on a pressure platform (SensorMedica freeMed 40×40, Guidonia Montecelio, Italy). The platform has an active sensory surface of 40×40 cm with a thickness of only 8 mm and a low weight of approximately 4 kg. Inside, there are resistive sensors coated in 24K gold on conductive rubber, with a density of approximately 10,000 sensors/m².The acquisition frequency is high, up to 400 Hz, allowing for detailed dynamic analysis, and the sensors have a life cycle of over 1,000,000 cycles of use
Sprint PerformanceAt the beginning of enrollment ( Baseline, T0) and the end of the 8-week treatment (T1)Two cones were placed 10 meters apart. The participants were then asked to perform 3 sprints, with 3-minute recovery periods in between. A manual stopwatch was used, which was started exactly when the operator gave the start signal and stopped exactly as the subject passed the second cone.

Countries

Italy

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026