Skip to content

Theranostic PET for Target Validation and Tumor Detection

Theranostic PET for Target Validation and Tumor Detection

Status
Recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07664410
Acronym
TheranosticPET
Enrollment
2000
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2025-09-23
Completion date
2035-09-23
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Solid Malignancies

Brief summary

Patients are referred for theranostic PET using different tracers as part of clinical routine for tumor staging, re-staging, and therapy planning to our department. The aim of this study is to collect data on the expression of target molecules/receptors, proportion of PET positive tumor regions, positive predictive value, detection rate, reproducibility, and impact on clinical management of theranostic PET/CT or PET/MRI using novel theranostic PET tracers or other established PET tracers that are performed in theranostic concepts on patients receiving this imaging modality as part of clinical standard both at initial diagnosis and restaging before treatment decisions. Primary Endpoint: Association between PET uptake intensity in theranostic PET and histopathologic expression of the respective molecular target.

Detailed description

Patients are referred for theranostic PET using different tracers as part of clinical routine for tumor staging, re-staging, and therapy planning to our department. The aim of this study is to collect data on the expression of target molecules/receptors, proportion of PET positive tumor regions, positive predictive value, detection rate, reproducibility, and impact on clinical management of theranostic PET/CT or PET/MRI using novel theranostic PET tracers or other established PET tracers that are performed in theranostic concepts on patients receiving this imaging modality as part of clinical standard both at initial diagnosis and restaging before treatment decisions. Primary Endpoint: Association between PET uptake intensity in theranostic PET and histopathologic expression of the respective molecular target. Secondary Endpoints: 1. Proportion of tumor manifestations with uptake in theranostic PET on a per-lesion, per-region, and per-patient basis 2. Detection rate and positive predictive value (PPV) of theranostic PET on a per-patient and per-region-basis for detection of tumor location, confirmed by histopathology/biopsy, clinical and conventional imaging follow-up (separate for regional, extra-regional and distant locations) 3. Sensitivity and specificity of theranostic PET on a per-patient and per-region-basis for detection of tumor location confirmed by histopathology/biopsy (separate for regional, extra-regional and distant locations) 4. Change in staging/prognostic groups and impact on clinical management 5. Inter-reader reproducibility 6. Detection rates of theranostic PET on a per-patient basis stratified by tumor maker serum level and velocity (if available) 7. Detection rate and PPV of theranostic PET (using different PET tracers) on a per-patient and per-region-basis stratified by PET tracer, tumor histology and involved organs Hypothesis and expected outcome: The PET signal (of the theranostic PET) correlates with expression levels of the respective molecular target. This can enable to discover novel imaging-based and clinical biomarkers Further, theranostic PET demonstrates high PPV and detection rate for tumor lesions, both locally and with distant metastases, compared to conventional morphological imaging, and it has the potential to be utilized for staging and restaging purposes for patients with various tumors. Moreover, expression of the respective target will enable therapeutic options in a relevant fraction of patients. Inclusion criteria: 1. PET with a theranostic tracer (e.g., 68Ga-SSO120, 68Ga- DPI-4452, 68Ga-Pentixafor, 68Ga-DOTATOC, 68Ga-PSMA-11/18F-PSMA-1007, 68Ga-FAPI-46, 68Ga-NeoB or other PET tracer with theranostic potential) scheduled for staging or restaging of tumor types outlined in attached CRF #1 "Patient Screening and Diagnosis" as part of clinical routine 2. Age ≥ 18 years Exclusion criteria: 1. Patient cannot give consent for the study 2. Patient cannot lie flat or tolerate PET imaging 3. Unwillingness or inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures 4. Condition of patient which is critical to participate in this study in the discretion of the investigators 5. Pregnant, lactating, or breast-feeding women

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

University Hospital, Essen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. PET imaging with a theranostic PET tracer scheduled for staging or restaging of tumor types as part of clinical routine 2. Age ≥ 18 years

Exclusion criteria

1. Patient cannot give consent for the study 2. Patient cannot lie flat or tolerate PET imaging 3. Unwillingness or inability to comply with study and follow-up procedures 4. Condition of patient which is critical to participate in this study in the discretion of the investigators 5. Pregnant, lactating, or breast-feeding women

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Association between PET uptake intensity in theranostic PET and histopathologic expression of the respective molecular target.12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of tumor manifestations with uptake in theranostic PET on a per-lesion, per-region, and per-patient basis12 months
Detection rate and PPV of theranostic PET on a per-patient and per-region-basis, confirmed by histopathology, clinical and conventional imaging follow-up12 months
Change in staging/prognostic groups and impact on clinical management12 months
Inter-reader reproducibility12 months
Detection rates of theranostic PET on a per-patient basis stratified by tumor maker serum level and velocity (if available)12 months
Detection rate and PPV of theranostic PET (using different PET tracers) on a per- patient and per-region-basis stratified by PET tracer, tumor histology and involved organslevel and velocity (if available)12 months

Countries

Germany

Contacts

CONTACTJosephine Enste
josephine.enste@uk-essen.de+492017232073
CONTACTAlina Toni Küper, MD
alina.kueper@uk-essen.de+492017232073
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORDavid Kersting, MD PhD

University Hospital, Essen

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026