Skip to content

The Combined Effects of Energy Density and Variety on Intake

The Combined Effects of Energy Density and Variety on Intake

Status
Not yet recruiting
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT07663214
Acronym
VarxED
Enrollment
50
Registered
2026-06-23
Start date
2026-10-01
Completion date
2027-07-31
Last updated
2026-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Eating Behaviors

Brief summary

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the influence independent fn combined influence of variety and energy density on food intake at a meal. Additionally, individual characteristics will be examined for their influence on the effects of variety and energy density on intake.

Interventions

Only one food served

Three foods served

OTHERLow ED

Foods are low in energy density

OTHERHigh ED

Foods are high in energy density

Sponsors

Cornell University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Regularly consume 3 meals per day * Like, are willing to eat, and do not have allergies to the study foods * Are willing to refrain from drinking alcohol the day before study visits * Are willing to consume a consistent breakfast the day of study visits * Have a BMI between 18.5-29.9 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria

* Experienced a weight change \>5 kg in the past month * Are a smoker * Are an athlete in training * Take medications or have a health condition known to affect appetite * Are pregnant or breastfeeding * Have ever been diagnosed with an eating disorder or depression * Specialize in the fields of psychology or nutritional sciences.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in food intakeWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Weight (grams) of the food consumed
Change in energy intakeWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Energy (kcal) of the food consumed

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change in water intakeWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Weight (grams) of water consumed
Change in meal durationWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Duration of the meal in minutes
Change in eating rateWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Mean food intake per minute (grams/minute), calculated by dividing meal food intake by meal duration
Change in sip countWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4The number of sips of water during the meal
Change in bite countWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4The number of bites of food during the meal
Change in bite sizeWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4Mean grams of food consumed per bite, calculated by dividing meal food intake by number of bites.
Change in switching between bites and sipsWeeks 1, 2, 3, 4The number of switches between bites and sips during the meal
Change in rating of liking of the taste of food samplesFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all pleasant (0 mm) to extremely pleasant (100 mm). This will be used to calculate Sensory-Specific Satiety
Change in rating of desire to eat food samplesFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all strong (0 mm) to extremely strong (100 mm), in answer to "How strong is your desire to eat \[this food\] right now?". This will be used to calculate Sensory-Specific Satiety.
Change in rating of thirstFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all thirsty (0 mm) to extremely thirsty (100 mm)
Change in rating of hungerFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all hungry (0 mm) to extremely hungry (100 mm)
Change in rating of nauseaFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all nauseated (0 mm) to extremely nauseated (100 mm)
Change in rating of fullnessFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from not at all full (0 mm) to extremely full (100 mm)
Change in rating of prospective consumptionFrom before the test meal to after the test meal in weeks 1, 2, 3, 4Measured on a 100-mm visual analogue scale ranging from nothing at all (0 mm) to a large amount (100 mm), in answer to "How much food do you think you could eat right now?".

Countries

United States

Contacts

CONTACTPaige M Cunningham, PhD
pmc242@cornell.edu607-255-2650
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORPaige M Cunningham, PhD

Cornell University

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 11, 2026