Skip to content

LBBP + CSP Versus LBBP Alone for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy

Left Bundle Branch Pacing + Coronary Sinus Pacing Versus Left Bundle Branch Pacing Alone for Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy in Patients Eligible for CRT-P A Randomized Crossover Pilot Clinical Trial

Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07664189
Acronym
LOTTO-CRT
Enrollment
10
Registered
2026-06-24
Start date
2026-06-09
Completion date
2027-12-01
Last updated
2026-07-23

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure Low Output

Keywords

Left Bundle Branch Optimized CRT,, Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing, left ventricular ejection fraction, quality of life, Heart failure

Brief summary

The purpose of this pilot clinical trial is to evaluate whether a novel cardiac resynchronization strategy, called LOT-CRT, is more effective than standard physiological pacing alone (LBBAP) in patients with heart failure. This is a randomized, single-center, crossover pilot study involving 10 patients. All participants will receive a specialized pacemaker (CRT-P) with leads implanted in two specific areas: the Left Bundle Branch Area (LBBAP) and the Coronary Sinus (CS). Because of the crossover design, each patient will serve as their own control, receiving two different pacing configurations in a random order: Active Phase (LOT-CRT): Simultaneous pacing of the left bundle branch and the coronary sinus. Control Phase (LBBAP alone): Pacing only the left bundle branch area. Each treatment phase will last 6 months, for a total follow-up of 12 months per patient. By testing both strategies in the same patient, this study will help clinicians identify the most effective way to restore heart synchrony and improve clinical outcomes in patients with advanced heart failure and conduction delays.

Detailed description

This is a single-center, randomized, crossover pilot clinical trial. Each patient will serve as their own control. Following the successful implantation of a device capable of stimulating the LBBAP and the coronary sinus, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences: Sequence A: LOT-CRT (LBBAP + CS) for 6 months, followed by LBBAP alone Sequence B: LBBAP alone for 6 months, followed by LOT-CRT Each treatment phase will last 6 months, followed by an end-point evaluation and a crossover. Since the hemodynamic effect of electrical stimulation is immediate, no washout period is required between phases. This study was designed as an exploratory pilot study; therefore, no formal sample size calculation was performed. The number of patients enrolled is considered adequate to assess the feasibility of the procedure, the safety of the crossover design, and to identify preliminary signals of clinical and electrical efficacy.

Interventions

DEVICELeft Bundle Branch Optimized CRT

The CS lead will be implanted in a posterolateral or lateral vein using venography and standard IV delivery sheaths. Proper lead placement is confirmed by stable fixation, pacing capture, and absence of diaphragmatic pacing. The configuration for each phase of the study (LOT-CRT or LBBAP alone) will be assigned during randomization.

DEVICEStimulation of the left bundle branch area (LBBAP)

The LBBAP lead will be implanted via a transvenous approach using the C315His sheath, targeting the left bundle branch area in the right ventricular septum, ideally between the basal septum and the mid-septal region. Criteria for confirming successful LBBAP capture will include: * Evidence of narrowing of the stimulated QRS complex compared to baseline. * Right bundle branch block morphology on the ECG-stimulus-to-R-wave time in V6 \<80 ms (if available). * Low and stable pacing threshold (\<1.5 V @ 0.4 ms). * Unipolar impedance between 400-1500 ohms. The CS lead will be implanted in a posterolateral or lateral vein using venography and standard IV delivery sheaths. Proper lead placement is confirmed by stable fixation, pacing capture, and absence of diaphragmatic pacing.

Sponsors

Clinica Cardio VID
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Masking description

Since all patients will have both a coronary sinus electrode and a branch electrode (LBBAP) implanted, the study will be blinded only to the participants and to the investigators responsible for conducting the 6-minute walk test, the echocardiogram, and the NT-proBNP assessment. It will not be blinded to the electrophysiologists due to technical requirements. Additionally, outcome assessors and data analysts will also be blinded to the pacing mode (LBBAP or LOT - CRT). It will be blinded to the investigators and the patients. Outcome assessors and data analysts will also be blinded to the pacing mode (LBBAP or LOT - CRT).

Intervention model description

A single-center, randomized, crossover pilot clinical trial. Each patient will serve as their own control. Following the successful implantation of a device capable of stimulating the LBBAP and the coronary sinus, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequences: Sequence A: LOT-CRT (LBBAP + CS) for 6 months, followed by LBBAP alone or Sequence B: LBBAP alone for 6 months, followed by LOT-CRT. Each treatment phase will last 6 months, followed by an end-point evaluation and a crossover. Since the hemodynamic effect of electrical stimulation is immediate, no washout period is required between phases. Randomization will be performed using permuted blocks to ensure an equitable distribution of eligible participants across the two types of interventions. This randomization will be conducted using a 1:1 ratio, and blocks of size 2 will be selected.

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age ≥18 years 2. Standard CRT-P indications according to ESC 2021 (EF ≤50%, QRS ≥130 ms, sinus rhythm or controlled AF) 3. NYHA class II-IV 4. Coronary venous anatomy suitable for placement of a coronary sinus electrode. 5. Signed informed consent. 6. Successful implantation of electrodes in the coronary sinus and in the left bundle branch area (LBBAP)

Exclusion criteria

1. Concomitant indication for implantation of an implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD) or CRT-D 2. Significant uncorrected valvular disease or scheduled or anticipated cardiac surgery during the study period. 3. Anatomical or technical contraindication for lead implantation in the coronary sinus or for lead implantation in the coronary sinus (such as sinus stenosis, coronary sinus branches unsuitable for cannulation, inability to advance and/or stabilize the lead, among others) 4. Persistent atrial fibrillation with uncontrolled rate 5. Comorbidities that may limit life expectancy to \<1 year 6. Participation in another clinical trial that could confound the evaluation of results within the last 6 months. 7. Pregnancy or inadequate contraception 8. In the researcher's opinion, the participant would not comply with the activities and visits outlined in the study protocol

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Compare the effects of the LOT-CRT strategy versus left bundle branch block pacing (LBBAP) alone in each patient, comparing baseline to the end of the study FEVI, quality of life and functional class by NYHA.12 monthsInvestigators will evaluate the following parameters in each patient: Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) by echocardiography and electrocardiogram; functional capacity (NYHA class) using the 6-minute walk test and symptoms reported by the patient; quality of life (MLHFQ) using the MLHFQ quality of life scale

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in end-systolic diameter12 monthsAbsolute (mm) and relative (%) change in LVESV between baseline and 6 months.
QRS Duration12 monthsAbsolute (ms) and relative (%) changes in the 12-lead ECG.
Change in end-diastolic diameter12 monthsAbsolute (mm) and relative (%) change in LVEDV between baseline and 6 months.
NT-proBNP12 monthsAbsolute (ng/mL) and relative (%) change in NT-proBNP from baseline to 6 months
Echocardiographic responder12 monthsLVEF ≥10% elevation or LVESV ≥15% decreased
Echocardiographic super-responder12 monthsLVEF ≥50% or LVESV ≥30% decrease
Composite Clinical Outcome12 monthsCardiovascular Death or Hospitalization for Heart Failure
Procedural parameters12 monthsThresholds, P- and R-waves, impedance of each electrode.
Procedure Time/Fluoroscopy12 monthsTotal procedure time in minutes/ total fluoroscopy time in minutes.

Countries

Colombia

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORJuan F Agudelo, Electrophysiologist

Clinica CardioVID

STUDY_DIRECTORSusana Rios, Medical Epidemiologist

Clinica CardioVID

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Jul 24, 2026