Skip to content

Effectiveness and Safety of an Electronic Medical Record-Integrated Glucose Management System for Inpatient Diabetes Care: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of the Far Eastern Memorial Hospital Electronic Glucose Management System (eGMS) With Conventional Subcutaneous Basal-Bolus Insulin Protocol in Ordinary Ward Patients: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07664293
Acronym
FEMH-eGMS
Enrollment
140
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2023-04-12
Completion date
2026-04-23
Last updated
2026-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Type 2 Diabetes

Keywords

eGlycemic Management System, in hospital hyperglycemia, Subcutaneous basal bolus insulin protocol

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the eGMS designed by FEMH with the usual insulin ordering protocol in the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous insulin therapy in ordinary ward.

Detailed description

Both inpatient hyperglycemia and hypoglycemia increase the adverse effects of ordinary ward patients, including mortality rate, so the American Diabetes Association recommends that the blood glucose target for inpatients is 140 to 180 mg/dL. Previous studies found that the use of electronic glucose management system (eGMS) could increase the achievement of the goal. Currently, there are several eGMS on the market, such as Glucommander(Glytec,Greenville,SC)、EndoTool System(MD Scientific LLC,Charlotte,NC) and GlucoStabilizer(Medical Decision Network,Charlottesville,VA), although they were proved to improve in blood glucose management in hospitals, nurses still need to manually enter clinical parameters and each blood glucose data, causing a burden on medical staff. Neither Glucommander nor EndoTool system considered vital signs, intravenous and partial intravenous nutrition infusion, diagnosis of hepatic, renal and heart failure, which would also affect the level of blood glucose. To our best knowledge, no similar eGMS has been developed in Asia or Taiwan. Our hospital is about to develop an easy-to-operate eGMS. This system can automatically obtain the patient's demographic characteristics, vital signs, daily diet and intake status, usage of anti-diabetic agents or other medications that affect the level of blood glucose, the ICD codes of hypoglycemia risk factors, and laboratory test results from the electronic medical records of the hospital. There is no need to manually input by the medical staff, and the recommended insulin dose will be updated and calculated continuously. The FEMH eGMS study will be developed in Feb. 2022. The purpose of this study is to compare the eGMS designed by FEMH with the usual insulin ordering protocol in the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous insulin therapy in ordinary ward.

Interventions

DEVICEFEMH Electronic Glucose Management System (FEMH-eGMS)

Inpatient blood glucose control of patients in the interventional group received the dose of insulin injection therapy by suggestion of eGMS.

PROCEDUREControl group

Patients in the control group received insulin injection therapy according to the usual insulin ordering protocol

Sponsors

Far Eastern Memorial Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Masking description

Patients in the same ward will be randomly assigned by computer in a ratio of 1:1 to the interventional group or the control group.

Intervention model description

1. This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted in the ordinary ward of the Department of Metabolism, Integrative Medicine and General Medicine. Patients in the same ward will be randomly assigned by computer in a ratio of 1:1 to the interventional group or the control group. 2. Patients who meet the inclusion criteria will be referred by the attending physician, and then study P.I. or researcher will explain the trial method, and the research will be carried out after obtaining the patient's consent in writing. The patient does not know that he is assigned to which group. 3. Patients in the control group received insulin injection therapy according to the usual insulin ordering protocol; 4. Inpatient blood glucose control of patients in the interventional group received the dose of insulin injection therapy by suggestion of eGMS.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age ≥ 20 years * Type 2 diabetes mellitus * Required four-times-daily subcutaneous basal-bolus insulin during admission * At least two point-of-care glucose readings \>180 mg/dL during admission

Exclusion criteria

* Type 1 diabetes mellitus * Pregnancy * Gestational diabetes * Hyperosmolar hyperglycemic state or diabetic ketoacidosis at admission * Total parenteral nutrition * Treatment with intravenous insulin infusion (insulin pump)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
the mean percent of glucose readings between 140 and 180 mg/dL per patientthrough study completion, an average of 7 daysCalculated for each patient and averaged across all eligible patients in each study arm

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Glycemic control: patient day weighted mean glucosethrough study completion, an average of 7 daysmean glucose level for each patient day
Patient safety: proportion of patient-days with any glucose reading <70 mg/dL, <54 mg/dL, and >300 mg/dLthrough study completion, an average of 7 days\<70 mg/dL (hypoglycemia), \<54 mg/dL (severe hypoglycemia), and \>300 mg/dL (severe hyperglycemia)

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jun 25, 2026